margorczynski

30 ms·

1. 481.▲
   by margorczynski 9y ago

   > The aim is to produce software libraries that are as safe as Go or Rust, roughly speaking, but as fast as C, and that can be used anywhere C libraries are used One question about this to people more versed in language compilation - wou
2. 482.▲
   by margorczynski 9y ago

   Related to this - I've always wondered why Mozilla doesn't just build-in an ad-blocker directly into the browser. The speed/security bump is significant. Probably because they want/need the deals with the search engine c
3. 483.▲
   by margorczynski 9y ago

   I've tried using it but at least for technical-related searches it doesn't event approach the quality of results I get from Google
4. 484.▲
   by margorczynski 9y ago

   And I think the compiler/interpreter can optimize the code much better when the creators know that such constructs are available in the language itself
5. 485.▲
   by margorczynski 9y ago

   Are the regulations blocking the development? Considering the demand is so high wouldn't the supply follow by e.g. scaling vertically?
6. 486.▲
   by margorczynski 9y ago

   Try out Manjaro, especially the i3 edition
7. 487.▲
   by margorczynski 9y ago

   From the article it seems Rust is really a great replacement for C++ and all it's complexity and quirks. I wonder how many other C++ projects are considering moving to it, anyone know about any major one like FF?