Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
marcinzm
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
68 ms
·
931.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
Yeah, as long as the team makes the rest of the engineers 1% more efficient it's a win in terms of investment.
932.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
Inequality has existed long before computers and is a social problem not a technical problem. You don't solve social problem with technical solutions since people are clever enough to simply find the next tool to enforce the social sta
933.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
How much of that is paid for by devs and how much is paid for by their employers?
934.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
>I have never spent 40% of my time battling internal tools.... In my experience, not at Amazon, long tenure employees get used to the quirky tools but the impact on new employees can be massive. Same with bad code bases, bad documentatio
935.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
The Central Bank is about hooking up a few valves and then predicting how every other valve's flow will react as a result. The Soviet system was closer to hooking up every single valve.
936.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
Why not? If economic conditions continued going well then they had the staff to meet their needs. If they didn't then they'd cut the worst performing employees and anyone else they didn't want. Since every other company would
937.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
>Almost always they include the same amenities (coffee, snacks, drinks), but it is in a boring office building or in another company's office build-out that they have no need for. There's a difference between the high and low q
938.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
This blog post doesn't make Google sound much better in that regard.
939.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
I almost find the flagging more interesting. This wasn't a bot. Someone had a AI assist them with writing a comment but they were the ones to prompt for it, review and to click comment. Conceptually it's very similar to advanced a
940.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
>It is no surprise they are shedding workers when the free money runs out. Free money hasn't run out, it's simply stopped growing as quickly. Then again it grew massively during COVID so FAANG is still ahead of where they'
941.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
I'm not sure I'd label every staff+ engineer at FAANG as a pretentious assholes.
942.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
>You have to add on the 34 bcms to the 45 bcms for a total of 79 billion cubic meters expected to be exported to Europe in 2022. The 34 was already being exported so it's sort of disingenuous to add it in terms of supply/demand
943.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
The US (in 2021) used 827 billion cubic meters of natural gas per year and produced 934. The amount it's expected to send to Europe (45 billion cubic meters) amounts to under 5% of its own production which has been increasing every yea
944.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
>He OWNS the company. So you agree that this is 99% on Elon past, present and future. Great that we're in alignment on my main point.
945.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
He approached twitter and signed a binding contract to buy them. They simply made him follow what he himself agreed to do in writing. If it's a dumpster fire then what does that make Elon for willingly signing a contract to buy it for
946.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
With debt interest he needs to squeeze money NOW versus in the future. In either case he overpaid severely for a company and now needs to squeeze money out of it at some point. Point stands that this is 99% Elon.
947.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
Then he shouldn't have signed a binding contract. Only an idiot investor wouldn't take twice the market value for an asset when given the chance.
948.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
They led to a stagnant company with -$200m in profits. Elon instantly led to a company that is now $1-2 billion in the red a year, and needs to aggressively cut costs and increase revenue to make it up. I'd say the current situation is
949.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
That explains why all he talks about is how to squeeze the most short term revenue out versus long term growth.
950.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
>In other words, that's how the world generally works. And suing people for it is also how the world works.
951.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
They hired 150% more people (yes the company grew to 2.5x since 2020) expecting metrics to grow 150% but metrics only are on track for growing 100%.
952.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
Wasn't that what the higher tier SSL certificates effectively aimed to do?
953.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
Java is special since it has mandatory version pinning of all dependencies, doesn't run code at install time and uses a full url for dependency names. That means dependencies don't auto-update, don't compromise CI/CD as
954.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
>I genuinely don’t understand why people feel the need to shove their ideology down peoples throat every chance they get. My perception is that every major ideological group is doing this and has been since civilization started. Most peo
955.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
If you view compliance as overreach then I find it odd you think the EU has less of it. Strong consumer laws such as GRPC are in the EU and not in the US. Even in terms of corporate finance there's a reason everyone like Delaware corpo
956.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
>Today Google's eight rules for managers is basically a cross between HR and a life coach. Is Google something to aspire to? They got early into a very lucrative market and have basically been milking it for decades. Good for them b
957.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
My partner has a number of chronic medical conditions. In general dealing with doctors is a pain for various already cited reasons. One advantage of the American system is that, with the right insurance, you can book almost any specialist w
958.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
Do you go to a different doctor every time, and is it a general doctor or a psychiatrist?
959.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
>Throughout the life of the project, I have always personally owned both domains. As it continued to grow, I additionally trademarked the name “Gitea” in order to protect the project’s brand. (More on the trademark later.) The issue as I
960.
▲
by
marcinzm
4y ago
No, liquidity means you can quickly convert something into cash and not that it has to be cash. To quote Cornell ( https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/liquid_asset ): >Liquid assets refer to cash on hand, cash on bank dep
More ›