manyoso

6 ms·

31.
by manyoso 3y ago
Let them resign. ChatGPT can’t resign. One more reason to replace human jobs I guess: the AI can’t resign.
32.
by manyoso 3y ago
Very nice skepticism.
33.
by manyoso 3y ago
Not here when the governance structure the way it is. The board has the last say. Now, there are obviously ways that investors can put pressure on the board and with literally billions at stake I can imagine that happening. Think serious es
34.
by manyoso 3y ago
Well said and I work in AI on LLM's as an engineer and am very skeptical in general that we're anywhere close to AGI, but I would listen to what Ilya Sutskever had to say with eager ears.
35.
by manyoso 3y ago
I think there is a good reason for you to be skeptical and I too am skeptical. But if there were a top five of the engineers in the world with the ability to really gauge the state of the art in AI and how advanced it was behind closed door
36.
by manyoso 3y ago
The salesmen always take the credit. If you see someone getting all the credit... 9 times out of 10 they are the salesman not the engineer or brains that actually built the thing. Add to that the hero worship for celebrity in our current c
37.
by manyoso 3y ago
Or maybe he was a "manager" who took the credit
38.
by manyoso 3y ago
Pure hero worship based on nothing. Dude got himself fired and the board accused him of lying.
39.
by manyoso 3y ago
LOL, the whole code is available here with the entire commit history and everyone who has committed. This is an open source project. https://github.com/nomic-ai/gpt4all-chat But go ahead with your scare mongering.
40.
by manyoso 3y ago
You can use github repos to communicate just fine and no one is requiring usage of discord lol.
41.
by manyoso 3y ago
And they didn't because GPT was a term of art in the industry long before it was a gleam in OpenAI's trademarking eyes.
42.
by manyoso 3y ago
But they didn't trademark GPT which would be the case if your analogy was to work.
43.
by manyoso 3y ago
No worries. People can get mad if they want, but I'm sleeping well. People have plenty of criticism on the internet; i'm rolling with it. Fact is thousands are using it and happy to have it so we've been delighting lots of pe
44.
by manyoso 3y ago
The fact that this confusion exists actually argues why they shouldn't be granted it actually as this project exists prior to them receiving it.
45.
by manyoso 3y ago
Nor would we want to. 4all is what we're trying to do.
46.
by manyoso 3y ago
People affiliated with openai have privately stated they are appreciative of this project.
47.
by manyoso 3y ago
I agree that the idea that openai isn't so "open" is now baked in. But shaming is still having an effect. Have received responses from people inside openai who appreciate this project.
48.
by manyoso 3y ago
And they should fail. The term is generic and widely used before they tried to brand with it.
49.
by manyoso 3y ago
Except this isn't coca cola. This is a term of art that is widely used in the industry and a number. OpenAI is welcome to rebrand on something that isn't so generic.
50.
by manyoso 3y ago
When the name was chosen it wasn't based on GPTJ. Now it is. There is no deception and the website was updated to respond to this criticism. It isn't affiliated and it clearly states that.
51.
by manyoso 3y ago
But we aren't actively trying that is why the frontpage was updated to respond to exactly this criticism. There is no active deception going on here. You don't like the name, that's fine, but it clearly states it isn't a
52.
by manyoso 3y ago
It isn't GPT4 and we don't call it that. And we clearly state that on our front page in first few lines. GPT is a term of art. OpenAI does not own it. You can think all you want about my character but I'm sleeping well. There
53.
by manyoso 3y ago
There is no wrong here though. The frontpage clearly states this is not chatgpt. No one is misleading anyone.
54.
by manyoso 3y ago
Making things clear on the very first page that this is not chatgpt is not "actively trying to mislead people"
55.
by manyoso 3y ago
The front page was changed to state this is not affiliated with other popular internet based gpt's in first few sentences. I get why people are cynical but the project really is trying to do the right thing.
56.
by manyoso 3y ago
See the recent update to https://gpt4all.io which does exactly that: "Running on your local computer, this model is not as powerful as those GPT models you can chat with over the internet by sending your data to large power
57.
by manyoso 3y ago
What is quite sad is that OpenAI has strayed from being open and for everyone like its original founding principles suggested. When GPT-4 came out they released hardly any technical information. This project was a response to that and sugge
58.
by manyoso 3y ago
It is not capitalizing so much as responding in a suggestive way. This project was started as a response to GPT-4, it is true. When OpenAI came out with version 4 and then refused to release any technical information whatsoever that was a w
59.
by manyoso 3y ago
You're being cynical for no good reason. Everything we've done has been put out under Apache 2 or MIT license. We take the 4 all seriously. See here for proof: https://github.com/nomic-ai/gpt4all-chat/iss
60.
by manyoso 3y ago
And if they do that they will really be putting to bed that openai is not so open won't they and have strayed far from their founding goals. But I don't believe they will do this. Lots of good people at OpenAI who I think can&#x2F

More ›