mannanj

6 ms·

61.
by mannanj 1mo ago
Is there evidence to suggest that inspections or shortage of them cause this? Why wouldn’t it be instead a need to cut corners and produce food differently, or anything else?
62.
by mannanj 1mo ago
And neither will they make clear what "analytical purposes" is for the data you can't opt out of. So they give you the ability to "opt-out" of "training purposes", and then you still share everything for a
63.
by mannanj 1mo ago
Doesn't the incentive here, lead to privatizing the AI and possibly releasing a different product to the public - or at least with a delay? (not too unlike how the frontier labs work today).
64.
by mannanj 1mo ago
Nice. Curious, what do you play with that thing? Do you think you'll still play those in 3-5 years? And are there games you do want to play but can't?
65.
by mannanj 1mo ago
Yeah. I switched to codex 1.5 months ago to try it, and for some reason the "vibe" kept me here. It was really the unpredictable rewards from the constant resets though. I am not convinced it's a better product or that sol +
66.
by mannanj 1mo ago
Am I the only one that now finds press releases like this similar to "AI Slop" I know there's tons of marketing language, buzz words and attempts at convincing me of some agenda that isn't super clear without lots of eff
67.
by mannanj 1mo ago
About 20 years ago my dad bought me a $5k computer, it was future proof for about "5 years" before we had to upgrade its internal parts (more memory, new graphics card). It was future proof but not really because it struggled a lo
68.
by mannanj 2mo ago
It's about what prompted asking the question in the first place. For me, and many others, when we notice an article is difficult to read, has lots of lies and hallucinations, and other serious issues that clearly indicate it was not we
69.
by mannanj 2mo ago
You don't think AI wrote most of it?
70.
by mannanj 2mo ago
You create demand by putting options next to you. No options, or the friction of pursuing them is too high? You have a fraction of the demand.
71.
by mannanj 2mo ago
So did I. And I've arrived to opposing conclusions. What makes your anecdotes more valuable or correct than mine?
72.
by mannanj 2mo ago
Ah, hadn't realized it had been studied. Nice find. Growing up with an immigrant family and parents who didn't have the opportunity I did to change environments and control the food around me (either by location, and proximity of
73.
by mannanj 2mo ago
How about growing up in a neighborhood and environment where there isn't negative influence and impulses around you to begin with? For your example, people in poor environments have more liquor stores, convenience stores, etc. If you a
74.
by mannanj 2mo ago
Everything is a rich man's trick
75.
by mannanj 2mo ago
Ironically, I've been already active on codex after trying it for the past 1.5 months, from Claude, and I find it to be similarly complex and confusing. I think they all have the similar styles and tells. If I were to go to Claude, and
76.
by mannanj 2mo ago
> If the image or text wasn't created by a human, then there was no intent behind the content, there is no message or novel information conveyed, and it reads as noise. If I were to push you a bit on this, when is it not true? Let&#
77.
by mannanj 2mo ago
I love sharing this here. If you want to have some privacy and protection, don't own a car. 3rd party car titling and registration services have existed for this purpose for decades, and once a property owned by that entity/LLC is
78.
by mannanj 2mo ago
I am concerned about it. I'm also concerned about what my options are in regards to action on my part - what can I do that makes an impact? Can we quantify action on my part to an impact somehow - if not - I'm just saying I notice
79.
by mannanj 2mo ago
Well then an ad hominem responding to an ad hominem responding to an ad hominem, does that make the original one ok? I can do better though not to engage in the first place when someone opens with hostility. It doesn't make my own ad h
80.
by mannanj 2mo ago
I can see now there's a rule around accusing someone of that. I can follow that, sorry I missed that rule. Though let's not lie and gaslight please. When you make commons about "spine" and then look at what you had state
81.
by mannanj 2mo ago
you responded to my observation about ad hominem with an ad hominem.
82.
by mannanj 2mo ago
Ok I see that now. thanks
83.
by mannanj 2mo ago
I've responded to you in one of the deeper threads below. I'll avoid creating too many open threads. I am disappointed though in your overly critical, quick to judge and dismiss attitude where you are stating your opinions as thou
84.
by mannanj 2mo ago
Sounds like you are resorting to attacking credibility and Ad Hominem attack when you don't even know me. I've openly criticized the agency at hand, and faced prior risk and harm and ridicule and embarrassingly the most closed min
85.
by mannanj 2mo ago
Ah yes. So can we just lump most LLM/AI problems into just "people" problems and stop falling for the popular mainstream straw man of "Look at the tech".
86.
by mannanj 2mo ago
Before LLMs we didnt have much accountability from leadership, that was eroding over time. After LLMs we still dont.
87.
by mannanj 2mo ago
That sounds kind of like deception, and a dark pattern not too unlike abuse to me. Though you know, it's not like the leadership tied to these companies have a history of abuse, deception and theft or anything like that, right? It&#x27
88.
by mannanj 2mo ago
I heard that. thank you. I had been a bit naive and gullible in the past, and resisted and several times was unable to gauge the actual risk and had severe negative repercussions for being the one who did what was right. I think thats the b
89.
by mannanj 2mo ago
Yeah back in 2022, I had just found my voice and developed a speaking style able to inspire understanding and articulate complex concerns down to simple concepts. I used that to convey the idea that a certain spy agency was a terrorist grou
90.
by mannanj 2mo ago
Seems like most popular mainstream platforms violate many of those heuristics. Google, Facebook, maybe even hacker news probably, does things with your data you likely never consented to. Do we decide who gets whatever date we generate on t

More ›