mallowdram

9 ms·

1. 91.▲
   by mallowdram 1y ago

   He who controls the arbitrary, controls the universe.
2. 92.▲
   by mallowdram 1y ago

   There are no world models in there, it's trained on arbitrary images/sequences. There are no world models in us, we learn from only specifics in topological space, stitched together in sharp wave ripples. Everything is from detach
3. 93.▲
   Longer wavelengths pass through human body have systemic impact improves vision(nature.com)

   9 points by mallowdram 1y ago|4 comments
4. 94.▲
   by mallowdram 1y ago

   It's wax fruit.
5. 95.▲
   by mallowdram 1y ago

   Can anyone point me to a "world-model" in the brain/body?
6. 96.▲
   by mallowdram 1y ago

   The generic collapse of storytelling in repetitive blockbusters meets its perfect mated vampire in LLMs trained on previous work. Hollywood is homogenization at scale of monoculture.
7. 97.▲
   by mallowdram 1y ago

   That's not what metonymy is.
8. 98.▲
   by mallowdram 1y ago

   Grice and Wittgenstein are good starts, but Cassirer, Basil Bernstein, Halliday, Reddy, Lakoff, Winograd, Stitch, Ryle, Givon, Deacon, Fontaine all weigh in on the notion that language doesn't cohere meaning. Each offers a different va
9. 99.▲
   by mallowdram 1y ago

   Speech by being is one thing, but words on the page have little hope of cohering semantic. This isn't theoretical physics, this is the transition of syntax from the writer (the task variable meanings that are no longer specific, they a
10. 100.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    Internally neural assemblies ie neural syntax. Externally action-glyphs as spatial syntax.
11. 101.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    Inside-Out is a reversal of the stimuli model and a reversal of the cog-sci cognition model. https://academic.oup.com/book/35081 The senses can't be excluded from consciousness or intelligence, otherwise the notio
12. 102.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    The criteria for learning in this model has nothing to do with biological intelligence. Segmentation is a cog-sci hold-over of vision science and Marr and isn't how brain's perceive scenes/objects/events. There is a rela
13. 103.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    Why would you waste time caring one way or the other?
14. 104.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    These aren't obscure non-sequiturs, and the very obvious AI bubble is indicative of a culture of CS that traded complexity for bypassing the dark matter of language, which is not disputable in majority of linguistics sub-fields. If you
15. 105.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    Unintentional satires aren't instructive, they're cringe.
16. 106.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    "Multiple contradictions in logic are complex statements where two or more propositions, taken together, assert the logical impossibility of their own truth, often resulting in two mutually exclusive conclusions" if you understand
17. 107.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    You're a linguist and you don't understand the difference between intent, a proposed state in brains in cog-science and intentionality, an arbitrary externalization? I find that impossible to believe a linguist doesn't grasp
18. 108.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    There is no such thing as intent. That's folk science you're describing. Thoughts aren't about things, they are things. “We refute (based on empirical evidence) claims that humans use linguistic representations to think.” Ev
19. 109.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    Prototypes in a task variable language. Both concatenated and topographic.
20. 110.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    Developing a bypass to language is hardly a breakthrough. It's been underway 20K years. We just got sidetracked by symbols. You engineers are so reliant on math, you can't see a way around it. That was the only way, math was a tri
21. 111.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    And, it will be easy. You've made junk tech from pseudoscience, classic houses of cards.
22. 112.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    These are mostly irrelevant. Debord is totally narrative, it's worthless. Baudrillard does grasp that the simulation (language, symbols, narratives) are seamless with physical reality, something the Matrix sisters falsely separated — i
23. 113.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    You again? Learn some manners engineer.
24. 114.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    Of course I've studied logic, particularly Eastern lack of requirement of logic. Language is inherently paradoxical, its inception, development defies logic in its endless contradictions. It can't be revealed by logic. The very id
25. 115.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    There is no such thing as intent. That's retrofitted. Meaning only emerges from the variations of task demands. We know this now from allocortex studies. Sure we can simulate meaning from our PFC, but that makes little difference if th
26. 116.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    Forget AI in this format, it'd a wash. It's counting. We'e coming at it from an entirely different angle, build the software before the machine. Assume it's a language that replaces language.
27. 117.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    No inter formats here, think "..words are a terrible straitjacket. It's interesting how many prisoners of that straitjacket resent its being loosened or taken off." Stanley Kubrick
28. 118.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    That's folk science, you've not studied linguistics.
29. 119.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    He wasn't comparing me to Derrida.
30. 120.▲
    by mallowdram 1y ago

    Those are slogans. Nil points.