make3

5 ms·

31.
by make3 1mo ago
it's also just waiting for Trump to be less powerful & making sure a bad precedent is not established, which is a good idea
32.
by make3 1mo ago
Maybe it's because the United States is not the whole planet
33.
by make3 1mo ago
This is my impression as well, that an exaggeratedly precise yet bad at communication with humans way of talking snuck in through reasoning RL, that it might be useful when it talks to itself (CoT)
34.
by make3 1mo ago
it started at Opus 4.7, way before watermarking
35.
by make3 2mo ago
It's probably the default clickbait title for any article about a new drug.
36.
by make3 2mo ago
this type of individualist responsibility diffusion is exactly why nothing happens in the US, & why France has protests the second the govt does anything bad. no one is asking you to solve the whole problem, just be part of fighting for
37.
by make3 2mo ago
I think Google's branding was starting to be too poor in AI to get top talent, they needed the refresh
38.
by make3 2mo ago
it's just a low effort snark comment, don't overthink it
39.
by make3 2mo ago
this is the correct take
40.
by make3 2mo ago
Snapchat's famously also is one
41.
by make3 2mo ago
this is just an empirical fact
42.
by make3 2mo ago
they often go into the minuses I'm sure, spending culture in the US is bananas
43.
by make3 2mo ago
here at 0.5 tok/s, it's like getting 1/100 of a tomato for your lunch per hour, and you can't just let it grow, you have to look at it growing just as you're about to eat, and it doesn't accumulate between meal
44.
by make3 2mo ago
paying for the hardware is also too expensive for no reason, you're not querying the llm 24/7. Better use a service that hosts a lot of popular open weights LLMs, unless you have a very good reason not to.
45.
by make3 2mo ago
You couldn't possibly successfully do clever hans for novel mathematical proofs and counter-examples that don't exist yet, however here we are. Generalization in successful results is enough to close this argument for me.
46.
by make3 2mo ago
It's just a way to get visibility. A Canadian apology to Lady Gaga while she's being interviewed.
47.
by make3 2mo ago
No one in the field itself takes Musk seriously, or sees him as part of it. I think he's a Nazi and an idiot. You're weird if you trust what the leader of DOGE, sig heiler and maker of the cyber truck says about anything scientifi
48.
by make3 2mo ago
Do you want companies to have incentives to pay researchers even if NDAs and non competes are basically unenforceable? Do you want any communication of knowledge from corporations? Should companies not be allowed to benefit from sometimes h
49.
by make3 2mo ago
I think talent would definitely take a startup that publishes more seriously, and it would be a smaller risk for top research talent to go somewhere where they can also publish than have to bear the full risk of their work at a no name star
50.
by make3 2mo ago
It's harder for them to argue you were actively destroying evidence; you could say that you had written the wipe pin there for a legitimate use case like both your wallet and your phone get stolen
51.
by make3 2mo ago
creating a convincing and actually safe innocuous mode is probably harder than it sounds in practice
52.
by make3 2mo ago
Your argument about not successfully competing doesn't hold because distillation is essentially model stealing. The situation is like trying to compete on effort in school on an exam against someone who's copying your answers. Of
53.
by make3 2mo ago
The Zirgs they call them (I'm kidding)
54.
by make3 2mo ago
Not arguing for the morality of it, but if we're going by the law because that's what you're using in your comment ("don't I own" which only matters wrt the law), then you explicitly accepted a Terms of Use whi
55.
by make3 2mo ago
no argument from me here
56.
by make3 2mo ago
There's no real way to compete with someone who gets the output of your own work for almost free in comparison. I sympathize with the argument saying that they ripped the whole Internet and books first though
57.
by make3 2mo ago
You can also get it to think in the output tokens pretty easily, eg "Here's a math problem, I want your reasoning first, then the answer" which is what I assume they're doing.
58.
by make3 2mo ago
It's about the claim of whether these companies could develop a similarly powerful model without larger companies building their own first, which is an important point, and it's likely not the case. It's also about the larger
59.
by make3 2mo ago
Distillation requires training
60.
by make3 2mo ago
The most concerning is the use of these tools to detect cheaters in schools.

More ›