madacol

12 ms·

61.
by madacol 3y ago
- Survey link: https://survey.devographics.com/en-US/survey/state-of-html/2... - State of HTML: https://stateofhtml.com/ It's the same organization ( https://www.devographics.c
62.
by madacol 3y ago
They don't claim they'll remove `onMount`. They claim most (but not all) of current usage of `onMount` will be better off using `$effect` instead
63.
by madacol 3y ago
zipline's "platform 1" is an airplane, and "platform 2" is a quadcopter shaped like an airplane. https://www.flyzipline.com/technology So they should have much better efficiency than typical quadcop
64.
by madacol 3y ago
to be more specific a snapshot of the board
65.
by madacol 3y ago
GODOT developers are trying to do it via https://w4games.com/ . But not sure if it's ready
66.
by madacol 3y ago
You can add to your uses cases a web viewer for MRI/CT scan results https://madacol.github.io/ozempic-dicom-viewer/
67.
by madacol 3y ago
Agree, though different profiles are a pain to use, I have to rely on the shell firefox -P profile2
68.
by madacol 3y ago
That's nice! So decompression is happening on the client, but not at the JS level, instead you are taking advantage of browser's ability to accept zip-encoded content from the server, hence decompression is done the by browser&#x2
69.
by madacol 3y ago
You told in another comment that the files are not decompressed on the server. Then if you don't require JS, where is the decompression happening?
70.
by madacol 3y ago
Yeah, server-side is much easier to code. But it should be doable with JS I've already built a website that read zip files client-side with JS here: https://madacol.github.io/ozempic-dicom-viewer/ . It will read t
71.
by madacol 3y ago
If the author decides to use the URL hash instead, he can avoid users sending that zip to his server i.e. https://smolsite.zip/#UEsDBB...
72.
by madacol 3y ago
Cool! I feel like there should be something like a bookmarklet store, similar to the extensions, or userscripts, right?
73.
by madacol 3y ago
To give you an example This is a bookmarklet to edit any text on a web page javascript: (function() { document.body.contentEditable = true; document.body.spellcheck = false; })(); Very useful when I want to grab a screenshot a
74.
by madacol 3y ago
I recently started to have the same ideas, and I have created 3 bookmarklets and 1 userscript https://github.com/madacol/web-automation
75.
by madacol 3y ago
Nautilus (Ubuntu's file explorer) allows to mount SFTP folders. Supposedly it uses `gvfs` under the hood. Note that SFTP uses an SSH connection for its file transfers, so I have not seen an UI difference from SSHFS
76.
by madacol 3y ago
You can do that too in Twitter "Turn off reposts"
77.
by madacol 3y ago
So a potential problem is that they are too low resolution? and that is something specific of full body MRI scans? I still disagree with the "net harmful" argument if it relies on patient's psychology. People may overreact at
78.
by madacol 3y ago
> In the case of body scans, the harm comes from more expensive followups or treatments to rule out false positives. That's not a problem with body scans, it's a problem with the medical system overreacting to the new informati
79.
by madacol 3y ago
You should also take into account patients that are already worried, and how much peace it brings when the scan results come clean --- But I am really worried with a deeper issue. A full-body MRI scan provides information, and supposedly wi
80.
by madacol 3y ago
> `nvm` That's mostly why!, you need to have installed something. If you don't use a build step you don't even need nodejs, your browser is your only dependency.
81.
by madacol 3y ago
If an MRI scan is truly practically harmless, and its only consequence is the information you get from it, then it's not the MRI who is causing the harm, but our own response to it "Avoiding MRI scans" as a solution is a hack
82.
by madacol 3y ago
What I take from your arguments is that medicine is a full shit-show. Don't blame the full-body scan if you think the medical system is the real problem
83.
by madacol 3y ago
Your argument implies that having less information is better. Why?
84.
Lightweight local web viewer for MRI/CT DICOM images(madacol.github.io)
2 points by madacol 3y ago|0 comments
85.
by madacol 3y ago
It's the same 3 examples shown in web page (It's a carousel, you have to click the "righ/left" buttons to see the others)
86.
GPT4 couldn't solve Semantle's word game of 11 August(chat.openai.com)
2 points by madacol 3y ago|2 comments
87.
by madacol 3y ago
https://semantle.com/yesterday this link will last a couple of hours before pointing to today's word
88.
by madacol 3y ago
A bigger reason we should be able to run websites on our phones is to run decentralized or local-first web apps, but this requires also solving that our phones' network become accessible (e.g. implement Ipv6, but preferably bootstrap s
89.
by madacol 3y ago
It's the most friendly free DNS I have encounter. - It's really free instead of "annoyingly free" that requires you to confirm every month that you are still using it. - It lets you update with a simple HTTP request + to
90.
by madacol 3y ago
I exaggerated a bit, it only happened with solar panels. But it does gives you a similar feeling when you schedule a maneuver on a point where the planet/moon blocks your signal, and you only realize after it's too late

More ›