maciejzj

5 ms·

31.
by maciejzj 10mo ago
I would say that it is bad when it has large derivative (positive or negative). However, the problem is not about >number of human beings< but about making agency that existing people have obsolete.
32.
by maciejzj 10mo ago
We don't know what the author had in mind, but one has to really be tone deaf to let the weirdness of the discussion go unnoticed. Take a look at the last paragraphs in the text again: > And not very long after, 93 per cent of those
33.
by maciejzj 10mo ago
I may have developed some kind of paranoia reading HN recently, but the AI atmosphere is absolutely nuts to me. Have you ever thought that you would see a chart showing how population of horses was decimated by the mass introduction of effi
34.
by maciejzj 11mo ago
I think that AI capabilities are now really impressive, nevertheless my point is not about it being “cool” it is, but rather what kind of society we are going to produce with it and how it impacts people’s lives. > It used to rightfully
35.
by maciejzj 11mo ago
I believe that the root cause for the "fatigue" and tension around AI is much more embedded in the societal context. US (and the rest of the western world) citizens face real life problems in youth employment, social/politica
36.
by maciejzj 11mo ago
This is truly heartbreaking, programming was the last profession beside medicine doctor that guaranteed young people good start in life in my country. It is insane how much screwed over we are. I am about to turn 30 soon with 5 YoE, PhD in
37.
by maciejzj 11mo ago
On a side note, has anyone noticed the disparity of attitude and level of intensity of dialogue when it comes to AI in different HN posts? Given that there are many threads where 80% act as if AI would cause second coming I suspected that m