machomaster

33 ms·

511.
by machomaster 3y ago
Yes, you are only one data point. Check the views on Ilya's interviews on youtube. E.g. his interview on Lex (which he did years before Sam Altman) has 400k views, which demonstrated that he is a very well known entity in tech/AI
512.
by machomaster 3y ago
Chinese papers are (with much higher probability) citing Chinese sources. It's a self-empowering cycle, which doesn't say anything about the quality.
513.
by machomaster 3y ago
This analogy is wrong. I have better ones. 1. Imagine a painter on the street, who made a quick painting of youand your partner in your natural state while being unaware of the process. Then he comes and asks if you are willing to pay and g
514.
by machomaster 3y ago
In his email signature he writes that he is a "Microsoft Regional Director". Even thought that is formally correct, in practice it is highly misleading, because it alludes that he works for Microsoft at the highest C/Director
515.
by machomaster 5y ago
Of course not, especially if the interference is on the level of "One activist's teenage daughter has a TikTok account" like it is in Navalny's case.
516.
by machomaster 5y ago
0. Well, it is being done when possible. But it's not a 100% way of reaching people. 1. State terrorism. People are genuinely afraid to give their email addresses, and for a good reason. 2. Email delivery. Email doesn't work as go
517.
by machomaster 5y ago
They have though. Kremlin has made plenty of effort in trying to delete individual videos and the whole channels. So far Google/Youtube have not complied. Let's see what happens after today's developments...
518.
by machomaster 5y ago
I agree with you that sanctions against countries don't work. But then the next logical step is to propose the action that actually works: sanctions against individuals. Perhaps that's what should be done - sanctions against indiv
519.
by machomaster 5y ago
It is a simple list of candidates recommended to vote for that, according to Navalny team's research, have the highest chance of defeating the Putin's candidates. The idea is that instead of spreading votes and allowing the baddie
520.
by machomaster 6y ago
Definitely not the only one. The second screenshot of an email also looks highly suspicious from my non-American point of view. The first sentence has "great (meeting you)". The second sentence has "really excited", &quo
521.
by machomaster 6y ago
In Option B the seller was paid $400K, not $100K.
522.
by machomaster 6y ago
This is a very limited (not honest) interpretation of what he said though. This is what Durov actually said: https://t.me/durovschat/515221
523.
by machomaster 6y ago
Yes. Durov was speaking about "few years", but it turned out to be 5. So if anything he was downplaying the competitor's issue, not the opposite. So coming back to the original claim of yours: how is what Durov said is not fa
524.
by machomaster 6y ago
You gave a link to Durov's fake account. Here is the official one. http://t.me/durov I recommend reading his last post.
525.
by machomaster 6y ago
Telegram Open Network. I drscribed the idea in another comment above.
526.
by machomaster 6y ago
Your interpretation (that you claim make Durov's statement not fully honest) is doing actually the exact opposite. It shows that if anything, Durov didn't write information, that - if written - would have shown Whatsapp in even wo
527.
by machomaster 6y ago
TON - Telegram Open Network. Blockchain-based technologies that also included the cryptocurrency called Gram, but is way more than just the cryptomoney. I highly recommend reading the "technical paper" if you have time and technic
528.
by machomaster 6y ago
How is it not honest if it is 100% factually correct?