Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
m101
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
m101
2mo ago
His complaining about the cost of distilling is hypocritical when the cost of writing all that text on the back of which he trained is also far lower than the cost of producing that text in the first place. The moral issue stops at wherever
32.
▲
by
m101
2mo ago
Given how much ai spending Google need to do, and that the are selling equity for the first time in a long time to do it, no doubt spacex shares are going to be dumped out they moment they can.
33.
▲
by
m101
3mo ago
The banks are not the ones on the hook here - they no longer lend in a meaningful way as first loss lender on many things. If they lend they do so as a senior financing provider to vehicles that provide the financing. The actual lending is
34.
▲
by
m101
3mo ago
The banks aren’t the ones on the hook here. Private credit funds are.
35.
▲
by
m101
3mo ago
The banks aren’t lending the money to these SPVs. It’s mostly private credit. The way banks get involved is that they may be lending senior financing to the private credit funds but that means they have a ton of subordination.
36.
▲
by
m101
3mo ago
Yes, according to this: https://x.com/SemiAnalysis_/status/2064815044085318040?s=20 also, codex apparently uses fewer tokens to complete tasks, in part because their tokeniser is about 80% the length of that in to
37.
▲
Ask HN: What do you think of xsight labs?
2 points
by
m101
3mo ago
|
0 comments
38.
▲
Xsight labs - anyone talking about these guys?
(xsightlabs.com)
4 points
by
m101
3mo ago
|
1 comments
39.
▲
by
m101
3mo ago
Anyone heard or xsight labs? They are making networking gear for AI and spacex satellites. I'd be curious if anyone can shine a light on: - Does full switch programmability actually matter in production, or is it one of those things th
40.
▲
by
m101
3mo ago
What?
41.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
I don't really see why you think nuclear waste is a large storage problem. If you don't like that website, and as you requested, here's another government resource so i can't be accused of being biased (the government al
42.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
yes! Apparently the rate of penile and throat cancer occurs at only half the rate in men as it does as cervical cancer in women, but the harm caused by the male versions of the cancer are worse, so in actual fact it may overall cause more h
43.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
I have had another experience with Opus 4.8 vs 5.5 which is along the lines of my prior experience of Opus generally having more common sense, whilst GPT is something along the lines of myopic code execution agent: I was asking them each to
44.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
I am not sure you have actually closely read what I have said. Early nuclear builds were cheaper to build: https://gordianknotbook.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/essay... Spent fuel is mostly reusable:
45.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
For the parts of the plant that cannot be put into landfill then storage like any other waste. Given how long they last, and how much energy they output, the waste is still very low per unit energy. Try this: https://gordianknotb
46.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
https://jackdevanney.substack.com/p/nuclear-power-is-too-saf...
47.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
Nuclear used to be built cheaply, before regulatory uncertainty made private construction effectively impossible: https://gordianknotbook.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/essay...
48.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
https://jackdevanney.substack.com/p/how-can-nrc-style-regula...
49.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
https://jackdevanney.substack.com/p/600-year-old-spent-nucle...
50.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
https://jackdevanney.substack.com/p/nuclear-is-too-expensive https://jackdevanney.substack.com/p/what-is-nuclears-should-... https://jackdevanney.substack.com/p/the-two-lies-t
51.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
When the sun shines sure you can power down other power stations, but you still need to maintain them and have them around for when the sun doesn't shine. So when you have lots of intermittent energy it means that you actually cannot s
52.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
100-1000 years order of magnitude. I can't remember exactly, but it's well within our ability to engineer and manage, rather than the signs that try to answer the "how do we communicate danger to later species" types of
53.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
The reason is that your body has mechanisms to fix the problems of radiation. For example, when you drop a stone in water would you say that you "break the surface of the water"? Our DNA is very similar - DNA damage occurs natural
54.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
Ok, in my own words it's something like this: - nuclear waste, after a period of the order of ~10e2/3 years is only dangerous if ingested. So it's as dangerous as any other poisonous substance after that point. There is no ne
55.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
The Gordian Knot and Jack Devanney's website is a goldmine of information which will address almost any question anybody has on the subject.
56.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
If only that were not just the start of the issue. Regulation means nuclear is probably an order of magnitude more expensive than it could be.
57.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
It is depressing reading hacker news threads on nuclear power because of just how misinformed so many people still are. These things are all true, and it's on the reader for not knowing: - nuclear power is expensive by choice. It is no
58.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
My experience of reddit forums is extremely poor. I admit to sometimes wanting to see if I can crack the AI on something, but mostly use it like a search engine for topics I'm not familiar with rather than to speak to/debate.
59.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
I was having a back and forth with Claude over a somewhat controversial topic, and I found it difficult for it to not misinterpret my questions. It was like speaking to a motivated reasoner who misinterpreted the 3 important words because t
60.
▲
by
m101
4mo ago
Yes - I was thinking this - however I had already worked on it so many times with opus and gpt that I thought they had enough time to realise some common sense things that fable just got and understood first time, on the first pass. The dif
More ›