m101

24 ms·

301.
by m101 4y ago
It has +1mm cash (asset) and +1mm liability to depositor
302.
by m101 4y ago
Why not use OneDrive to keep your files synced? That's what I do with keepass
303.
by m101 4y ago
As another comment on here has said so well - how people make their money matters. I believe that crypto generally is a massive scam, so making money from it and donating it to what you think is a good thing is still net bad. I disagree wit
304.
by m101 4y ago
I don't think i am pushing for feeling good. I am just suggesting that we should be the change we want to see at a low level. Be the good neighbour (literally). This change in culture would permeate creating good people, which would co
305.
by m101 4y ago
Firstly, i am developing my own ideas all the time on this. I would suggest that people who want to make a difference with money do so on a local level. If they can create a local eden then perhaps someone else will notice and create anothe
306.
by m101 4y ago
I guess my problem with Singer's should is he's telling others what to do, whereas i think I'm using the word should in telling everyone to do their own thing and make up their own concept of what is good. Own the issue thems
307.
by m101 4y ago
The problem with this stuff is that they are manipulating govt to take people's money in order to promote their own vision of what is good at taxpayer expense. I suppose they think their concept of good is better than everyone else&#x2
308.
by m101 4y ago
Because the only good stuff done is donation of money, with everything else done by salarymen. For me that is something lost.
309.
by m101 4y ago
The problem with effective altruism is that it is devoid from reality: - no country was ever made wealthy by just giving them things. Wealth comes from passing through the difficult stages of development oneself - you personally should do t
310.
by m101 4y ago
China invading Taiwan. Demographic problems (low birth rates).
311.
by m101 4y ago
The problem that we should be talking about is the exact opposite.
312.
by m101 5y ago
A short term price target should incorporate long term cashflow expectations
313.
by m101 5y ago
Well, that's where it comes down to who you are. It is worth it to some, but not to everyone. The problem is that blanket rules are applied to everyone, without compensation. Even those that claim the are doing it to prevent environmen
314.
by m101 5y ago
Whilst the EU's war on waste and reparability legislation may be looked at through rose tinted glasses I think it has a number of negative side effects. 1) cost: The reason goods are cheap is that companies can rely on you needing to r
315.
by m101 5y ago
Good post. Not a fan of Jack though. Maybe I have him all wrong though.
316.
by m101 5y ago
All funds, on average, get the market return. The certain difference with actively managed ones is that they charge a fee, and may pay more in liquidity costs. It's not surprising therefore most underperform. In investing, the first th
317.
by m101 5y ago
Mostly junk IMO, except insofar as there are market participants who trade on the back of it and move prices.
318.
by m101 5y ago
As you can see I don't really know much about this stuff. There's apparently noise in the system - how do we know that the reality is different to the model, and what we are putting down to noise is actually reality being differen
319.
by m101 5y ago
How sure are we that quantum computing will ever work? I think this boils down to whether the wave function collapses as expected(?) Perhaps reality is actually only approximated by the wave function but reality is something else under the
320.
by m101 5y ago
Part of my point is that people's ability to make an algorithm to react quickly is unequal, even if the opportunity to do so is equalised under insider trading regs. The profit will flow towards those with the ability, which the re
321.
by m101 5y ago
Taking the other side of this argument for a second.. Doesn't insider trading just move expected profits from the wide and distributed network of people betting on information gathered through personal networks, and towards the concent
322.
by m101 5y ago
I almost agree with you, except in the instance where a modification might result in dangerous erroneous behaviour of the product - like self-driving cars for instance.
323.
by m101 5y ago
Only mentions puts: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1649339/000156761921...
324.
by m101 5y ago
Ask anyone now whether they would like to go back to live in the days when apparently life was better than it is now.
325.
by m101 5y ago
It was lower prices and app convenience from Uber/Lyft that caused more congestion through increased demand, hence congestion. Not Uber/Lyft themselves. This could have come about in the same way if normal taxi companies had react
326.
by m101 6y ago
The problem here is that we are treating a symptom of legislation and not the cause, as usual. Instead of all trying to agree on a level of tax rates (unrealistic) we could unilaterally slash corporate tax rates and watch the others follow.
327.
by m101 6y ago
I don't really feel discriminating on size is a good idea. Complicated and potentially game-able. If it were up to me I'd bring income, cap gains, and dividend tax rates in line with eachother (or just call them all income), and b
328.
by m101 6y ago
Corporate taxes are the most blindingly stupid idea ever. People forget that the only way to level the playing field between Amazon and local shops is to cut taxes to 0 rather than layering on increasingly complex tax rules. Amazon thrives
329.
by m101 6y ago
Corporate taxes are the most blindingly stupid idea ever. People forget that the only way to level the playing field between Amazon and local shops is to cut taxes to 0 rather than layering on increasingly complex tax rules. Amazon thrives
330.
by m101 6y ago
This comment was very unfairly down-voted in my opinion. I've noticed that hackernews often down-votes some interesting comments. I would say that most people will not vote against the NHS though. They may vote to reform it or get it m

More ›