m0d0nne11

10 ms·

61.
by m0d0nne11 4y ago
I got a Bash-N-Scrape kitchen tool 20 yrs ago that I still use everyday and it always makes me think of the person who gave it to me.
62.
by m0d0nne11 4y ago
Why the content-free click-bait headline? Why not honor us all by providing enough info so we can make an informed choice about whether we're likely to be interested?
63.
by m0d0nne11 4y ago
Why, oh why do people use precious, content-free headlines?
64.
by m0d0nne11 4y ago
Please stop linking to paywalled content.
65.
by m0d0nne11 4y ago
Twitter is the highest quality source of info avilable for this?
66.
by m0d0nne11 5y ago
Clickbait content-free headline
67.
by m0d0nne11 5y ago
Is there some way to delete/filter/downvote click-bait header lines on HN like this one?
68.
by m0d0nne11 5y ago
How about a headline that isn't such irritating, content-free click-bait?
69.
by m0d0nne11 6y ago
<sigh!> The fatuous use of animated images to illustrate the wonders of a tool that is fundamentally text/character based is (ahem!) puzzling, considering that those most likely to be interested are also those most likely to wish
70.
by m0d0nne11 7y ago
I'm another who recalls this mess being used (1990 or so) as the acid test for C compilers, source code analyzers and debuggers. I can still picture the look of pride on a certain salesman's face when he demoed a valgrind-like to
71.
by m0d0nne11 7y ago
Ummmm, should I be worried that I bookmarked this for "later" ?
72.
by m0d0nne11 7y ago
I note that Roger Cicala over at lensrentals.com (in an interesting article showing disassembly of a fancy zoom unit) had this to say: No, no it can't. It was really impressive mathematics (and according to several mathematicians, the
73.
by m0d0nne11 7y ago
The rules of effective, efficient discussion are universal; if they're ignored in various settings I'll consider offering a cash wager that those are rarely settings (engineering, surgery, etc) in which careful thought and attenti
74.
by m0d0nne11 8y ago
Count yourself lucky. Hoorah! for any alternative to Disqus, of course, but OMG the layout of their WWW page is heinously awful example of what can happen when children are permitted to do CSS.
75.
by m0d0nne11 8y ago
We see what you did there, providing an example of not mentioning numbers too soon in the process, right? Except that in this case it seems.... slippery. Hmmmm.
76.
by m0d0nne11 9y ago
Email has been crap ever since the Sooper Jeenyus children at Micro$oft and @pple foisted WWW browsers on us as email readers. I still use MH/exmh despite the inconvenience because I nurture the illusion that my personal info is sligh
77.
by m0d0nne11 9y ago
And, as if to further illustrate the problem with dysfunctional WWW stuff, the ony way to comment on that article is via Disqus...
78.
by m0d0nne11 9y ago
This is the same NetFlix behind the death-penalty-for-even-trivial-DRM-infractions movement, yes?
79.
by m0d0nne11 9y ago
A single screenshot with no accompanying explanation? Is there a clearer indicaton of contempt for the readers?
80.
by m0d0nne11 9y ago
May it EVER be so...!
81.
by m0d0nne11 9y ago
Irritating click-bait National Enquirer-style title (and content, to some extent) should instead have been something like: Decentralized distribution of Crypto-currencies is still a problem.
82.
by m0d0nne11 9y ago
Yet another pay-walled posting on HN...
83.
by m0d0nne11 9y ago
Content-free click-bait "summary" ? HN expects better...
84.
by m0d0nne11 9y ago
Click-bait header lines always suck, but especially on HN.
85.
by m0d0nne11 10y ago
Very useful, as is the one for AWS. Yay! though if these things are being touted as "plain English" they should probably steer rigorously clear of smart-ass insider references (no matter how full of cheer the writer may be feeli
86.
by m0d0nne11 11y ago
"We’ve made it clearer that tagging a company on a project may notify them by email." I had not previously heard of AngelList but I am grateful that this declaration appeared early in these comments as I can now stop reading, know