Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lynx23
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
75 ms
·
961.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
Sorry, I was not trying to belittle your effort, not at all. In fact, its sort of the other way around. You inspired me enough today (basically because I had to deep-dive and try to debug a problem which turned out to be an openai python
962.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
In Emacs: C-u M-| completions RET
963.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
$ cat ~/.config/openai/completions.json ~/.local/bin/completions { "model": "text-davinci-003", "max_tokens": 1024 } #!/bin/sh jq --rawfile prompt /dev/stdi
964.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
Found it! I need to set NETRC=/dev/null. It appears the request library is trying to grab auth info from .netrc, and in my case, picks the default entry. Why it is doing that despite an api key being provided is unclear.
965.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
I know, I took a look at the code. I even replaced get_openai_key(params) with a hardcoded return "sk-redacted" and still no luck. I guess the bug must be in the openai python package, but I cant find it either. However,
966.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
Yes, this works. So my api key is valid. But something in chatblade or the python packages it depends on trashes the input I provide, and replaces it with an email address of mine. Sounds weird, but is apparently true.
967.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
That is what is strange about it, OPENAI_API_KEY is set correctly, and start with sk- So I wonder where it is getting this email from.
968.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
This looks great. However, after generting an API key and providing it to chatblade, I get the following error: openai.error.AuthenticationError: Incorrect API key provided: user@dom***.tld. You can find your API key at https://
969.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
Yes, it is acceptable. Nobody is entitled to expect a coworker to work outside of payed hours. If you think you are entitled to that, I believe you should move to China or North Korea. Are you a founder, perhaps? Or just a toxic individu
970.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
"Absolutely necessary" is your personal opinion. I, for one, disagree with that.
971.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
It is hard to explain, but this headline makes me sad, very sad. Not because german children are supposedly put at risk, not at all... It is the tone of finger pointing. Risk is what eventually makes us grow. A totally risk free world/
972.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
If this is a "non-recoverable blow" then those people were likely not as smart as claimed to begin with...
973.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
I ment "you likely typoed that word because you unconsciously dont believe in what you said", which is, stretching the coloquial meaning a bit, a "freudian slip". But reading your text, it is probably useless to talk to
974.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
So hope for the unconditional basic income or become water ...
975.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
Remember how the universe works? It doesnt care about the well-being of individuals. Thats just a fact of life. Demanding equality of outcome was always an illusion, doubly so in the face of big changes.
976.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
Two things to note: No, indeed, if I see an extinction event in the distance future, I dont feel a need to act. It is hard to explain, but I dont feel responsible for human kind. Its a nice experiment, and I love to be part of it at the s
977.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
reptuations, that was a freudian slip, right? Reputation is obviously in the eye of the beholder... What is one persons reputable source, is a money making machine without conscience for others.
978.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
This!
979.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
I think you are drawing an arbitrary line to defend an industry that doesnt deserve it at all. In my book, even the supposedly important news are pure poison for the individual, and at the end of the day, unimportant as well. People that ne
980.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
Control freak, by any chance? Is it really so hard to just "go with the flow"?
981.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
I must have missed that, me not being a company and all that. All I remember was a lot of glass hype, followed by the message that Google has actually stopped selling glass for "normal" customers... So at least in my world, the pa
982.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
As far as I understand it, "everybody" was manipulated into thinking it is around the corner by media babbling about the new exciting developments from high profile companies like Google. It rememeber that time quite vividly. It
983.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
You're using the word "defect" to describe someone pulling their money from a bank? Seriously? It is so easy to assign blame apparently...
984.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
Google Glass, Google Car, Google Plus... Its always the same pattern. A lot of pre-release advertisment, followed by a release of a beta version and another press release declaring the end of the product. At this point, I wouldn't ado
985.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
Medical error is the third leading cause of death in the US at least. Given that data, I am assuming the chances of a human being held accountable for their errors in medicine is also almost zero. It might not be ccompletely zero, but I
986.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
Likely because a pint of Ben & Jerry's will not quiet down your default mode network as much as some psychedelica do.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Default_mode_network#Modulatio...
987.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
And, what difference does it make being able to find the individual responsible, and figuring out that the system is protecting him from liabilities? What I am trying to say here is, there isnt much difference between zero and almost zero.
988.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
The chance of a doctor being held accountable for the medical errors they make is lower then you might expect. I could tell you a story about that. Lost my eyesight at the age of 5 because I happened to meet the wrong doctor at the wrong
989.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
Well, I'd argue if the first two high penalties did not have an effect, the company is likely rotten from within and can not really be fixed, so close it. Also, I find your "but you have to think about the children^WJobs" arg
990.
▲
by
lynx23
4y ago
Leaking user data isn't really penalized enough. First two incidents, high monetary penalty, third incident, company is closed permanently in the interest of public security.
More ›