Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lxgr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
901.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
Surely IPv6 support will spontaneously materialize on their networks once their pain becomes big enough!
902.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
Annoying things such as paying taxes, recycling/not polluting etc.? Some things really can only be solved via central coordination, as there is no natural game-theoretic/purely economic path from one local minimum to another. Bein
903.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
> nobody cares about NAT at home. Only because most people don't know how NAT is hurting them, and because corporations have spent incredible resources on hacking around the problem for when peer to peer is required (essentially onl
904.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
Satellite unicast receivers also can't be located. Iridium pagers were (maybe still are?) a thing, for example. However, carrying one of these is probably highly suspicious compared to a world band radio receiver.
905.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
There are still quite a few shortwave radio stations broadcasting.
906.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
> Obviously it's "good enough" for "most people". Otherwise nobody would be using the free version of ChatGPT today. I'd say it's better than nothing, which to me is not the same thing at all as "g
907.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
They're essentially replying based on vibes, instead of grounding their responses in extensive web searches, which is what the paid models/configurations generally do. This makes them wrong more often than they're right for a
908.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
Have you used GPT instant or mini yourself? I think it’s pretty cynical to assume that this is “good enough for most people”, even if they don’t know the difference between that and better models.
909.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
I’ve already had a few services lock me out with iCloud Private Relay.
910.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
How do you square "complete privacy" with the fact that you're authenticating to these VPNs with a persistent username or other credential and are then sending traffic through them, both from an IP address that might identify
911.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
I'm forced to use a VPN to occasionally check my US bank account, since a foreign IP address is obviously a harbinger of unspeakable evil (while the friendly Youtube advertised neighborhood VPN is obviously evidence of pure intentions)
912.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
So the stable state here is all humans eventually being locked out? (Bots are getting better every day; I doubt the same is true for all humans, including those with weird browsers or networks unwilling to install some dystopian Cloudflare
913.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
Yet here I am drowning in captchas every once in a while, so it's quite a big worry for me. Maybe I just have to disable all ad blockers and Safari tracking prevention? Or I guess I could send a link to a scan of my photo ID in a custo
914.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
I could definitely imagine a public IPv4 with lots of good, logged-in Cloudflare traffic to act as a positive signal for their heuristics, possibly even overriding the Firefox penalty.
915.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
To be fair, this sometimes seems on the ad blocker. I've definitely seen mine accidentally nuke part of the payment Javascript (or maybe the 3DS iframe?) because some substring of it matched some common ad URL, which is obviously unrec
916.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
That's my favorite combination: Shitty bot detection meeting shitty payment security systems. At least outside the US, there's 3DS as an (admittedly often high friction) high quality cardholder verification method, but in the US,
917.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
No, but it's entirely within TSA's hands to make that process as frictionless as possible. (It's a different question whether zero friction is actually desired, or whether some security theater is actually part of the service
918.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
No, using a stupid authentication/verification method with lots of false positives is always on whoever deploys it. Imagine an apartment building with a flimsy front door lock that breaks all the time, and the landlord only telling you
919.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
> I’ve been getting it in safari too. I'm getting it on iCloud Private Relay all the time. It honestly makes it kind of useless. Maybe that's the point? But then again, doesn't Cloudflare run part of it!? And wasn't t
920.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
It's absurd how unusable Cloudflare is making the web when using a browser or IP address they consider "suspicious". I've lately been drowning in captchas for the crime of using Firefox. All in the interest of "bot
921.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
> I mean, that's like saying are you sure that your antivirus would prevent every possible virus? Yes, I'm saying it's pretty much as bad as antivirus software. > Are you sure that you haven't made some mistake in
922.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
Until it gets prompt injected. Are you reading every single file your agent reads as part of the tasks you give it, including content fetched from the web or third-party packages?
923.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
> for some reason they want it to live under your user account The entire idea of Openclaw (i.e., the core point of what distinguishes it from agents like Claude Code) is to give it access to your personal data, so it can act as your ass
924.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
It works well so far, for you . Are you confident it would still work against sophisticated prompt injection attacks that override your "strongly worded message"? Strongly worded signs can be great for safety (actual mechanisms p
925.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
> a custom implementation of "rm" that Anthropic can add guardrails to Wrong layer. You want the deletion to actually be impossible from a privilege perspective, not be made practically harder to the entity that shouldn't
926.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
Not in unknown ways, but as part of its regular operation (with cloud inference)! I think the actual data flow here is really hard to grasp for many users: Sandboxing helps with limiting the blast radius of the agent itself, but the agent i
927.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
I feel like key revocation is usually solved via key replacement in most secure instant messengers. Every implementation that I know (which does not include SimpleX) offers some way to recover from complete key loss, at which point other pa
928.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
I tried to figure out its identity model and failed, and I consider myself somewhat familiar with encrypted IM protocols. How should non-technical users ever figure this out? And if they don't need to, and it just works as a regular en
929.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
A database storing data? Now I’ve seen everything!
930.
▲
by
lxgr
7mo ago
This conversation is about banks, not the IRS, at least to my understanding.
More ›