lwhi

5 ms·

31.
by lwhi 4mo ago
If a product is genuinely dangerous to society, self regulation cannot be a suitable harness. If only we had effective governments that could regulate industry. If a nuclear weapon was developed today, would it be down to industry to self r
32.
by lwhi 4mo ago
It's unfortunately just slop.
33.
by lwhi 4mo ago
Honestly, I don't think this actually provided much above a paragraph of text. The visuals didn't show much, and I learnt a lot more from one of the YouTube videos ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCO633KE7RA ) pos
34.
by lwhi 4mo ago
Great video. I didn't know I was so interested in engine design before I watched it.
35.
by lwhi 4mo ago
The part that disturbs me most, is that the model won't reveal you've reached the threshold. It's literally been designed to gaslight its users in these cases.
36.
by lwhi 4mo ago
Anti-competitive behaviour.
37.
by lwhi 4mo ago
I can see where you're coming from. We exchange our knowledge, time, and skill for money. If this exchange is no longer viable — because similar value can be accessed via LLM agents — we'll have no way of making money. I do think
38.
by lwhi 4mo ago
I agree. I suppose, my best guess is that a team will be reduced to one or two people; the those that are left will be judged solely on outcomes. Two (human) brains are always useful; the benefit of a human in these scenarios is that we can
39.
by lwhi 4mo ago
We won't be programmers in this scenario. The results will hopefully be a lot more tangible.
40.
by lwhi 4mo ago
Surely you can judge people by results though?
41.
by lwhi 4mo ago
Well, yes .. but they're going to need people to do their evil bidding /s
42.
by lwhi 4mo ago
I think in the future, those who succeed will be equivalent to wayfinders. People who _can_ see the wood for the trees, and are able to understand multiple (sometimes conflicting) requirements and work out a way through that solves the prob
43.
by lwhi 4mo ago
Exactly. In all cases the first priority of a police officer will be to preserve life. There's no policy in place that would supercede this. I'm stick of having to listen to these uniformed arguments. There's no good that com
44.
by lwhi 4mo ago
At the the end of the day, you're just a common or garden racist. The main problem, is that you're trying to intellectualise your prejudice; which is quite frankly dangerous. You should be ashamed of yourself.
45.
by lwhi 4mo ago
I'm sorry, I think you're full of 'nonsense'.
46.
by lwhi 4mo ago
A lot of words, but not much substance. You haven't linked to the specific policy that led to this awful event occurring. Which specific policy wording enabled this to happen?
47.
by lwhi 4mo ago
> You're saying that allegations of two-tier policing are far-right disinformation. No. I am saying that this one event is being used as ammunition by racist organisations to further their aims. One officer was filmed on body cam ar
48.
by lwhi 4mo ago
And what's your point?
49.
by lwhi 4mo ago
You are simply racist.
50.
by lwhi 4mo ago
No. You are incorrect. There was no policy in place that made the officer behave in this way. The police officer made a huge mistake. It's as simple as that. Racist groups are using this ammunition to suggest we need to undo the progre
51.
by lwhi 4mo ago
I'll make this simple for you. The behaviour of one officer does not mean that we should no longer live in a diverse society. This is one incident. The officer is question made a terrible call. The fact that people like you are using t
52.
by lwhi 4mo ago
It's really not that complicated. If we have fewer non-white police officers, our ability to keep the whole of our (gratefully diverse) population safe is at a disadvantage. We need a police force that accurately represents the full ra
53.
by lwhi 4mo ago
What type of response is expected?
54.
by lwhi 5mo ago
Gives me PTSD too!
55.
by lwhi 5mo ago
This reminds me of the time we needed to support IE6.
56.
by lwhi 5mo ago
I found it annoying .. but I know lots of people who liked it.
57.
by lwhi 5mo ago
I think sometimes the distinction is made between natural and artificial (human made) as a way to sway an argument. In many of these cases, the reasoning is tenuous if we examine with an understanding that the difference is sometimes arbitr
58.
by lwhi 5mo ago
Isn't Cynefine a framework designed to sell consultancy services? I think complexity is a byword for 'unintentionally complicated' here.
59.
by lwhi 5mo ago
In which case maybe they're best suited to not leading a team.
60.
by lwhi 5mo ago
Many of these factors are directly influenced by complexity.

More ›