lwhi

23 ms·

421.
by lwhi 3y ago
Automated deployments require planning before the time they're executed. If code is involved, someone likely reviews and approves it. There are naturally far more safeguards in place than there would be for a manual deployment.
422.
by lwhi 3y ago
These messages are backed up regularly using third party servers. Does this affect security?
423.
by lwhi 3y ago
Standardisation is not a bad thing. I think your analogy is flawed.
424.
by lwhi 3y ago
It's not easy to do everything well .. and each stage of the process requires expertise. It's fairly good logic.
425.
by lwhi 3y ago
This is all very well, but not providing us with the details of why the bull was dead is just plain mean.
426.
by lwhi 3y ago
To be totally fair, it does look like his Labour party will be the next gov.
427.
by lwhi 3y ago
Won't everyone just use a VPN?
428.
by lwhi 3y ago
I was responding to a comment directly mentioning 'security'
429.
by lwhi 3y ago
Hmm, might want to reconsider that [1] [1] https://www.theregister.com/2017/11/28/root_access_bypass_ma... .
430.
by lwhi 3y ago
I suppose 2024 will be the year of the Linux desktop ...
431.
by lwhi 3y ago
Congestion charges work. They discourage journeys taken by car; reducing traffic, easing pollution and improving health.
432.
by lwhi 3y ago
Surely the issue is the broken healthcare system in the US? Proactive care is good. Testing is good. However the insurance / healthcare cartel behaviour that's fuelled as a result is devastatingly expensive.
433.
by lwhi 3y ago
Fundamentally, because we are still worth something even when our achievements are completely removed. If you take the view that our achievements are necessarily integral to our self worth this logically isn't true.
434.
by lwhi 3y ago
Robotic arm decorated with glass.
435.
by lwhi 3y ago
Exactly. The nice thing about being part of the EU was that we had a second level of sanity involved in our jurisdiction .. especially important when we have inept dangerous parties in control.
436.
by lwhi 3y ago
Socially engineered hacks are also a danger. You might not care about what's contained in a certain online account, but there could be utility in taking control.
437.
by lwhi 3y ago
It's not pragmatic, it's dangerous. Sooner or later someone could take control of one of the accounts you don't care about and use in a way you don't expect to gain control of things you do care about.
438.
by lwhi 3y ago
I think your question is too broad. As soon as you restrict yourself to a specific stack, you'll be able to find out by researching via the web.
439.
by lwhi 3y ago
How is this a hot take if you just made it up?
440.
by lwhi 3y ago
As we're talking about writing: *past
441.
by lwhi 3y ago
Absolutely not true. There's still an incentive to be the company that replaces the technology. FUD.
442.
by lwhi 4y ago
What you're describing sounds very asinine. I think it's probably because most consumers don't have such a very sweet tooth.
443.
by lwhi 4y ago
I'm sorry, but we'd be a hell of a lot worse off without the BBC. For all its flaws, it does a huge amount of good. All reporting will inevitably hold a bias simply because selection of story for time scheduled news will _always_
444.
by lwhi 4y ago
It's useful to the business as soon as they're forced to be responsible.
445.
by lwhi 4y ago
True, but I think constraints are essential for creativity. Whether it's artistic or scientific .. maybe it can feel a bit academic when we have so much memory and processing power available, but I personally think it really makes a di
446.
by lwhi 4y ago
I disagree. I think constraints (such as memory availablity) are a useful device to encourage creativity.
447.
by lwhi 4y ago
Difficult to find a word for 'snow globe' too ..
448.
by lwhi 4y ago
What's flattery plus?
449.
by lwhi 4y ago
Why?
450.
by lwhi 4y ago
Culture is the recipe; the combination of attributes that makes it distinctive.

More ›