lwat

44 ms·

1. 451.▲
   by lwat 16y ago

   We just want to know what the flaw in his reasoning is.
2. 452.▲
   by lwat 16y ago

   Cause frankly, the invention sucks.
3. 453.▲
   by lwat 16y ago

   The point is that it DOESNT MATTER what the scales or methodology was. There is no study or methodology or renumbered axis that will place alcohol to the left and bottom of marijuana. All that matters is that alcohol is above N2O and that h
4. 454.▲
   by lwat 16y ago

   I believe he is not confirming or denying the allegations. Make of that what you will.
5. 455.▲
   by lwat 16y ago

   Yea but I have to learn Javascript anyway (client side apps) so why hate on it just because it could be better than it is? It's not that horrible of a language, I mean it's not nearly as bad as PHP and loads of people like PHP while almost
6. 456.▲
   by lwat 16y ago

   This book really convinced me that Javascript can be awesome: http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596517748 And of course there's all these fancy new things being built on top of it, like CoffeeScript. I just recently realized that it's not th
7. 457.▲
   by lwat 16y ago

   Googler's Exposé Of Sketchy SEO Company or Googlers Expose Sketchy SEO Company
8. 458.▲
   by lwat 16y ago

   I think you're mistaken, his calculating is not dependent on click-through rates.
9. 459.▲
   by lwat 16y ago

   Why sad? Javascript is a great language, way ahead of it's time. Don't confuse browser DOM compatibility disasters for Javascript fail.
10. 460.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    Any ads for those?
11. 461.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    A regular ball and separate kinetic energy source would be cheaper than this device. And would work better. There's no upside here.
12. 462.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    No. These people took a cheap ball and a cheap kinetic energy device and combined them into an expensive thing that's bad at being a ball and bad at being an energy source. This sucks.
13. 463.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    You are so wrong I can't even begin to argue with you about this.
14. 464.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    So where do you want to draw the line on this graph? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9c/Rational_...
15. 465.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    Neither is this
16. 466.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    That has nothing to do with this article. I can install EC2 instances of PostgreSQL or any other good free database too if I want. Hell there's EC2 instances with built-in SQL Server for minimal extra cost if you want the real high-end stuf
17. 467.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    You mean pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis right?
18. 468.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    What about aluminium oxide, does that count?
19. 469.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    How do you wash your teflon pans?
20. 470.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    Silica is one of the most abundant oxides in the earths crust. Our bodies have no problem dealing with it.
21. 471.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    At least a good spell check!
22. 472.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    The apps are uninstallable because the carriers are getting paid for those apps to be there. If they let you uninstall they don't maximize their income.
23. 473.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    I meant the 2600 i7 chips. What is AMDs answer to that?
24. 474.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    I wonder if this has anything to do with the very cheap Sandy Bridge line just launched by Intel. $300 for a chip that competes with $1200 chips is pretty tough to beat.
25. 475.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    $rename will not magically remove the expense of updating millions of rows in your data store (compared to updating a single row in a normalised DB)
26. 476.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    I'm not disagreeing with you, all I'm saying is that SQL Server databases are built from the ground up to resist data corruption and does exceedingly well at it. Not so with NoSQL data stores.
27. 477.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    If the amount of data you're storing is so small you should definitely consider de-normalizing it until it's easy enough to work with. When you eventually scale up to millions of Foos you'll probably want to get it back to 3NF. There is not
28. 478.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    What I'm saying is that I can go up to my SQL server and disconnect the power cord and my database will not be corrupt when I start it back up. Sure if your HDD gets taken out by a meteor then nothing will save you but that's why you have b
29. 479.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    We have exactly the same kind of data relationships in our database. Sure it's complicated and in your example sure you'll end up with a bunch of tables if you normalize it all the way to 3NF. But there's a lot of GOOD STUFF you get when yo
30. 480.▲
    by lwat 16y ago

    "Sometimes, data doesn't fit a relational model well." I keep hearing this but I've yet to see any good examples.