Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lurr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
> This is a crazy way for young people to think though and the opposite of how they should be thinking I dunno, seems like this sort of risk is the only way to get anywhere now.
62.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
They did it themselves by showing bias in the US elections. He doesn't need to be a russian stooge to have credibility drop to the level of fox news.
63.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
> 2. "Most of Wikileaks' critics have 3 (((brackets around their names))) & have black-rim glasses. Bizarre. Tribalist symbol for establishment climbers?" I'm confused, isn't the (((3 brackets))) a white supr
64.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
> I think it's impressive that the media made you think he was the one responsible for that narrative because he was. Is the media responsible for the wikileaks twitter account now?
65.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
I don't think saying "find a mate" on hacker news is the problem. Why nitpick trivial things like this on someone you have never met?
66.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
> It's astounding to me that you find "creeps, weirdos, nerds and morons without friends" to be a worse fate than "On a bad day he just sits and pretends he is a transit driver, going through the routes in his mind,
67.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
Except US citizens, in a lot of cases. Reason is they want to avoid SEC Wrath for sketchy shit.
68.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
Plus no one really owns anything.
69.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
If you're talking about Damore then I believe that's less about what was said and more about how it was stated.
70.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
But less turnout than Obama. Disastrously less.
71.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
See, this is why evil is better. Less whataboutism. Of course I believe that the republican parties current path will lead to the destruction of America. So I'm probably not worth talking to.
72.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
Okay, but they are also doing nothing about the monopolies.
73.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
> Instead of trying to block that from happening, since it's Republicans who are trying to do that. They are? Which bills?
74.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
Okay, how about shortsighted, stupid, corrupt, etc...? This also sounds like an argument for political correctness.
75.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
Then why didn't clinton win easily?
76.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
> Given how completely Twitter, Facebook, Google, et al censor right-leaning political opinions Right-leaning opinions which violate their TOS. big difference. I'm pro merit based immigration and feel entirely comfortable tweeting t
77.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
It's something to use for undecided voters and something to rile up the democratic base.
78.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
I am pro net neutrality and unwilling to reveal my real name. I'm also not an elected representative of the people.
79.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
> I personally would be happier if there were national incentives to keep nuclear plants and not coal operating as long as safely possible Why? I get coal, but why not operate the nuclear plants if they are already running?
80.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
Good, force people to put their name behind an issue.
81.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
"I won't work with someone who thinks I'm less capable because of my genitals" sounds a bit more valid to me.
82.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
Well no, if someone went crazy and tried to murder him over this that would be a pretty inappropriate response. I do get your point though.
83.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
No, not at all. I meant conservatives/Damore supporters. The argument hinges on free speech, respect for differing opinions, oppression of conservative viewpoints, etc... That's all fine but then I see a lot of jumping to "yo
84.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
I think insisting that they need more use cases for generics is dishonest when you consider they used generics to implement library data types themselves. I don't mean they are outright lying, or are bad people or anything like that.
85.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
> That's a defensible approach, even today Not if you are dishonest about it. Not if you refuse to learn from the past couple decades.
86.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
I want to stick something in my trunk, I need to take my dog to the kennel, I want to go camping, I want to go to the middle or oregon to watch the eclipse, etc... As for why it's dystopian. I'm now supposed to be entirely depende
87.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
Still say this sounds like a dystopia.
88.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
> it’s even more depressing than we could have imagined. I don't see it as depressing that they think this. It's depressing that they could be right. > “more than half (54%) of global auto executives say they believe these v
89.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
My first thought as well. Are they excluded for going public? Weren't they over a billion well before that? Or did they not take outside money?
90.
▲
by
lurr
9y ago
I didn't say everyone was outraged. You don't there are women at Google who say this memo as yet another attack on the idea that they are just as capable as their male counterparts?
More ›