Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
luriel
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
35 ms
·
331.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
Given that is well known Go was developed mainly in a 64bit environment and that the 64bit compilers produce much faster code and have been much more tested than the 32bit toolchain, to the point that some people have complained that Go fav
332.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
For those that were asking about real systems built with Go. Canonical used Go to build the backend for the Juju Charm Store: https://plus.google.com/107994348420168435683/posts/fdMcwvCq...
333.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
> The kernel may be the core of a Linux system, but neither users nor applications deal with the kernel directly. The amount of complexity in a modern libc, glibc in particular, is mind-boggling. One thing I love about Go is that it com
334.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
XML Schema is so incredibly complex than even XML advocates avoid it.
335.
▲
Go Version 1 now on App Engine
(googleappengine.blogspot.com.au)
42 points
by
luriel
15y ago
|
16 comments
336.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
Of particular interest is the paper on Plan 9's security model: http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/4th_edition/papers/auth
337.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
> I guess I'm not terribly impressed. It actually makes me long for the simplicity of C. You might want to try Go. One of the great things about Go is that is almost completely devoid of 'magic', and what it says is what it does, and wh
338.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
Friedman was not a conservative, he was a liberal (in the original sense of the word, and the sense still used everywhere outside the US): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNc2vzVsIM4
339.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
> 1) He was in favor of some government action, most notably monetary policy.[0] Not really, he actually was in favor of privately issued competing currencies, but he was a realist and realized this was not politically possible, so he a
340.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
You have to understand that the IP industry sees public domain content as competition, they want to restrict the amount of stuff in the public domain as much as possible. Also, if people get used to things being in the public domain, they m
341.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
Just a note: The Go distribution itself is full of great examples of Go code, including several uses of the template package, for example in godoc. Don't be afraid to read the code in the stdlib, is very readable.
342.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
Sorry, I'm not familiar with Windows stuff. This library might be more what you have in mind then: https://github.com/AllenDang/w32
343.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
Here is a (very incomplete) list of organizations using Go in production: http://go-lang.cat-v.org/organizations-using-go Note that this was before Go even had a stable release, and while the language was still evolving very fast, I'd exp
344.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
There is also a custom search engine: http://go-lang.cat-v.org/go-search
345.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
I haven't tried it, but you might want to look into WALK(Windows Application Library Kit): https://github.com/lxn/walk Is designed to provide a Go-ish interface for win32.
346.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
The point of patents is not to protect anyone, but to encourage innovation. It has become quite clear that patents make innovation harder (is impossible to create anything anymore without taking a big risk of infringing someone else's pat
347.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
Patents are artificial government granted monopolies. Such monopolies are in no way good for consumers.
348.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
So called "Intellectual Property" is not really property from either a moral or a legal standpoint. Intellectual property is a form of government granted temporary monopoly, supposedly in the name of encouraging progress and the common go
349.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
Many of the people Obama has appointed to top positions in the DoJ are ex RIAA/MPAA folks.
350.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
Aren't Go channels similar to typed pipes?
351.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
Just because data is in a text stream doesn't mean it is not structured. Awk is designed to handle structured text for example, the output of most (traditional) Unix tools is 'structured' too (eg., ls and ps). I recommend you read The Unix
352.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
Another really cool project by Russ Cox, is amazing how prolific he is. A related project of his that might be of interest to people learning about kernel programming is the documented history of the Plan 9 kernel: http://swtch.com/plan9hi
353.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
> You can see examples of the hole by looking at Go's container/* container/* is a bit of a corner case which is rarely used, specially since append() was added to the language and container/vector was deprecated I can't remember the l
354.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
or Go.
355.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
You make a very good point. And I think it is no coincidence that the creator of Unix is one of the designers of Go, a language that shares Unix's conceptual and implementation simplicity, makes very conscious tradeoffs and where channels w
356.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
UI programming doesn't need to be callback heavy. Rob Pike designed one of the spiritual ancestors of Go, Squeak ( http://doc.cat-v.org/bell_labs/squeak/ ) using the CSP model of concurrency specially to build (G)UIs.
357.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
If panic/recover is the same as exceptions, why does everyone whine about the lack of exceptions? The fact is that while in theory panic/recover are mostly equivalent to exceptions, in practice they are very, very different. Panic is only u
358.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
> no exceptions This is one of my favorite features of Go. Exceptions are a horrible mess in every language I have seen that has them. They make following control flow basically impossible. They are equivalent to COME FROM. Go's multipl
359.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
> There were several high quality promotional videos when it was first released. There was video of a talk given by Rob, and a short video intro by Russ Cox. That was pretty much it. > it has a ton of documentation, including transl
360.
▲
by
luriel
15y ago
I have met Shapiro and he is a very nice and smart guy, but I find it rather shocking that somebody could invest so much time and effort in designing new language before building a library to do something as fundamental as I/O. Is interesti
More ›