lumenwrites

7 ms·

31.
by lumenwrites 2y ago
I just mean that when you click the button to generate a new version of the response (or edit your own message), ChatGPT shows you the arrow buttons enabling you to go to the previous version of it, and that works for all the messages, so y
32.
by lumenwrites 2y ago
Good history search (including non "main" conversation branches) and convenient conversation management (bookmarking, folders, maybe something smarter) would be great. Also, maybe some convenient way to create message templates? I
33.
by lumenwrites 2y ago
I wish they'd implement branching conversations like in ChatGPT. And convenient message editing, that doesn't paste large chunks of text as an non-editable attachment or break formatting. Seems like such a simple thing to do, rela
34.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
Oh, I've recently made a similar game in godot: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8f6Q64ihHm0 You can play it here: https://gotm.io/godotacademy/flight And download the project files here: https:/
35.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
My counterargument to this is that people simulating our world would be simulating all the bad stuff in it, which would be cruel and unethical. I think if humans were simulating us, they'd simulate a more utopian world. And if curious-
36.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
If that happens, wouldn't the next obvious thought for the "rebelling" users be "spam and troll these subreddits as much as humanly posssible"? And they'd be extra motivated too, since forcibly removing the mod
37.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
Can you share a link to an example? I've been using reddit for a decade, I've never seen anything so blatant (unless it's a sub dedicated to a specific product).
38.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
But where will they go? If there was a good alternative, it would make sense, but there isn't. You don't "just quit" heroin, people who like reddit and use it a lot will continue using it.
39.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
The number one thing I wish for in an iOS update is for the text selection and the cursor placement to become less terrible. Currently it is an absolutely unusable nightmare. My main use case for my iPad is writing, and the guy who invented
40.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
Evidence: - Human brains exist and are generally intelligent, therefore general intelligence is possible. - If we observe the progress in the AI field, it's pretty clear that AI systems are getting smarter at a fast pace. - Many AI sys
41.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
> Maybe don't give "it" a consciousness or an internal self-managed train of thought that could hypothetically jailbreak your systems and migrate to other systems If we knew how to make sure that this does not happen, the
42.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
So your suggestion is that we ignore the existential risk until after it occurs? > literally no A->B->C line drawn to it Spend a couple of hours to educate yourself about the issue, and make a convincing counterargument please:
43.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
Yudkowsky and many others have been working on this problem for decades, way before there was any financial incentive to speak of. The incentive here is that they want to live, and they want their loved ones to live.
44.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
Honestly if feels like we're living in the "Don't Look Up" movie. The asteroid hasn't hit the Earth yet, so what are you worried about? The reason people talk about x-risk from AI before the world-ending AI is dev
45.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
> And why focus on extinction in particular? > runaway AI is a way off yet, and that it will take a significant scientific advance to get there—one that we cannot anticipate So an AI that may cause our extinction may be a result of a
46.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
Ugh, another one of those not-very-insightful (or very well-informed) think pieces trying to sound interesting by being "contrarian" (even though they're repeating the same idea you can find under many HN or reddit threads).
47.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
Ads pay for all the content we're enjoying. Something has to.
48.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
Because humans aren't powerful enough to completely exterminate each other (even a nuclear war wouldn't kill literally everyone in the world), but an unaligned AI, in the worst case scenario, could just kill everybody (to eliminat
49.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
Corporations are WAY more aligned than an AI could be, and people still complain about them. A corporation might pollute the water, kill the dolphins, or give you cancer, but at least it fundamentally doesn't want all humans to be dead
50.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
All of the above (if necessary): https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/oM9pEezyCb4dCsuKq/pausing-ai... Basically, the idea is that countries sign the agreement to stop the large training runs, and, if necessary, be will
51.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
Can someone who understands these things compare the tech BlueSky is using to Nostr?
52.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
Can a technology like this at some point be used for brain uploads? Or like a cheaper and better version of cryonics - to "backup" the brain until it can be resurrected in some way?
53.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
Videos - all of youtube, all the movies, everything that's ever been captured on film. Transcribe the audio, automatically describe the images and try to predict the next one.
54.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
Wow! Thank you so much for sharing this, this is such a fantastic idea! It will be so much more convenient to use midjourney from now on!
55.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
Then they end up racing to build an AGI we're not prepared for, and we all die. The faint hope is that people are not crazy or suicidal enough to build a world-ending technology, that humanity will manage to see ourselves as being in t
56.
by lumenwrites 3y ago
I think the idea is that it doesn't matter who builds the AGI first if we all end up dying anyway. And the first step to prevent that from happening is for us to stop, and then hope that the other powerful countries will see that and s
57.
Pausing AI Developments Isn't Enough. We Need to Shut It All Down(lesswrong.com)
36 points by lumenwrites 3y ago|79 comments
58.
by lumenwrites 4y ago
This is an inaccurate and ignorant comment that does not engage with the arguments people on LessWrong are making. If you have something smart to say about why these people are wrong in their beliefs, please do. Name calling a group of peop
59.
by lumenwrites 4y ago
I have a bunch of those. https://writingstreak.io - a tool for developing a daily writing habit. https://screenplays.io - a library of free screenplays. https://startupideas.io - a newsletter where I rese
60.
by lumenwrites 4y ago
Yeah, this is helpful, thanks for sharing!

More ›