luke5441

11 ms·

181.
by luke5441 1y ago
Obviously you can add modules calling to C/C++ functionality to a scripting language runtime easily (and the interface to do that is already available for the browser implementation). In the above link Node could be described as a Chro
182.
by luke5441 1y ago
If you use async I/O you can just use the Chrome JavaScript runtime as-is. I would claim it was the only low-effort model available to them and therefore not motivation. The motivation for node was that users wanted to use JavaScript o
183.
by luke5441 1y ago
With a shared interpreter/process state, like Python, Java, C, C++, ... Node is not a web page, so no reason to limit it to the same patterns. Then, the next issue would be thread safety. But that could be treated as a separate problem
184.
by luke5441 1y ago
They could have added threads to Node as well? Granted, it would have been a lot of difficult work.
185.
by luke5441 1y ago
Every time I used it for more than that I ran into performance and other concerns (like durability and consistency) pretty quickly. I cannot imagine how this is used seriously when there is something like Ceph available. Turns out most file
186.
by luke5441 1y ago
Sweden now famously has a very right-wing party in its ruling coalition.
187.
by luke5441 1y ago
Pursuing something like this would perhaps cost more than 200k in the US. And then the startup would likely just fold and you get nothing in return.
188.
by luke5441 1y ago
Having probably signed such a contract, how do I find out if it is enforcable? Probably talk to a lawyer, but how do you find one that gives you a straight, but correct, answer to such a complex topic. For me it is even more complex since