luke-stanley

7 ms·

61.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
When I read "from scratch", I assume they are doing pre-training, not just finetuning, do you have a different take? Do you mean it's normal Llama architecture they're using? I'm curious about the benchmarks!
62.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
I've clarified my comment you replied to BTW.
63.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
The behaviour is problematic, also Grok 4 might be relating "one word" answers to Elon's critique of ChatGPT, and might be seeking related context to that. Others demonstrated that slightly prompt wording changes can cause qu
64.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
The deferential searches ARE bad, but also, Grok 4 might be making a connection: In 2024 Elon Musk critiqued ChatGPT's GPT-4o model, which seemed to prefer nuclear apocalypse to misgendering when forced to give a one word answer, and G
65.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
You're right, and when the behaviour of large codebases violates expectations, the intertwined webs of code are problems. Alan Kay's Viewpoints Research studied this, and famously Kay proposed "t-shirt sized algorithms",
66.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
The title is wrong: the word "intel" should not start with a capital, the original site doesn't do this.
67.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
I think the API has some special IDs to check for reproducibility of the environment.
68.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
> Released today; probably the best reasoning model in 8B size. Actually DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B was uploaded Thursday (yesterday) at 11 AM UTC / 7 PM CST. I had to check if a new version came out since! I am waiting for the other
69.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
High value comments / posts are good to look for, though high value political discussion is almost an oxymoron. The post about it here was the first I heard of it, which is valuable to me. Zombot's comment (44133962) quotes TFA: &
70.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
The Guardian article is a new analysis about unchecked AI technology use by a government health official claiming to support science. Surely that’s HN-worthy, not off-topic? Is it fair to assume any element of politics involvement will be l
71.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
*It has NO grounding shown
72.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
Cool idea but for the actual results I have no confidence in it because it has grounding shown like pop sizes, locations / timezones etc, it's just vibe coded with stuff like this: "// Approx 7.68 hours - fundamenta
73.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
In my experience, on a public bus there is reasonable chance of getting a working USB A socket. But as a private business, it's not a complete replacement of the public bus system, however apps are used by people already to book on-the
74.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
I meant to say: Apparently this is called "embedding inversion", and that "Universal Zero-shot Embedding Inversion" is a related paper that covers a lot of the basics. Recently I learned that a ArXiv RAG agent by ArXiv L
75.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
"starting from an embedding and working backwards to generate a piece of text that is semantically close by?" Apparently this is called embedding inversion and Universal Zero-shot Embedding Inversion https://arxiv.org&#
76.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
Vibe coding is fine but right now it dominates the pitch, and it's a stark contrast to Vannevar Bush's grand vision of memory expansion. Even if you want it to be more, the pitch makes the name hard to justify and could harm trust
77.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
I think using the name Memex for "a tool for vibe coding" is a big mistake, especially if you have more general ambitions. Vannevar Bush says in As We May Think: “Consider a future device … in which an individual stores all his
78.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
When I Googled it, the apps listed include Firechat, Signal and Briar. Signal is centralised, Firechat is dead, and I don't think Briar are current either? I wish it was a simple web search. Even Deep Research needed the ML pot to be m
79.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
Seems like some people are not interested in honest and useful feedback because this got downvoted too! I thought it made clear points about an important topic. Well, whoever sees fit to do this, I hope you get whatever it is you want.
80.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
Whoever downvoted, a comment explaining why would be nice, when the cell tower generators are out, and there is only phone battery left, offline communication options could be useful, I'm glad I'm not in that position right now.
81.
by luke-stanley 1y ago
For offline messaging over Bluetooth/Wi-Fi without internet or central infrastructure, I saw these recommended by ChatGPT Deep research and they seem current: Bridgefy (Android & iOS) – direct Bluetooth mesh within ~100 m, instant
82.
by luke-stanley 2y ago
Why would tricks be needed? What about consumer rights, or such?
83.
by luke-stanley 2y ago
Transformer models like BERT have been lurking in Google search for a few years now (and non-transformer language models before that). The distinction between LLM and chatbot is pretty thin. Dismissing "chatbots with web access" w
84.
by luke-stanley 2y ago
They just released a SOTA model (Gemini 2.5 Pro) that beats all models on most benchmarks, it's a great comeback from the model side but IMO they are less strong on the product side, they pioneered the sticky ecosystem of web app produ
85.
by luke-stanley 2y ago
I use ZFS, but isn't the situation the sandbox is in totally different? Why would it be optimal?
86.
by luke-stanley 2y ago
Sorry, since the Platform UI featured it as an option, I figured OpenAI might enable o1-Pro via the chat completions endpoint, I just got around to testing it, and I also get the same 404 `invalid_request_error` error via the platform UI an
87.
by luke-stanley 2y ago
Simon, I see if via Chat Completions as well as Responses in their API platform playground.
88.
by luke-stanley 2y ago
Yes. Though it is split into a code section and an interactive section, like with Markdown previews. It really is driven by the code cells though.
89.
by luke-stanley 2y ago
Robert Horn's `Visual language: global communication for the 21st century` is another great one!
90.
by luke-stanley 2y ago
Famous last words!

More ›