lukan

8 ms·

121.
by lukan 1mo ago
Erm, I wrote "want" - you wrote "need" in the comment to reply. You seem to have it backwards. And thank's for the advice, but I know how to live with little to survive and I know what I need to thrive and that ain&
122.
by lukan 1mo ago
Been there. And I don't feel the need to be in that situation, but life is more about survival.
123.
by lukan 1mo ago
And who are you to tell, me what I need?
124.
by lukan 1mo ago
Why would I want 3 or more devices, when I want one device capable of it all and under my control?
125.
by lukan 1mo ago
"executive and legislative branches are one and the same" That was the claim. I know in theory it is different, but also in reality here in germany I remember a scandal, where a minister of transport stopped a rule breaking other
126.
by lukan 1mo ago
Can you name some examples?
127.
by lukan 1mo ago
"rather than push imperialism at them." Dude, all I am saying is that I have not read any claims by any researchers that there is absolute proof of any sort. You have such a claim, then just show it. And imperialism has nothing to
128.
by lukan 1mo ago
And for me they also save time in fixing bugs.
129.
by lukan 1mo ago
"If you weren’t so arrogant you could have gone on a journey of your own discovery." Thanks, but I did travel the world (and libaries) quite a bit and also was in the outback at places where few other souls go. Still, I do see a d
130.
by lukan 1mo ago
I did research and just gave you a quote that says maybe. I have zero reason to assume your position there is definitely proof for the claim 40000 years memory to be correct. "Do your own research for my claim" doesn't work a
131.
by lukan 1mo ago
Do you have the qualification to evaluate, whether some parts in the soil is a direct proof of some oral telling? Do you know their language? Can you rule out missunderstanding, misstranslation or plain fraud? I cannot, so I fail to underst
132.
by lukan 1mo ago
I was mainly mocking the absolutistic comment above, I find it very possible that the aborigines culture remembers very old events and that there can be proof in the conventional sense for it. But it would be indirect proof.
133.
by lukan 2mo ago
Because the basic assumption is always to stay within the bounds of the law.
134.
by lukan 2mo ago
And then you'd still have to ask yourself, whether anything is real or a simulation, or a dream of god, etc. Otherwise history is indeed much guesswork, as we don't have a timemachine and rely on lot's of indirect evidence fo
135.
by lukan 2mo ago
They'd also be very good at halluzinating the most fascinating stories together. Unlike a for a coding agent with reproducible tests, it is hard for a history bot to verify it's finding.
136.
by lukan 2mo ago
3.privacy Any organisation or individuals not wanting to have their sensitive data flowing away (either because of trade secret or data protection laws)
137.
by lukan 2mo ago
Ah yes, nowdays it is even easier, but "Javascript, the good parts" came out 18 years ago already. https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/javascript-the-good/978... Helped me get a more pragmatic appr
138.
by lukan 2mo ago
Fixed it seems.
139.
by lukan 2mo ago
Isn't that how average journalism works? Anyway, the important part about the tech in its current state: "However, at present, the prototype battery can only hold a very small amount of energy – a few billion electron volts – for
140.
by lukan 2mo ago
Not all people are doomed from the start to become asocial messed up beings. Probably no one is - but they all have a history and their reasons. And even messed up beings who don't mind shitting anywhere - can suddenly get some conscie
141.
by lukan 2mo ago
As the result will be shit and piss elsewhere in the open, a compromise could be having shitty free public toilets and nice toilets where you pay (or maybe not nice, but bearable). The alternative would be social workers, more psychotherapi
142.
by lukan 2mo ago
Or maybe just a joke, that most of the world does not care so much about security, unlike security minded people would like to?
143.
by lukan 2mo ago
Sign of quality journalism? LLM's probably would not have made such a misstake ..
144.
by lukan 2mo ago
"But a dog? You'd be pissed off at it for a bit, and then forgive it because it's a dog." Some grumpy old school hunters (in less civilized areas) would literally shoot such a dog though for barking in the wrong moment.
145.
by lukan 2mo ago
When you let the the agent do a test, or tell it to read that doc first, you will ground it in reality. Doesn't mean they are 100% reliable. But without and on their own without access to grounding information, they halluzinate wildly.
146.
by lukan 2mo ago
More expensive.
147.
by lukan 2mo ago
Likely not, but would you want the extra risk and the stress involved, that maybe one day you will find a expensive letter in your box?
148.
by lukan 2mo ago
Not if you let your LLM grounds its truth in established facts. Otherwise they would be useless for programming for example.
149.
by lukan 2mo ago
That was not the question, but what actual christian person of influence today believe that to be taken literal? I am one of those apostates and there is some social shaming that I can mostly ignore, but so far no one called for my murder o
150.
by lukan 2mo ago
In theory yes, I know, but it somehow kept coming again (probably bugs, also I switch dev devices often). For now it seems off.

More ›