ludwik

6 ms·

31.
by ludwik 10mo ago
Okay? I specifically responded to your comment that the parent comment implied "if you make a mistake and say sorry you are also a psychopath", which clearly wasn’t the case. I don’t get what your response has to do with that.
32.
by ludwik 10mo ago
I think the point of comparison (whether I agree with it or not) is someone (or something) that is unable to feel remorse saying “I’m sorry” because they recognize that’s what you’re supposed to do in that situation, regardless of their int
33.
by ludwik 11mo ago
But this sounds like an ideal setup, doesn't it? Tim is fantastic at execution, but he does need a shot of big-picture vision every now and then. Tim as CEO with Steve as Chairman, steering the broader direction, feels like it could ha
34.
by ludwik 11mo ago
Good call. I would feel extremely weird seeing "[my full name] is still alive" as a title somewhere...
35.
by ludwik 11mo ago
I think you misunderstood what people are taking issue with. You explain that this matter is complicated and non-trivial - and yes, that’s exactly the point! People don’t have a problem with real-time communication via audio or video in gen
36.
by ludwik 1y ago
There is a big leap between them not being the sole person responsible for technical decisions and them not even necessarily having a seat at the table for technology direction. The former is understandable. Later - quite surprising.
37.
by ludwik 1y ago
That’s like saying Volodymyr Zelenskyy supports Trump. Foreign politicians operate outside of U.S. domestic politics - they don’t get to choose other countries’ leaders. Their job is to use diplomacy to navigate international politics in wh
38.
by ludwik 1y ago
20 million unique users is not that much. I don't understand the claim that this constitutes 9% of all IP addresses. It doesn't. There are about 4 billion public IPv4 address. 9% of that would be closer to 300 million.
39.
by ludwik 1y ago
I don’t see a claim that anyone with a negative attitude toward AI shouldn’t be listened to because it automatically means that they formed their opinion on older models. The claim was simply that there’s a large cohort of people who unde
40.
by ludwik 1y ago
Turns out what constitutes "claiming" an IP on the site is nothing like you’d expect. You don’t need to prove you control the IP. All it takes is embedding a transparent 1x1 tracking pixel on a website, and every IP that loads the
41.
by ludwik 1y ago
Why train the model to know how to use very specific tools which can change and are very specific only to ChatGPT (the website)? The model itself is used in many other, vastly different contexts.
42.
by ludwik 1y ago
It is used here as the default for cases when the user doesn't know or care about the technological details and is only interested in the end result. It is preferred because it integrates well with the built-in preview tool.
43.
by ludwik 1y ago
There is "performance" as in "speed and cost" and performance as in "the model returning quality responses, without getting lost in the weeds". Caching only helps with the former.
44.
by ludwik 1y ago
No, it's because that's what ChatGPT users internally to calculate things, manipulate data, display graphs etc. That's what its "python" tool is all about. The use cases usually have nothing to do with programming
45.
by ludwik 1y ago
No. It is for saving information in a bank of facts about the user - i.e., their biography. Things that are intended for "the human" directly are outputed directly, without any additional tools.
46.
by ludwik 1y ago
My guess: if given multiple examples of using ALl CAPS for emphasis, it would start doing it back to the user - and humans tend to not like that.
47.
by ludwik 1y ago
Why? The explanation given to the LLM seems truthful: this is a string that is directly displayed to the user (as we know it is), so including json in it will result in a broken visual experience for the user.
48.
by ludwik 1y ago
> Worse, after attempting to delete all chats and disable memory, I noticed that some information still seemed to persist. I'm fairly sure "seemed" is the key word here. LLMs are excellent at making things up - they rarely
49.
by ludwik 1y ago
> there are far more ways for a system to be disordered than ordered I'm a complete layman when it comes to physics, so forgive me if this is naive — but aren't "ordered" and "disordered" concepts tied to hu
50.
by ludwik 1y ago
Is "game-changing" supposed to imply changing the game to a completely different one? Like, is the metaphor that we were playing soccer, and then we switched to paintball or basketball or something? I always understood it to mean
51.
by ludwik 1y ago
Okay, but which one of the two is the elephant-destroying one?
52.
by ludwik 1y ago
We used to have this in the form of a pair of HTML tags: <frameset> and <frame> (not to be confused with the totally separate <iframe>!). <frameset> provided the scaffolding with slots for multiple frames, letting yo
53.
by ludwik 1y ago
Neither is impressive solely because we've gotten used to them. Both were mind-blowing back in the day. When it comes to AI - and LLMs in particular - there’s a large cohort of people who seem determined to jump straight from "imp
54.
by ludwik 1y ago
Correct. They've mentioned the name during the live announcement - https://www.youtube.com/live/kA-P9ood-cE?si=GYosi4FtX1YSAujE...
55.
by ludwik 2y ago
I don't think they mean "knowledge" when they talk about "intelligence." LLMs are definitely not knowledge bases. They can transform information given to them in impressive ways, but asking a raw (non-RAG-enabled) L
56.
by ludwik 2y ago
Can you elaborate?
57.
by ludwik 2y ago
> Russians would be on the border with Poland right now He doesn’t even realize that Poland already borders Russia in the northeast. The arrogance coupled with the incompetence is staggering.
58.
by ludwik 2y ago
What's "politics"? Any policy enacted by the US government? That's not how it used to work here.
59.
by ludwik 2y ago
Sure, but we have clear evidence that generating this pseudo-reasoning text helps the model to make better decisions afterwards. Which means that it not only looks like reasoning but also effectively serves the same purpose. Additionally, t
60.
by ludwik 2y ago
I have often heard it used to create a (false) impression that the choice of tools does not affect things that matter to customers - effectively silencing valid concerns about the consequences of a particular technical choice. It is often f

More ›