ludflu

27 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by ludflu 15y ago

   Its not the syntax, its the concept that's hard. I read about 10 different monad tutorials, and it only made things worse. The only thing that made it click was writing code that used them. (Some monadic parser code.) Seriously, reading mon
2. 32.▲
   by ludflu 15y ago

   Funny, I just started reading about adversarial stylometry the other day. https://www.cs.drexel.edu/~mb553/stuff/Indiana_20110407.pdf
3. 33.▲
   by ludflu 15y ago

   notable efforts to do so include Google Scholar and CiteSeer
4. 34.▲
   by ludflu 15y ago

   Right. Impact factors are a pretty objective metric. While the journals covered in a citation index are a matter of editorial discretion, that's not really where the problem is. For example, the Web of Science sold by ThomsonReuters indexes
5. 35.▲
   by ludflu 15y ago

   because to prosecute, you would need to prove a quid pro quo in a particular instance.
6. 36.▲
   by ludflu 15y ago

   as far as congress is concerned, that may well be accurate.
7. 37.▲
   by ludflu 15y ago

   "TDD is nearly useless when your code is the opposite of what I've described above: specific and mostly trivial, with complexity coming from the sheer amount of methods and their interactions. " In other words, badly factored code is hard t
8. 38.▲
   by ludflu 15y ago

   ...and then multiply that cost by the probability that this will happen to find the expected payoff. If the work costs substantially more than the payoff, don't bother. If substantially less, you're negligent if you don't do it. (The Learn