ludamad

30 ms·

331.
by ludamad 6y ago
I have to say, the more experienced I get the less I have such kind of excitements. It sounds like K is great in certain domains, but for example looking at the language it is missing big tools I deem important for software for example - ex
332.
by ludamad 6y ago
Isn't Minecraft an RPG game? I'd call it a Harry Potter adventure mod
333.
by ludamad 6y ago
Hard to look down upon spending 3 weeks learning elisp and latex during undergrad! Tell your employer you did this and they'll be less kind probably :D
334.
by ludamad 7y ago
One critical thing for TypeScript's success that I wish for the Lua community is that it paved a roadmap for typing a huge chunk of the JS ecosystem. Porting to TypeScript can be entirely incremental, and you usually have a wealth of t
335.
by ludamad 7y ago
The first arduous task of a ML solution is to get on parity with computing basic statistics on the data coming in, and there are many fail points before and after that point. Saying 'we need a ML solution' is a lot like saying &#x
336.
by ludamad 7y ago
Mainly that there are many ways to express things, and inertia means reasonably effective solutions within existing type systems limits the push for more expressivity. Programming languages are slowly converging on features (e.g. lambdas) b
337.
by ludamad 7y ago
Is there a need for a less boring word? :D
338.
by ludamad 7y ago
Such consensus seems to be motivated by necessity. A lot of partisanship under the guise of 'we have voting majority'
339.
by ludamad 7y ago
Is it possible they would be served by a different standard where C is a high-level assembly? Although admittedly, "&*p" to me reads as 'load p' and therefore undefined behaviour
340.
by ludamad 7y ago
I find gdscript almost excusable, as it has been similar enough to Python and had a fewer killer features (exported variables are available in editor, as are declared signals, etc). It's still not the ideal design decision and I often
341.
by ludamad 7y ago
I'm fine with XML complexity, some things pay off. It remains entrenched in networking world. Some things are awkward though, like needing to introduce named fields for everything - e.g. not being able to have an XML file that is purel
342.
by ludamad 7y ago
Maybe after trying it out for five minutes you make up your mind - but mine was decidedly for it
343.
by ludamad 7y ago
In some ways, there is 'good disconnect' if the disconnect is that the academia merely informs your thinking, not your immediate actions. It shows that you learned the fundamentals in an insular environment that doesn't muddl
344.
by ludamad 7y ago
Yes unfortunately. It is that time when everyone I know had free time and money. The lucky of us got good jobs, the others debt
345.
by ludamad 7y ago
This is the most heart wrenching thing - total local victory is only buying time
346.
by ludamad 7y ago
I just had a family friend die of a heart attack with no covid symptoms - definitely a scary time
347.
by ludamad 7y ago
That makes sense, thanks
348.
by ludamad 7y ago
This is true, it is classic data denormalization - in the latter example, if all we want to gloss is the results appending, we need to read less
349.
by ludamad 7y ago
I would want some defense if someone was using say a trademark I made for kid entertainment vulgarly. Unfortunately marketing does sometimes mean policing language, if you would end up in an unfortunate position due to association
350.
by ludamad 7y ago
I guess I'm morbidly curious how much better performance a doped horse has?
351.
by ludamad 7y ago
I don't think this site places that sort of value judgement. As for "comprehensive", it's a pet peeve of mine when people mean "aspires to be comprehensive"
352.
by ludamad 7y ago
People are more confused than ever, I think it is a good call
353.
by ludamad 7y ago
Any services to deal with my anxiety about randomly being kidnapped?
354.
by ludamad 7y ago
My family is unemployed right now, an opinion has to be formed, then we are all kept indoors. I foresee continued growing pains
355.
by ludamad 7y ago
Any layman's explanation of health implications?
356.
by ludamad 7y ago
Success breeds legality
357.
by ludamad 7y ago
Interestingly they don't mention anything past California as an ambition, was this the idea Trump was talking about?
358.
by ludamad 7y ago
I would be potentially naively curious as well
359.
by ludamad 7y ago
How did you get that conclusion? What he is saying if there were advantages over normal employment, it would be more palatable
360.
by ludamad 7y ago
What a tacky and misleading move

More ›