ludamad

25 ms·

271.
by ludamad 6y ago
While funny, the moral I perceived is "Apple whole-asses everything thanks to vast invested resources", which is unfortunately not as actionable as the Ron quote
272.
by ludamad 6y ago
I'm less dangerous if I know nothing, but duly noted about how unwelcome medical advice can be
273.
by ludamad 6y ago
I understood more rendering the point moot than considering its validity
274.
by ludamad 6y ago
It does have a good point about "think hard about how to catch negative value actions" but yeah beyond that it's as realistic as the tennis metaphor
275.
by ludamad 6y ago
Definitely, making a partner feel insecure is a cause for concern, but the amount it would be labelled a betrayal depends. Indeed, a friendly relationship with your romantic gender has a much higher chance of being seen the wrong way, and k
276.
by ludamad 6y ago
While I agree, it's effectively what I was asking for OPs opinion on
277.
by ludamad 6y ago
As a StarCraft fan Blizzard has kept me quite happy, and I believe commanders and war chests just felt like the cash grab part of support anyway
278.
by ludamad 6y ago
"months of texting, saying sweet things to each other, and establishing true emotional bonds without any physical element" I do this with my non-romantic gender, where do you draw the line for betrayal?
279.
by ludamad 6y ago
Is it that shameful? He chose his words as carefully as anyone should, he said in languages he used. And indeed, a "grouping of numbers" is pretty ambiguous even if you know this exists. It could just mean an array or something mo
280.
by ludamad 6y ago
Thanks for your input. I've never really thought programming was much of a rewarding career for those capable yet wholly nonplussed. I hope, predicated on the notion that this isn't for you, you don't give up on developing an
281.
by ludamad 6y ago
Somehow I don't think crafting a link with a password in it is the best example for arguing for its place in the future :) What sort of migration effort does this cause you?
282.
by ludamad 6y ago
I don't think so. I think eventually we would have an ensemble of restorations with different flairs, like how people see movies based on history almost
283.
by ludamad 6y ago
I don't get this sentiment personally - I found that I struggled less to imagine myself there with the "enhancements"
284.
by ludamad 6y ago
I don't think fresh launches, even with bold new parameters, are always considered 'huge changes' in that sense. The fact that it could break local environment's was probably not even documented in those specific environ
285.
by ludamad 6y ago
The thing is every group exclusive TLAs from their local group, from their greater group, their company, their industry, etc. These acronyms can easily conflict and live very different lifespans, making a wide dictionary hard (except for id
286.
by ludamad 6y ago
If we were at a board meeting deciding how to spend my time, no. If it is done? Why not
287.
by ludamad 6y ago
Probably writing their own /s
288.
by ludamad 6y ago
It's reasonable in a vacuum but "having an Amazon microphone in your home" is not the same as "having an echo device in your home." There is a clear intent
289.
by ludamad 6y ago
I'd love a privacy union. So much that I could see letting it make decisions for me until I naturally worried about the privacy implications
290.
by ludamad 6y ago
Beyond your fair points, my statement is unfair because it's trivially true. "Transparency into critical vetting" hides the complexity of individual comprehension, single points of failure, etc. I just know I have very little
291.
by ludamad 6y ago
To me it was implied someone hadn't written one yet, and hitting translate got me half the article. Admittedly, this leaves me half-informed
292.
by ludamad 6y ago
Auditing - be it corporate accounting or election results - breeds false security the moment it doesn't work. I think transparency into critical vetting will be a big societal improvement.
293.
by ludamad 6y ago
I have lamented that a model of censorship is equivalent to free information consistently cherry-picked. In terms of censoring misinformation, there is potential benefit. It needs a system of public trust, however
294.
by ludamad 6y ago
What other major JS-sphere TS is there? Not a defence for those unaware, but not ambiguous for those who are
295.
by ludamad 6y ago
There's no conspiracy here, just TypeScript is now strict enough to need annotation, and the authors deemed it better to work with a valid TS file and annotate from there than loosen that strictness.
296.
by ludamad 6y ago
I work from Canada for a US contracting firm with little issues. Through them I work for Cisco which does have a Canadian office, however
297.
by ludamad 6y ago
Worse yet, a failure where the wrong people accumulate wealth will just look like planned corruption to the masses. Sadly one reason why central planning often is accompanied by censorship
298.
by ludamad 6y ago
I'd say it was a data point. There is probably more concrete lessons to be learned before giving up on (admittedly complex and fraught) central planning
299.
by ludamad 6y ago
It's nice to see ES6 moving along smoothly, but that's about it
300.
by ludamad 6y ago
Few clicks of the pencil tool and yeah, not sure what's unbelievable here

More ›