lucideer

36 ms·

601.
by lucideer 3y ago
This is a really cool trick, but the nice thing about containers is that you can do this based on where the link is going rather than where the link is coming from.
602.
by lucideer 3y ago
This gives the site read access to your private (hidden) Github email address(es) - I think often developers implementing the Github API think this permission is needed to access your public email, & it gets requested unintentionally.
603.
by lucideer 3y ago
Looks like they're just leaning on Github as an auth provider without offering any alternatives. Most sites that do this offer a range of options, including normal email signup.
604.
by lucideer 3y ago
> what do they mean exactly? Firstly, this study explicitly prompted people first to visualise years as a circle, so there's no guarantee respondents do this every time - so to answer your MCQ, the answer here would most likely be
605.
by lucideer 3y ago
> visualizing concepts is just not the way my mind works > are these people actually saying they see these images when they think about and use the concept of a year I do (not a circle but definitely a visualisation I see in my he
606.
by lucideer 3y ago
This is a nice enough study but those commenting here surprised so many people see the year as a circle didn't read the article carefully enough: > I asked our readers: "If the year is a circle – where’s March and December in
607.
by lucideer 3y ago
It still just works. Every single thing you could do without a package manager in 2009 still works fine without composer in 2023. All composer adds is the ability to easily use other people's code in your app. And that's not a new
608.
by lucideer 3y ago
Are we really though...
609.
by lucideer 3y ago
> they're not really something that can be regulated. They can be and are regulated, often by controlled burn bans. Climate change isn't the sole human cause of uncontrolled wildfires, nor do they need to be intentional to be
610.
by lucideer 3y ago
> identified as non-human-caused pollution The issue highlighted in the article is that human-caused pollution is being misclassified as non-human-caused pollution. Nothing more to it.
611.
by lucideer 3y ago
> whether stricter pollution controls than already implemented are necessary in which case this seems to posit that measures to reduce human causes of wildfires are not valid pollution control measures?
612.
by lucideer 3y ago
> they are unrelated to the EPA's emissions standards This seems tautological? Surely the proposal here is a change to said standards to increase their utility?
613.
by lucideer 3y ago
That doesn't seem required nor proposed. The issue highlighted in the article seems to be with the broad classification of all wildfires by the EPA as “natural” or “uncontrollable” events - it's pretty clear that this isn't t
614.
by lucideer 3y ago
> EPA regulation is not going to reduce wildfires. Not in the US so I'm perhaps missing some context related to which bodies are responsible for which regulation but... why can't EPA regulation reduce wildfires?
615.
by lucideer 3y ago
> for events that would legitimately obfuscate the data You'll need to define "legitimately obfuscate" here - presumably you're proposing that a majority of data consumers would consider wildfires irrelevant in thei
616.
by lucideer 3y ago
> ~100% of developer effort in the Linux graphical stack is going towards Wayland. If this is true it's a testament to how poorly designed Wayland must be - for it to have such comprehensive support & still be as limited as it
617.
by lucideer 3y ago
> will just have to sit back and bide our time I doubt that day will ever come without a significant number of potential customers stubbornly opting to go it alone with DIY on-prem alternatives (or at least somewhat SaaS-less - e.g. tu
618.
by lucideer 3y ago
> web.telegram.com redirects to www.usatoday.com ... why? > The point on blocking still remains That would be a cool feature - they take feature requests at https://bugs.telegram.org/ - I'm not aware of any c
619.
by lucideer 3y ago
Another of those four examples is internationally designated as a violation of the 4th Geneva Convention under UNSC Resolution 2334. I don't think one can say that international condemnation is particularly unique to any of them.
620.
by lucideer 3y ago
> or you have k8s configmaps [...] those things are all broadly fine; they keep the configuration state separate from the app deploy state Why are they fine? This seems to be an argument grounded in "it's a newer norm therefo
621.
by lucideer 3y ago
I think the best way to judge this is to look at management. Are they remote or in office? I work for a large corp who's CTO is fully remote. As an engineer, that gives me confidence, & the fact a decent % of other CxOs, VPs, &
622.
by lucideer 3y ago
A third option is very simply about focus. Yahoo experienced this itself under Verizon, wasting years on useless 5G-oriented initiatives, a completely irrelevant focus for Yahoo itself. If the focus of a company's leadership isn't
623.
by lucideer 3y ago
Expensive watches are often considered "heirlooms": I'd say trans-generational longevity is a reasonably high expectation for most tech.
624.
by lucideer 3y ago
I mean, relatively speaking, that support lifetime is still better than most pieces of tech, so they're still getting a better "deal" in that sense.
625.
by lucideer 3y ago
> I must admit I'm having trouble relating to the strong desire to have a phone that's more repairable than an iPhone. I have a Fairphone for one reason & one reason only: it's not repairability, environmentally frie
626.
by lucideer 3y ago
> one Fairphone employee > Perhaps that was in his "off time" I was more talking about the company's primary focus - they may well have (limited) resources working to it (whether it's off time or dedicated), bu
627.
by lucideer 3y ago
The Fairphone company's primary focus is on fair hardware: supply-chain ethical materials sourcing & fair factory wages. Software "fairness" is very much a secondary focus, so while they're open to de-Googling it&#x2
628.
by lucideer 3y ago
> We been doing this for decades This is rarely a solid argument for doing anything in & of itself. Even less so when security is involved.
629.
by lucideer 3y ago
> Why do you need a SaaS to handle your auth, mailing, database, and logging? There's absolutely no reason to require SaaS to handle database & logging, but: 1. For mail, in 2023, it's a defacto requirement, for any app
630.
by lucideer 3y ago
That's a fair point - even in tiny tiny Ireland there's many regional dialects, with larger countries there'll typically be far more. I guess the simple answer to that is: how much interest is there in maintenance. I don&#x27

More ›