Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lucasyvas
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
lucasyvas
1y ago
Counter-argument to the author: If you publish a package you are a supplier full stop. If you don’t want to be considered a supplier, do not publish a built version of your software. Allow someone else to build and publish it on your behalf
32.
▲
by
lucasyvas
1y ago
This is the wrong product. The right product is an AI-powered operating system that presents webviews. Web browsers as applications are made completely useless by the AI wave and I fully expect only the webview portion to survive long run.
33.
▲
by
lucasyvas
1y ago
Leave
34.
▲
by
lucasyvas
1y ago
I’m AI neutral but the writing style here is pretty dismissive, and - to match the tone of the article - annoying as fuck. Most completely reasonable objections to LLMs were totally dismissed.
35.
▲
by
lucasyvas
1y ago
Does Fleet not use LSP?
36.
▲
by
lucasyvas
1y ago
The more this stuff gets introduced the more I’m convinced to use Rust everywhere. I’m not saying this is the Rust way - it’s actually reminiscent of Python/C#. But, Rust does it better. If we keep going down these roads, Rust actually
37.
▲
by
lucasyvas
1y ago
It’s completely overblown. Almost every language with async has the same “problem”. I’m not calling this the pinnacle of async design, but it’s extremely familiar and is pretty good now. I also prefer to write as much async as possible.
38.
▲
by
lucasyvas
1y ago
I agree with the article that it’s difficult. What if Google was still allowed to distribute their apps via embedded Chromium, but were not allowed to ship the Chrome derivative as a full-fledged browser? That may still leave them some ince
39.
▲
by
lucasyvas
1y ago
Price transparency != “hostile and political” Typical gaslighting behaviour. If you have as many customers as Amazon and the price increases that noticeably, that’s them being by forced to cover their own ass versus taking the heat when the
40.
▲
by
lucasyvas
1y ago
If anything your description could be justification for some people to pay for it.
41.
▲
by
lucasyvas
1y ago
There’s zero chance this would ever be a fair split. They know nothing about building technology so are never in the right. This happens often enough that most startup accelerators pre-flag it as criteria to not invest in founders (with an
42.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
I don’t think articles like this are useful. Buyers always compare prices to current competitive offerings. In that respect, it is that high and that’s all that matters to the would-be consumer. The history makes for a fun analysis but has
43.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
I may be targeted for calling this the “correct” way, but it is - it’s the only correct way. Otherwise you need complicated setups to test any of the stuff you put up there since none of it can be run locally / normally. GitHub Actions
44.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
> Of course I'm sure some people would claim this is 4D chess You mean idiots of course.
45.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
This is a piss take.
46.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
If you are referring the 30 seconds to kill time, that would be holding it wrong. As long as your process is PID 1, you can rig up your own process exit handlers, which completely resolves the problem. Many people don’t run the main process
47.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
Practically speaking I think it requires a lot of will, momentum, and process to change this. The decision even if made soon would probably take a few years to complete. Supplementing it may be faster (eg. adding Euro and/or Yuan) than
48.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
Specifically the F-35, as that phrasing is ambiguous within the context I wrote it.
49.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
It’s easy to prove that half is wrong as well because all the US’ (past) global friends are screaming at the US trying to save them from driving off the cliff. It’s one thing for the US to want to remake itself - gradual, cooperative plans
50.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
It has completely fallen apart to any outside observer. It will take decades, possibly a generational timescale to repair. The damage is already irreversible on any near to medium term timescale - how bad it gets on an absolute scale is the
51.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
This belief is flat out wrong and is completely oblivious to the current geopolitical landscape. US is likely to get sanctioned by its prior allies in the near future and you need to wake up.
52.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
I find some of the comments I’ve read today in this thread somewhat enlightening - there is intelligent conversation about the capabilities of the American hardware and its software. The sophistication of the F-35 cannot be debated. But the
53.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
Seems to be working well to me.
54.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
Sounds like a hotel loyalty/rewards card from the guy that runs hotels. Hotels generally don’t care who their guests are either so long as they pay, so it checks out.
55.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
It’s probably in the interest of NATO, G7, and Five Eyes to not publicly announce removal attempts for the US. That said, at this point they would be silly if they didn’t shadow ban the US and make alternate arrangements without it included
56.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
I am too young to have lived through it and understand my observation is likely not novel, but it is new to me. I am a millennial born in the 90s, which means I didn’t really practically absorb any dotcom fallout either. Even 2008 was an in
57.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
I’ve noticed that there are some interesting bubbles around this fact as well. Anyone that hasn’t been laid off yet is completely, blissfully ignorant to the forest burning down outside their walls. I have been fortunate enough to hold two
58.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
I had about 15 posts that I had apparently flagged for no deliberate reason. 0 were intentionally flagged - guess I also have mobile fat finger.
59.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
I think you’re right but I don’t think this is the case in the US? I’ve certainly read many stories over the years of the hammer coming down on downloading on its own.
60.
▲
by
lucasyvas
2y ago
You won’t convince me of this so we are at an impasse. Freedom of speech is not the freedom to force everyone to listen to it or hear it. Users should always have the ultimate control over what they are subjected to.
More ›