lst

21 ms·

151.
by lst 19y ago
eppi niu ia! (arc english)
152.
OO seen as 'higher level static typing'(groups.google.com)
1 points by lst 19y ago|0 comments
153.
by lst 19y ago
Maybe this should be teached in the very first lesson of any introduction to OOP? (Just to show the real motivation behind that concept...) In my opinion you can program 'object oriented' in a very implicit way, without ever using a gener
154.
by lst 19y ago
I'll reserve my surprise for the first time someone using this nice theory in some real, traceable experiment...
155.
by lst 19y ago
This kind of thing will never happen -- successfully(!) -- the general trust level in the web is declining continuously...
156.
by lst 19y ago
He was/is simply one who is convinced that it can be done simpler/better. We all need this attitude...
157.
by lst 19y ago
Faith can't be calculated, and it's the most unpredictable thing ever (even more unpredictable than women or children...). And, there's no chance ever that faith will become insignificant. Look at Russia, a real religious boom now, after co
158.
by lst 19y ago
> Evolution is an observed fact [...] Has it been 'observed' for a few years or for millions of years ;) Again, it can't be observed for a period that would be sufficiently long to really prove for evidence. Hence it's still a theory, s
159.
by lst 19y ago
I prefer Pythons: http://pythons.com/
160.
by lst 19y ago
What is 'Python'? Should I've heard about him/her/it?
161.
by lst 19y ago
Facebook is wrong by definition: virtual contacts are virtual, real contacts are real (no joke! Try the difference!)
162.
by lst 19y ago
NASA is highly overestimated. They still didn't figure out how to land on sun. /sarcasm
163.
by lst 19y ago
40 + autodidact
164.
by lst 19y ago
2 words: too late. To me it seems much more motivated by desperation than by conviction. In about 5 years we will see all of Windows(R) source code released, but again, it will be too late...
165.
by lst 19y ago
Yes, thoroughly planned by Kismet.
166.
by lst 19y ago
I'd be really interested in their exact definition of 'large'.
167.
by lst 19y ago
.tfel ot thgir si GP
168.
by lst 19y ago
tohu-wa-bohu
169.
by lst 19y ago
Paul_Graham(R), the well-known Registered Trademark, has finally found how not to die, and integrated and evaluater for this into his brain/organism. So there's really hope for Arc to be finished in his life time, now!
170.
by lst 19y ago
BTW, it's one of the most useful tricks in philosophy to always mime the ignorant (which is, absolutely speaking, always more true than the opposite...). It's the trick to grow in wisdom every time you discuss with any other person.
171.
by lst 19y ago
Inverting all colors. Very useful, sometimes.
172.
by lst 19y ago
(I just find it curious that any single user here has to guess how to do proper formatting.)
173.
by lst 19y ago
Is PG neglecting his users?! And how is this?! So he's a bad teacher, not following his own advices. That's sad.
174.
by lst 19y ago
Same for real artists. It's always the details which make the difference. And the reason is very clear: the details are the really delicate part (and the most difficult to grasp). For someone, all sunsets are equal, and for some other one,
175.
by lst 19y ago
> needs to be corrected It's only an opinion, and it's situated in a certain culture and situation. If you look closer, quite everything needs a 'correction'. If you want something perfect, humans are the wrong place to search for.
176.
by lst 19y ago
I don't have personally any problem with 'millions of years', and I don't say that the evolution theory is wrong, but for me it simply stays a nice theory, which can't be proven, and which isn't able to explain everything. I do believe that
177.
by lst 19y ago
Religion apart, only a fundamentalistic person would say that the earth is only 6,000 years old. The problem is not earth, but animals. The real problem is that 'millions of years' period. Anybody can make up a nice theory involving 'millio
178.
by lst 19y ago
I mean that there are two different things which can be confused easily: evolution and adaption/assimilation/conformation. Many things that seem to confirm evolution could in fact be of the second group cited above.
179.
by lst 19y ago
Do you know that Darwinism is becoming more and more obsolete? It's not me saying this, but many major scientiscts. The only reason for Darwinism still to exist is because of the atheists. But atheists are extreme - an intelligent human sho
180.
by lst 19y ago
...loving wisdom!

More ›