lovich

11 ms·

211.
by lovich 3mo ago
Do the Chinese models have anything to say about Tiananmen Square? Or if they can act as a surrogate girlfriend/boyfriend? Both countries are engaging in different flavors of censoring.
212.
by lovich 3mo ago
When AI doesn’t hallucinate as a fundamental aspect of the technology, that might be a viable option. As it is, throwing a statistical word guessing machine at legal issues is a nightmare. Look at the lawyers already sanctioned for using AI
213.
by lovich 3mo ago
> When I say that most of our state LEO's have strict adherence to the code of ethics, I mean that. When I say those in the grey area still consider themselves to have strict adherence, I also mean that. When Terrance Howard says 1x
214.
by lovich 3mo ago
PBA = Police Benevolent Association > How can you assume the LEOs with variable ethics are in the 80% and not the 20%? Is that a real question? Having strict ethics is a higher bar than variable ethics. How can you assume that more LEO’s
215.
by lovich 3mo ago
Is that locale in the United States as I assumed based on the conversation being around flock cameras? If it is, and you are assuming 80% strict ethics then I have a PBA card from my grandfather to pull out to show you how incorrect that is
216.
by lovich 3mo ago
> i always hoped the "buddy" would be the lever that goes "no, that's crossing the line between friendship and ethics, please rethink your request" What percent of law enforcement agents do you think would meet t
217.
by lovich 3mo ago
> I get the skepticism, I really do, but my hope is that your own AI(s) confirm exactly what I'm claiming within these comments Given that you stated your readme is for bots, given that you expect our own AI to interpret it based on
218.
by lovich 3mo ago
If the only user is the author, then I don’t see a meaningful distinction between shipped and not shipped. It’s like a blacksmith who said they invented a new tool with great value but they built it themselves and no one else is willing to
219.
by lovich 3mo ago
> If you don’t have public transportation that I feel safe having a 10-year-old ride on unaccompanied by an adult then you do not have public transportation. You have a very expensive drug addict shelter on wheels/rails. What an esc
220.
by lovich 3mo ago
I don’t know if you intended it, but that was a good pun
221.
by lovich 3mo ago
I really enjoyed asking questions where I linked a similar answered question, went through the details that caused my problem to be mechanically different or rendered the other answer as not possible, and then having a moderator close it as
222.
by lovich 3mo ago
So your only problem is that the laws are new and regulating American corporate actions, not the laws itself? What is your cutoff timeline for where it’s an established law vs a new regulation?
223.
by lovich 3mo ago
> I think it's fine that I used the terms interchangeably but you can disagree if you want. Pick the term you prefer instead. This is what you said most recently > If tech companies blatantly break established law then of course
224.
by lovich 3mo ago
> The EU creates new laws… > If tech companies blatantly break established law then of course they should be punished. However that's not what is happening most of the time, it's new regulations to constrain US tech. Can you
225.
by lovich 3mo ago
The EU is the government literally making the laws. It’s as arbitrary as any government making laws. US law does not apply outside of US jurisdictions unless we are willing to use our military power to take over their sovereignty. Do you th
226.
by lovich 3mo ago
They used the word “entitled” if the article is to be believed. How is this sensational? This is on par with the current admin taking 10% of Intel in exchange for giving them funds that were already awarded to Intel and were required to be
227.
by lovich 3mo ago
No, it’s because they keep breaking the law in the jurisdiction they are operating in.
228.
by lovich 3mo ago
How does respect for a person make them untrickable. And don’t believe me then, read the twitter files yourself. It was the Biden admin going, “these guys are breaking your TOS, please do something about it” and then Twitter _sometimes_ rem
229.
by lovich 3mo ago
You really should get your spending under control. Unfortunately unless you become one of the real people class through a large lottery, it sounds like you owe the rest of your life to AWS until you can pay off your debts for being so carel
230.
by lovich 3mo ago
Is getting the prices to fall at all not a massive success when they are rising everywhere else? Wouldn’t even just arresting the price increases at 0 while other countries/regions deal with rapidly increasing prices be a win?
231.
by lovich 3mo ago
Do you think if you built a million houses for every person that the price would go down? I’m using hyperbole here specifically because I’ve met nimbys who confidently state that the price would not go down in that situation. Assuming your
232.
by lovich 3mo ago
It was more publicly known because Musk made a big deal about the “Twitter files” which were a big nothing burger hyped up by musk and a bunch of journalists like Matt Taibi who were being led around by their nose by Musk. I remember watchi
233.
by lovich 3mo ago
No man, I’d you had just said > I was willing to give him a pass… That could be logically consistent given how he is more censorious than the previous management, but you said > I was willing to give him a pass (still am)… That means
234.
by lovich 3mo ago
> I was willing to give him a pass (still am) in a vacuum regarding the Twitter thing given the mass censorship of the old regime (sorry - no, it wasn't acceptable, in any way shape or form)… Why give him the benefit of the doubt wh
235.
by lovich 3mo ago
Can a business not just reach a steady state after maximizing its market?
236.
by lovich 3mo ago
It’s a close relative of the “I haven’t heard of that defense” by politicians who have definitely heard about said event in question.
237.
by lovich 4mo ago
If you can be compelled to produce your papers or get arrested by ICE then everyone will have to have their papers on them. ICE and leaders in this admin are also stating that they are aiming for millions of deportations.
238.
by lovich 4mo ago
Eh, we kinda can’t crow about that with ICE now, especially since it’s not just at known checkpoints where they are demanding papers. Free speech is also on the outs since we’re having people getting jailed for not carrying the flame approp
239.
by lovich 4mo ago
Some of every industrial resource, seemingly for every new technology to need one. As a country it’s been like playing civ and every tech upgrade you lucked out in a resource node popping up on your territory.
240.
by lovich 4mo ago
I don’t know any millennials who are inheriting anything. Everyone’s boomer parents who inherited family wealth are either losing it to healthcare costs extracting everything at their end of life or (literally in at least one friends case)

More ›