lovich

28 ms·

781.
by lovich 10mo ago
>I don't think it's wrong to go back that far. I think in a discussion about the effect of immigration on the current state of an area, in this case Silicon Valley, you can totally reference its history if you are making a clai
782.
by lovich 10mo ago
>Please continue doing whatever you're doing now that is working for you Lol. It doesn't work out because I don't have leverage, and tried to stand up for what I believe in. I also don't believe it would work for you
783.
by lovich 10mo ago
For more useful feedback, this is the sort of commentary that means I’m disregarding the posters views going forward. > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46642131 > But the whole argument is disingenuous. The artic
784.
by lovich 10mo ago
> Many leading Silicon Valley companies that are still around today were founding back then. Define “leading”, then tell me what companies are still around. I can think of two off the top of my head and one of them has an immigrant CEO.
785.
by lovich 10mo ago
> I spent most of my career working in companies with <50 employees I’ve worked for 3 companies like that. It was really great if your views aligned with the founder. If they didn’t, you got fucked. I really enjoyed when a bunch of ju
786.
by lovich 10mo ago
Yea, it’s anecdata, but I only replaced my 1080 ti about 1.5 years ago. Graphical fidelity is at the point that unless some new technology comes out to take advantage of GPUs, I don’t see myself ever upgrading the part. Only replacing it wh
787.
by lovich 10mo ago
Bruh, with some very rare exceptions like valve, every company is run as a dictatorship or oligarchy. That goes beyond tech, hell big tech at least gives some agency to their engineers. The only way you don’t need to be versed in compliance
788.
by lovich 10mo ago
For me it’s because he’s having to go back to the fucking 1970s in reference to Silicon Valley companies instead of what any modern day person thinks of, to refute their point. As a piece of historical information, or if we were discussing
789.
by lovich 10mo ago
Thank you for pointing that out. I was unaware. I like how these hacks like to pretend that we need to treat every engagement with them in a vacuum with their reputation intact and being given the opportunity of good faith after lying repea
790.
by lovich 10mo ago
Well I take that back then, my basic grep missed that because it was flagged and collapsed. You typed a lot and I’m not responding to all of it, but for this specific point > And secondly how do I EVEN PROVE THAT I AM NOT AI. You cannot
791.
by lovich 10mo ago
Nah, I called him out for the dog whistles because that’s exactly what he’s doing. He’s being vague enough that he can trot out some defense of “I didn’t say the exact word ‘immigrant’” even though the context of the conversation is about i
792.
by lovich 10mo ago
Hey, I'm just joyless, not broken. Also that thread was full of people complimenting his political views, not just his work on Dilbert. Don't try to sneak in political commentary under the guise of "complimentary comments&quo
793.
by lovich 10mo ago
Well see, now based on my heuristics I don't think youre here in great faith/a real person either 1) your account was made post LLM access being widespread 2) you made this claim > I am extremely annoyed at hackernews right now
794.
by lovich 10mo ago
You're using words like "parasite" and "non productive class" to refer to immigrants. I do not believe you when you are blowing dog whistles in every comment. >If I was anti-immigrant I wouldn't even conside
795.
by lovich 10mo ago
Yea, I live in in immigrant nation called the United States of America. Go re-read The New Colossus if you need to understand my views on immigration, and why I find his views reprehensible. My demographic, American, is being replaced by pe
796.
by lovich 10mo ago
Well, when they claim that X million illegal immigrants entered the country despite them supposedly not being in the system and thus not countable, and the numbers line up with asylum seeker numbers, and they do things like cancel asylum se
797.
by lovich 10mo ago
Brah, you are just straight up reprehensible with your views
798.
by lovich 10mo ago
I agree with the bad faith downvoting existing, there’s always been a trend on here of certain people thinking it’s tech related and good when it makes them money and political and bad if it loses them money along with several other biases,
799.
by lovich 10mo ago
That was obvious ever since they claimed asylum seekers that had followed the legal asylum process were “illegal immigrants” and society and the media just went along with that phrasing despite it being factually incorrect.
800.
by lovich 10mo ago
Not gonna lie, you’re a new account and you ignored the majority of my comment, binning you in the “likely a bot” box as well
801.
by lovich 10mo ago
The site is getting inundated with bots. For the past few months everytime I realize some poster I’m replying to is looping in replies or having gaping holes in logic, I check their account and it’s been made in the past few months and the
802.
by lovich 10mo ago
It’s governments with similar cultures and practices, all tackling a relatively new phenomenon. Coming up with similar laws could just be convergent evolution rather than coordination. You also can’t discount that once one country has tried
803.
by lovich 10mo ago
> Treating people like adults is that One Neat Trick that influencer bloggers don't want you to know. In the companies below Big Tech in valuation at least, having been in the room with drunken executives speaking their real thought
804.
by lovich 10mo ago
I’m surprised they didn’t take the opportunity to lean into their existing properties which in universe treat AI as an abomination(the in universe phrase AI stands for “abominable intelligence”) Seems like a missed bit of PR for their commu
805.
by lovich 10mo ago
I am aware of the situation and context. I was being sarcastic because the context still doesn’t make the quote acceptable.
806.
by lovich 10mo ago
Can you cite a context that makes the quote acceptable?
807.
by lovich 10mo ago
I remember those halcyon days long in the past in the ancient days of 2024 when the idea that we might invade another country with this admin at the helm was poo pood as extremism. Luckily the Greenland situation is different and we definit
808.
by lovich 10mo ago
All I know is that firing half my employees and never hiring entry level people again nets me a bonus next quarter. Not really sure why this article is talking about what happens 2 years from now since that’s 8 times longer than anything an
809.
by lovich 10mo ago
You asked about which piece "of the dual mandate", but the OP said "operates as" which I am going to reply to. Does the Fed can any data from labor sources or unions? I am asking in honest because the few reports from th
810.
by lovich 10mo ago
Assuming this section is accurate > In 2022, Elon Musk denied a Ukrainian request to extend Starlink's coverage up to Russian-occupied Crimea during a counterattack on a Crimean port, from which Russia had been launching attacks aga

More ›