lovich

25 ms·

691.
by lovich 9mo ago
Do tariffs increase the price I pay for an imported item subject to tariffs? Yes or no? No quibbling about other shit. Does the price increase?
692.
by lovich 9mo ago
You’re arguing that tariffs aren’t inflationary by bringing up other events affecting the economy, which I agree with ‘hypeatei needs explaining, but even assuming those do offset the tariffs you’re still incorrect. Tariffs definitionally a
693.
by lovich 9mo ago
Oh, in that case no w-2 employee pays income taxes, their employer does. I guess we’re all just mooches on society and only the company owners do anything.
694.
by lovich 9mo ago
Patriots.win if you want to see what they really think
695.
by lovich 9mo ago
I can read C/C++ code about as well as I can read German. Bits and pieces make sense but I definitely don’t get the subtleties. What’s eye bleachy about this beyond regular C/C++? For context I’m fluent in C#/javascript/
696.
by lovich 9mo ago
The comment was trying to replicate the same feelings as “people of color” but in regards to a lifestyle choice instead of an immutable characteristic, hence my flabbergasted statement at the audacity
697.
by lovich 9mo ago
Hey for audience, your numbers include asylum seekers who came here legally right? Just want to point out that for conservatives the set “illegal immigrants” include, large numbers of legal ones because they generally thought the asylum pro
698.
by lovich 9mo ago
Oh, just spontaneously died then? You know if you play the video backwards it shows ICE applying lifesaving bullet removal techniques on Mr. Pretti and Mrs. Good
699.
by lovich 9mo ago
They’re ruling like they don’t think they’ll ever be out of power again, which is why people are scared about future elections being fair and free
700.
by lovich 9mo ago
“Citizens of law enforcement” What a phrase
701.
by lovich 9mo ago
I’ll just assume this is correct because I believe the Russian government has mastered the art of just lying when there are no consequences, but if I was being critical, this phrase is giving me pause for evaluating the conclusions. > Th
702.
by lovich 9mo ago
Ah, more laws and regulations that cannot be followed by most people. I couldn’t tell you every single “social media” account I’ve made over the years as various startups failed after I tried them. I definitely couldn’t get all my family’s
703.
by lovich 9mo ago
Not sure why IP law would be respected if the king actually pulls the trigger on taking Greenland. That’s not guaranteed at this point, but it’s also not off the table since all the old rules are being shredded as fast as possible.
704.
by lovich 9mo ago
If the sheriff who arrested this person has zero personal consequences that make him change his behavior, then it is de facto legal for them to arrest you for your speech. They can do what they like, and your compensation if the courts thin
705.
by lovich 9mo ago
Not anymore. Now in the US you can be arrested if cops think you disrespected a dead guy they liked[1] [1] https://apnews.com/article/charlie-kirk-meme-tennessee-arres...
706.
by lovich 9mo ago
He wasn’t impeding. He was filming which until recently was a 1A right in America. The officer walked up to him and the woman with the backpack and started an altercation. Using your right of way analogy the officer drove up on the sidewalk
707.
by lovich 9mo ago
But then _wrong_ people would get a benefit and they’d rather die than have that happen.
708.
by lovich 9mo ago
He didn’t get arrested, he got executed. JAQ off harder.
709.
by lovich 9mo ago
> So you made a bad assumption. Nope. You're asking about the immigration status of a guy we all watched get executed. JAQ off harder.
710.
by lovich 9mo ago
I read through the Bible and multiple Buddhist teachings. I didn’t find “hacker news” in any of it, least of all when it comes to turning the other cheek.
711.
by lovich 9mo ago
Based on the history of interactions I’ve had with you, you didn’t have your interest piqued, you were looking for a reason that it could be blamed on the victim for information that the shooter had no way of knowing prior to pulling the tr
712.
by lovich 9mo ago
What orders? What obstruction? They walked up to him. You are lying by implication that he was obstructing shit unless you mean in the 30 seconds from being dogpiled to shot.
713.
by lovich 9mo ago
Cool link, where is your evidence that the protestors are sponsored? Ah, you don’t have any. GTFO green account bot spreading discord.
714.
by lovich 9mo ago
Of course he did. Facts don’t care about _your_ feelings. That doesn’t mean facts don’t care about _their_ feelings.
715.
by lovich 9mo ago
How the fuck do you watch that video and think the guy who was shot is the one assaulting the woman with a red backpack? The ICE agent does an almost comical shove to that woman, then the shot guy and her are pepper sprayed, and he tries to
716.
by lovich 9mo ago
Why would the leaders care? It’s currently a buyers market for employees, they can flex as much as they want and desperate people will still flock to them. The RTO mandates were not done with productivity in mind.
717.
by lovich 9mo ago
ah, because the two choices the government agents have are "do nothing" and "mag dump a guy after you had 5-6 guys pepper spraying and beating him on the ground"
718.
by lovich 9mo ago
"sponsored"? Can you run through the rest of your script and get past the Soros bucks part, it's boring at this point.
719.
by lovich 9mo ago
The censorship is cranked up on every site now, presumably due to fear of retaliation from this admin. They are hyper online, and threaten any companies business deals if they feel slighted. Its why you can get banned on reddit now for quot
720.
by lovich 9mo ago
No, you just claimed that anyone saying he wasn't obstructing is engaging in a fallacious argument. He wasn't obstructing, he was filming them. That's a literal fact, not a fallacy.

More ›