Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
louissan
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
I remember being nearly murdered by my parents after they received the phone bill via the (physical, paper-based in those days :-) ) mail. The minitel promptly was locked out of reach of the family's children .... still, good days. The
62.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
question of taste...
63.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
The company has acquired (more?) depth .. :o)
64.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
James, is that you? https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2F...
65.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
I see, what a hoot! :-)
66.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
"sending UI code to the front end for every request" makes more sense to some than ending up with client-side generated bloat of severe cases of divitis and/or custom tags nested ad infinitum. :-) Again, question of taste :)
67.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
care to elaborate on that "multi-column PK support" please? :)
68.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
The ORM is great ... but is a question of taste/previous experiences. Once you start playing with annotations, DB-side functions and subqueries, it is very nice. Only frustration I have is the power/possibilities of mysql (which I
69.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
Gotta love the file extension when saving "tldr" xD
70.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
probably though not massively if it's the odd site; very likely if it'a all sites. Not massively if it's the odd element in a page, very likely if it's all elements in the page. But perhaps more importantly the smoot
71.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
GPU/CPU battery consumption says "hi" but yes it looks nice :-)
72.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
yep :)
73.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
well tbh they still do today. Every byte you can take off (very easily at that ...) makes websites: . faster to the user, which does contribute to a general reduced level of stress :-) . use less energy: less bandwidth/less CPU (cisco,
74.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
Don't forget dithering your spacer.gif files! very important!
75.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
They should add a "dislike" button for this, me thinks 8o)
76.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
Sorry about the bad language, but this article is f*ing beautiful. An incredible read.
77.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
I have RTFA'd. Yes they are not indeed, which is nice. but as I wrote a few minutes ago .. ./dislike > /dev/null
78.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
Oh I could not give a dead flying flamingo about likes and dislikes on YT. It's the intent behind all this that I find repulsive. As someone justly mentioned above, this all comes down to uninterrupted flow of content towards (less) ab
79.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
ha! dislike > /dev/null
80.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
I find this pathetic. As if the removal of the "dislike button" helps in any way, shape or form to create a more "inclusive" environment. This reeks of the silencing of what is perceived as dissident voices, is all. I&#x
81.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
Disney's been talking to them ....
82.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
Leto II approves of this technology :-)
83.
▲
by
louissan
5y ago
it tickles