lotyrin

52 ms·

541.
by lotyrin 11y ago
What popular platforms don't deal with app URIs well?
542.
by lotyrin 11y ago
Any static generator (e.g. Jekyll) + any HTTP object store (e.g. Amazon S3) + any CDN (e.g. Cloudflare)
543.
by lotyrin 11y ago
Making OSX Linux is hard, but making Docker smarter about running on OSX is easy (have docker-machine provide a socket like this project does, have docker client detect the environment and connect to the correct virtual machine's docke
544.
by lotyrin 11y ago
I don't really like Apple's philosophy all the time, but they get this right at least, that both the hardware and software matter, and it's enough of a win that I basically use their devices+software in any category they are
545.
by lotyrin 11y ago
I wish more teams could get past the split between roles with QA and DEV, that the idea was as evangelized as DevOps is. IF your browser test isn't written in high-level concepts (page objects at the very least), and if your developer
546.
by lotyrin 11y ago
I'd think you'd get a better result from simulated annealing over GA here.
547.
by lotyrin 11y ago
No, he's right. He could be clearer though, Probably adding either "while" to the first or "however" to the second sentence.
548.
by lotyrin 11y ago
You could make this a frontend to an existing system like GPG
549.
by lotyrin 11y ago
Nicer framework generators will produce dependency configuration, have params for what database backend to produce configuration for, and produce applications prepared to be 12-factor (log to stdout, accept configuration via environment) ou
550.
by lotyrin 11y ago
The case I've always experienced, which is "<framework generator>; heroku create; git push heroku master" is a few seconds.
551.
by lotyrin 11y ago
The cross-service join problem is definitely a weak point of microservices. Generally you'd try to avoid designing service boundaries that you plan to do joins or transactions, etc. across. If you do need joins/transactions though
552.
by lotyrin 11y ago
Part of the potential gain with containers is that you don't have to treat them like full os environments, and don't have to worry about administering them as such. I'd rather have a few tens of simple, single-process contain
553.
by lotyrin 11y ago
It's Context menu -> Git -> Show history for function in Jetbrains products. Gives all the commits with changes inside the function, shows each one side-by-side.
554.
by lotyrin 11y ago
Does your IDE not?
555.
by lotyrin 11y ago
This isn't necessarily directed at you, but I frequently see products which have no disaster recovery because they can't get something that seems good enough, contrary to any economical reasoning about what "good enough"
556.
by lotyrin 11y ago
+1 for more distribution shapes, specifically power law, combinations of power and normal (Which you might want to consider for your soft-attack-long-tail variables over triangular, if the edge between triangles causes you artifacts), and d
557.
by lotyrin 11y ago
Syntax like python, sure. Execution like python, not as much.
558.
by lotyrin 11y ago
3.50? But then you'll get ancient cryptids asking you for rocket fare.
559.
by lotyrin 11y ago
Lots of off-the shelf "smart plugs" these days, with varying degrees of open-ness and convenience to their APIs. Or for DIY, a cheap micro plus a opto-isolated relay board.
560.
by lotyrin 11y ago
Give the bot runtime (not in the repository, environment variable or something) credentials for a secret storage tool of some kind, where it can then fetch credentials for whatever it's allowed to do.
561.
by lotyrin 11y ago
It still is excellent, because it reduces both the granularity and baseline cost of an autoscaling setup which is probably what you want for your use case.
562.
by lotyrin 11y ago
Drupal needs to decide what it is, do that well. It needs to decide what it wants to be, and optionally also work toward that. I hate to see its evolution as never-quite-there toward a never-quite-decided future. Whatever they do, the years
563.
by lotyrin 11y ago
Unfortunately it seems the current market for public opinion that is the modern media is too inefficient, we need a high frequency bid/ask system that can implant ideas directly.
564.
by lotyrin 11y ago
This is why specification should happen collaboratively with everyone with a stake (and that includes QA just as much as BA), you can fix them before they're developed against.
565.
by lotyrin 11y ago
That's the thing though, I can do 100k transactions per second with an RDBMS, it's not an achievement. Whether a DBMS allows relations or not or uses SQL or not is an independent property of whether it has built in dynamic schem
566.
by lotyrin 11y ago
This comparison is a dangerous one without some kind of qualification. This performance difference is not inherent to the design of these systems like you seem to imply. What use case and hardware are your hypothetical relational/non-r
567.
by lotyrin 11y ago
Quantile Digest (Q-digest) or something similar is what I believe is desired here. From what I understand it's a fixed size data structure, represents quantiles as a tree of histogram bands, pruning nodes with densities that vary the l
568.
by lotyrin 11y ago
Deletion. Modification of pastes and maintaining the same id (URL). Though, these can be solved with tokens per post, it's tough to remember/maintain multiple tokens, doesn't work out in practice.
569.
by lotyrin 11y ago
I don't advocate against formal languages, just against using tools that fail to truly comprehend them -- e.g. supporting high-level refactors. I guess I should have said "manipulate by hand" to be more clear.
570.
by lotyrin 11y ago
I don't think the hypothesis is that language designers have no experience programming, I think it's quite the opposite, that they have experience with poorly designed languages and tools, and perpetuate a sort of stockholm syndro

More ›