Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
losteric
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
78 ms
·
841.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
Guess I'm an idiot heh, totally missed that
842.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
404
843.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
what script?
844.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
That's not a stable situation. The EU forced Microsoft / IE to unbundle - Google's day of reckoning approaches.
845.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
In general, sure, but the context of this thread is drug cartels. Their unregulated businesses use capital to aggressively expand into other markets, destroy competition, and oppose democratic regulations - behaving similarly to legal capit
846.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
You answered a different question by cutting mine in half... my bitcoin holdings are stab-worthy, I understand why someone would hide their identity. My question reflects my suspicion of astroturfing. What would explain an anomalously high
847.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
That feels unlikely to me. Why would there be so many people who 1.) have enough crypto to be worried, and 2.) want to talk about crypto but didn't create a separate account prior to this negative article?
848.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
Aren't consumers technically voluntary, if we assume no one's getting addicted to heroin at gunpoint?
849.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
I'd like more regulations on securing / deleting consumer data, accountability for data leaks, public disclosure of political advertising, clear labeling of friend's content vs ads and organic trending content, and anti-monop
850.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
Traditional media only broadcasts content to millions, and they are regulated. Why isn't Facebook regulated?
851.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
According to the founder, they have been profitable since 2014. Anecdotally, I've been seeing more and more success getting friends to switch over to DDG. This feels like early mass-adoption. It's rather exciting.
852.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
Why not? They are a competitor in the search space... Public, private, doesn't matter.
853.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
My lawyer said that's not the case, at least in my state. LLCs protect against criminal and contractual liabilities, but not tort liabilities. I google'd it since I couldn't remember his exact legal reasoning, this blog post
854.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
> Mostly did it to ensure limited liability Did you consult with a lawyer? I've heard that "limited liability" doesn't really apply to one-person operations, it's intended to protect liability between multiple pa
855.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
I'm not really familiar with the policies enacted towards recovery... How "hands on" was the government in kicking the economy back into gear? Did we do much beyond lowering interest rates? Many smaller manufacturing business
856.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
Weed revenue is federally illegal. I think that's ridiculous, but buying crypto with that money in order to buy clean money is still considered money laundering under federal law.
857.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
lol, crypto isn't magic. Security through obscurity is not a solution. We're trying to move away from that tor blackmarket world. People need security through legality. This just needs to be... not illegal.
858.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
That depends on your target demographic. JS is more frequently disabled among tech-literate customers, so a cloud provider's home page would probably benefit from working without JS.
859.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
I think that analogy paints a pretty clear picture, this is a flaw because it's undesirable behavior in unexpected circumstances. A bug is unexpected behavior in expected use-cases.
860.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
Eventually those companies will have to start lobbying for those alternative public investments - the emotional argument is far more effective when <emotionally-charged need> is on the same ballot.
861.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
As long as acquiring an ID is equally painless for all demographics. Introduce a fee, limited licensing locations/appointment times, or complex applications, and the indirect result is often selective discrimination by race. That'
862.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
* NASA? * Repairing infrastructure? * Better public education (especially adult retraining)? * Expanding public transportation? * Medical R&D? * Other tech R&D - like batteries, fusion, quantum computing, superconductors, etc * Sing
863.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
That's true, a fair comparison would include metro and Caltrains, and NYC's equivalent long-distance commuter lines... what just makes NYC look even better.
864.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
Thanks, I didn't know about that tool. Better than the images I provided. Still, NYC subway is far denser both within Manhattan as well as the surrounding area.
865.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
I'm a fan of high-density work spaces, as long as they're built in tandem with high-density residential spaces and high-density transportation systems. San Francisco does the former without the latter. BART is an embarrassment
866.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
Kid or no kid, the Tenderloin is fine as long as you "fit in"... but if it looks like you can be scared out of some cash, you will get the predatory stare.
867.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
Yes, you're describing discretion and reiterating the author. They never suggested lying, merely being mindful of the circumstances when disclosing truth.
868.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
Are you asking for examples of failure resulting from one or more people overstating their confidence in achieving expectations?
869.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
What? You either selectively read my response, or you're being deliberately obtuse with your focus on office workers. Car taxes ensure the market accurately captures negative externalities. There is no discrimination - if a doctor, CEO
870.
▲
by
losteric
9y ago
> the smarter people I know earn good salaries and have nice lifestyles. Nicer than their parents, in most cases, mainly because consumer technology constantly gets better and cheaper. This is because today's booming companies rely
More ›