Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lossolo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
331.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
"EU companies have expressed interest in investing at least $600 billion (ca. €550 billion) in various sectors in the US by 2029"[1] 1. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qand
332.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
Housing costs mostly boil down to this stack: price of land + price of materials + cost of labor + margin + other (marketing, admin, fees, financing, etc.) When you try to boost the number of homes, you also boost demand for construction la
333.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
Yep, GDP ballooned from inflation, not because the debt actually fell.
334.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
He answered your question: > defaulting on its debt whether explicitly or implicitly (i.e., debt monetization producing significant inflation). The real constraint isn’t solvency, it’s inflation and currency value. If deficits are moneti
335.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
It’s a cycle that is always interrupted by war or revolution. The wealthy in the US do not understand what a revolution is, they believe that laws written on paper are as unbreakable as the laws of physics. Laws only function when the vast
336.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
"Excellent technical question!" "Perfect question! You've hit the exact technical detail..." "Excellent question! You've hit on the core technical challenge. You're absolutely right" "Great
337.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
> What is true is that the performance of LLMs at OOD tasks changes with scale. If scaling alone guaranteed strong OOD generalization, we’d expect the largest models to consistently top OOD benchmarks but this isn’t the case. In practice
338.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
Using (or controlling) machines, that it will design? Then humans only need to bootstrap the first factory of humanoid like robots, and after that, humans are no longer needed. Even with current technology, there are already almost fully au
339.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
> s people pre-flagging topics that are likely to result in a contentious flamewar in the comment section. I’ve never understood this argument: if you don’t want to participate in a discussion, then don’t, but why stop others from doing
340.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
We know humans have needs, and most jobs exist to meet them. The agricultural revolution mainly met one need — cheaper food with less labor. A superintelligent AI could meet all human needs. The only remaining jobs might be those where peop
341.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
> Even without a chance of UB. You're adding an implicit `Type | null` to every piece that uses nullable code without handling the null case. Each time you forget to do it, you cause either an UB or a null pointer error. And the pla
342.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
> Unusual maybe but the outcomes are the same. That’s an oversimplification. Dying of old age and being murdered both end in death, but we both know they’re not the same. > Why grasp so tightly to a genetic window a handful of centuri
343.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
"Always" is overstated. Populations have been reshaped before (e.g. farmers absorbing foragers in Europe, steppe migrations, Arabization of North Africa, the Americas after 1492 etc). So turnover isn’t new, but this mechanism is d
344.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
> Given enough effort, you can banish all UB and their related CVEs from a codebase. Sure. With infinite energy, anything’s possible - we can prevent all bugs. The problem is, we don’t have infinite energy. > So it becomes a contest o
345.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01191
346.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
Maybe because from a strictly evolutionary point of view, that’s a failure: they won’t pass on their genes (maybe also culture, values etc.), and other gene pools will take over the resources their lineage worked to secure.
347.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
> China (at least its current incarnation with Xi) doesn't care about soft power That’s just wrong. Xi has explicitly ordered cadres to "tell China’s story well"[1] and build "discourse power" that’s textbook sof
348.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
> Neither are memory safe, so if you're going by the "safe in practice" definition then it has to be verified experimentally. Hence - maybe. This is a ridiculous claim that it’s only "maybe". It’s so obvious, it’
349.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
You are mistaken. If the US decided to give up its role, there would be a void, a void that anyone who filled it would gain soft power from. China would be very interested in taking the place of the US in securing global trade routes, becau
350.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
> Is Go in mostly safer than C++? Maybe Maybe? You forgot /s there? Asking if Go is mostly safer than C++ is like asking if child proof caps are mostly safer than mason jars for medicine. > https://www.ralfj.de/bl
351.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
> You're asking for sea shipping to stop working because naval piracy is going to come back. That's a huge exaggeration. Who would commit naval piracy in the current age? Somalia, with their little boats and AK-47s? China alrea
352.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
Transformer does not need to emit a byte for byte clone of a training example to benefit from having seen it. It can store a distributed representation of many near duplicate implementations and then sample a novel linear combination. That
353.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
This seems to be the source https://www.ocregister.com/2025/07/16/where-in-california-do... "Most of California’s single-family house investors are “mom and pop” types, according to BatchData. Small-fry
354.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
12.8 GB is around 110 Gbits. Even at 4.25 bits/weight the network stores ~26 billion "micro weights". A 1,4k token space invaders snippet occupies ~1.1 kb compressed, the model could parametrize thousands of such snippets and
355.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
Implement or retrieve? That’s an important distinction. When evaluating models, you run a variety of tests, and the benchmarks that aren’t publicly disclosed are the most reliable. Your Space Invaders game isn’t really a benchmark of anythi
356.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
It's not really about nationalism. It's about other nations (especially those likely to face serious problems in the near future) having leverage over you, which they could use to serve their own interests at the expense of yours.
357.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
Hi there, thanks for the nudge. I agree those two sentences could be worded differently to convey the message.
358.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
[flagged]
359.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
It’s not just how much you spend on healthcare, but what that spending actually delivers. How much does an emergency room visit cost in the U.S. compared to the UK or France? How do prescription drug prices in the U.S. compare to those in t
360.
▲
by
lossolo
1y ago
> At some point it will be computationally cheaper to predict the next pixel than to classically render the scene, This is already happening to some extent, some games struggle to reach 60 FPS at 4K resolution with maximum graphics setti
More ›