Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lorenzhs
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
84 ms
·
841.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
Detector vans are mostly a hoax. It's thought that they worked by detecting electromagnetic radiation given off by CRTs, if they worked at all. Those are obsolete, so the point is moot anyway. But how should they be able to tell apart
842.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
Previous discussion of the paper: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13675891 (6 comments) ...and of this very blog post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13674181 (also 6 comments)
843.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
That's not the point. 80 dB isn't twice as loud as 40 dB, either, it's much more than that.
844.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
Your noise scale is off. 60dB is restaurant conversation level noise. For comparison, Notebookcheck's system noise scale is 30dB=silent, 40dB=audible, 50dB=loud.
845.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
Others have speculated that the tunnelling may be in preparation for a Mars colony, where underground living spaces have the advantage that they're protected from radiation.
846.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
Well I think it's a mixture of both, "disproportionate coverage" is a fair description, insofar as it misrepresents the activities and opinions of the research community (most of which appears to consider it hokum). I'll
847.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
They've been criticised for twisting physics to support the conclusions they want to draw from it, even if there is an alternative and much simpler interpretation of the results, see http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit&#
848.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
It is for compiler authors, or libc etc. There's very little most application authors would need to do.
849.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
Better archive link: http://archive.is/mt4mq (the site works fine for me, though)
850.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
Yes pi3g is terrible. Kiwi Electronics (Netherlands) seems very reasonable (€15.50 to Germany), along with The Pi Hut (UK, ca €16).
851.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
I found at least one UK seller that will ship to the EU for £4 (€4.70) and the US for £5 ($6.20), and they seem to have some in stock still. Just shop around a bit.
852.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
As I mentioned in another comment, you can get one for $18 shipped from a UK seller (The Pi Hut): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13753174 Max order quantity is 1, though.
853.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
Yes, it's £9.60 for the RPi Zero W and £2.50 for shipping. You can buy it for £12.10 ($15) total in the UK. Not too bad, eh? Shipping to Germany from the same UK seller would be £4, or £5 for the US. That's a total of £13.60 /
854.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
Note that NASA encourages its contractors to use their stuff for private missions as well—building more of the things reduces unit price (by amortising development cost) and thus costs for NASA, so it could be that this results in lower ove
855.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
I hate subtitles that aren't in the same language as the audio, that's just incredibly confusing. Having both in the foreign language requires a higher level of proficiency, sure, but I find it a lot more rewarding.
856.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
I'm well aware how to analyze a dynamically growing array (each insert "pays" for two moves in the future), but I'm not sure what you're getting at. The amortized complexity of appending an element to the end is θ
857.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
> why adding to the end of an array that doubles when it expands is O(n) amortized Not to be overly nit-picky here, and technically O(n) is correct as well (it's also the un-amortized worst case of insertion), but you probably mea
858.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
It helps a lot with understanding spoken language in a variety of settings, pronunciation, idioms, and all the other little things that make language appear natural. Watching movies and TV shows in a foreign language that you already know s
859.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
All of these problems are solvable, though: - Commonly addressed with logging bots and a link to the log in the topic - Some clients have this: when you drag an image into Glowing Bear (a web frontend for WeeChat that I'm working on),
860.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
I use WeeChat ( https://weechat.org/ , running on my server) and Glowing Bear ( https://github.com/glowing-bear/glowing-bear ) to connect to it from wherever I am (desktop or mobile), it works very nicely.
861.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
If you use this, you can also generate TOTP codes on your computer using the yubioath Desktop application. It's quite neat.
862.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
Apple has already done away with the headphone jack, and re-enabling use of the headphones would probably mean having to add a receiver to the tiny circuitry in the plug that houses the DAC. That sounds like a lot of work for a niche featur
863.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
See arjie's comment in another branch of the thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13666999 Quoting the linked paper: > Conclusion: The home environment appears to play an > important role in the spread of
864.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
There's only so much you can learn from books and TV shows. One might have Shakespeare's vocabulary and mastered the intricacies of grammar, but there's no substitute for prolonged interaction with native speakers in achievin
865.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
There should be a Safari action in the top right where usually you'd have the battery indicator
866.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
Yes, generics in Java or templates in C++ is how any algorithms library would handle this. Any type passed into such a function needs to possess the required operators and functions or it will fail to compile/run.
867.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
The two are not mutually exclusive, and the set of people who could work on either of these is probably mostly disjoint. "Don't fix problem X because problem Y is more important" isn't a helpful stance if we can work on
868.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
I guess it comes down to familiarity and experience with the language and tooling, as well as predictability of performance. Achieving C++-like performance in Haskell seems possible from all I've seen, but also requires a lot of experi
869.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
A good phish relies on triggering instinctive behaviour, e.g. scaring the crap out of you and not following best practices because you're having an adrenaline rush. That's how careful people get hit. SwiftOnSecurity sometimes post
870.
▲
by
lorenzhs
10y ago
There are U2F alternatives, several of which are mentioned in this thread. Also, U2F is immune to phishing while TOTP isn't. Your advice is actively harmful.
More ›