lone-commenter

7 ms·

31.
by lone-commenter 7y ago
They should not. Mine was a factual statement. I'm not saying they should be doing things differently; else they would become something else than a startup accelerator. What I'm saying is that their moral contribution to society,
32.
by lone-commenter 7y ago
I think replies to this comment miss the point. The author is stating that the "YC model" -- which falls under capitalism -- is generally incapable of fostering the development of society in any meaningful way.
33.
by lone-commenter 7y ago
> What's so special about somatic cells that makes them cancerous after so many divisions? Nothing, actually. I'd rephrase the parent comment. There is in fact a fixed (somewhat small) probability that replication ends up in a
34.
by lone-commenter 7y ago
Bad advice. Do not ever let CCleaner touch your system.
35.
by lone-commenter 7y ago
3) Actually it means "Romans' calfs are beautiful".
36.
by lone-commenter 7y ago
Sure they would: "Study Finds No Unique Genetic Cause of Same-Sex Sexual Behavior".
37.
by lone-commenter 7y ago
> But yes, that's not necessarily malice or incompetence on the part of the title's author. If it's not malice, then it's linguistic incompetence.
38.
by lone-commenter 7y ago
I think this paragraph is worth the article: We continue to feel incredibly uncomfortable about playing the role of content arbiter and do not plan to exercise it often. Some have wrongly speculated this is due to some conception of the Un
39.
by lone-commenter 7y ago
True. Users prefer "free" services. I can imagine that some do prefer paid services, but the majority expects things on the Internet to fall from the sky. That said, I think your point doesn't prove those businesses good to h
40.
by lone-commenter 7y ago
> another piece of user hostile code that doesn’t help their business. That's entirely their problem. Compliance with the law wouldn't require user-hostile "code" (I think you meant UI) if the business model wasn&#x27