lomegor

9 ms·

31.
by lomegor 14y ago
They could have done integration without changing or runining the maps. But that was not decision (either because Google cut them off or because Apple did not want to continue negotiating with Google). And you know why the integration makes
32.
by lomegor 14y ago
The article especially states that this was not the reason women were 'paid less'. "When scientists judged the female applicants more harshly, they did not use sexist reasoning to do so. Instead, they drew upon ostensibly sound reasons to j
33.
by lomegor 14y ago
"Galaxy S III can't do like Facebook and Twitter integration, AirPlay" What does this mean? That Android doesn't have Facebook and Twitter integration? Their apps are not baked in the OS, but Android intents take care of the rest, and you c
34.
by lomegor 14y ago
At least with Chrome on Linux is really sluggish when scrolling. It's like they have something on place to make the scrolling slower... or a lot of JavaScript code on each scroll event.
35.
by lomegor 14y ago
I think I've read somewhere that none of the jury's had a Samsung phone or an iPhone and that few of them had smartphones.
36.
by lomegor 14y ago
I find this strange as it has been explained a lot of times that the reason they will not question him on the UK is because he not only may be arrested after the questioning, but he may need to do more questioning after one round is done. B
37.
Google: Stop blocking the word "bisexual" from instant search results.(change.org)
1 points by lomegor 14y ago|0 comments
38.
by lomegor 14y ago
Well, not technically. He isn't being persecuted for being a whistle-blower and there isn't any hard evidence that he is. Of course, you can always assume that all the problems that exist with his extradition and all are caused by his whist
39.
by lomegor 14y ago
What I don't get about this change is why. I maybe OK if they did these change saying that users want to find content from webpages with mostly legal content, or that content from those website almost always have better quality. But this is
40.
by lomegor 14y ago
Unfortunately, I can't reproduce these results. I'm not saying they are false, but that maybe they have to do with personalized results for the author. Did you try logging out and doing the same searches? There was a maximum of results from
41.
by lomegor 14y ago
One thing I love about zsh that I think bash doesn't have is shared history between terminals. Nothing groundbreaking but it's great if you have multiple terminals enabled. Also, autocompletion in zsh is vastly superior, especially with opt
42.
by lomegor 14y ago
That title is really confusing. Samsung is not guaranteeing no one will update to Android 4.0?
43.
by lomegor 14y ago
There are two possible reasons for this. This most probably is a small patch. just disabling a feature and not removing it completely from the phone; as such, it would not affect drivers and such like other Android updates. The second reaso
44.
by lomegor 14y ago
This article only makes sense if you think that Google did violated Apple's and Oracle patents. Otherwise, it's just trying to shift the blame.
45.
by lomegor 14y ago
It's seems that what the author has against responding publicly is that he cannot control himself when someone posts a bad review. If you can't do that, then do not respond, it's as simply as that. The rest of us, who want to read discussio
46.
Google announces social sharing done right(computerworld.com)
3 points by lomegor 14y ago|0 comments
47.
by lomegor 14y ago
I'll tell you my experience with iOS. I bought an iPod Touch, and there was no way to put music on it. Because I run GNU/Linux the only way I could do that was with a Windows virtual machine. I click on a link on an e-mail an it opens Safar
48.
by lomegor 14y ago
Just because it's fun, this was posted a few weeks ago on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4099985
49.
by lomegor 14y ago
Opened the link to see what they thought was broken with some webapages and webdevelopers (i.e. NOT the Internet) and was pleasently surprised with a well thought discussion of the underlying technologies.
50.
by lomegor 14y ago
Yeah, I don't think it's a serious study (nor that it meant to be), but really fun nonetheless.
51.
by lomegor 14y ago
Nice project. Are you planning on open source it?
52.
by lomegor 14y ago
You do realize that by expressing your opinion you opened yourself to the discussion? And I do want to refute your point: some of us do not believe that these private businesses own the culture they or their artists create, and that society
53.
by lomegor 14y ago
I'm sorry if I missed the point of the article, or if it seems like it when I say this comment, but I hate it when people say that lacking a feature is a feature; it just seems like a lame excuse.
54.
by lomegor 14y ago
Probably inside intelligence. It would be really weird otherwise Google announcing their 3D map just before Apple announced theirs.
55.
by lomegor 14y ago
I meant that are hard to see implemented on websites, not hard to find. Sorry
56.
by lomegor 14y ago
I find it really incredible that this companies were so careless. Really. I know that security practices are rare to come by, but come on! LinkedIn, eHarmony and last.fm! These are some of the biggest websites.
57.
by lomegor 14y ago
Google's response: http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/setting-rec...
58.
by lomegor 14y ago
> But even if you wanted to include the "application layer". Who are the women that contributed to developing it? That's not my point in that part. I was questioning the invention of the Internet as an easy to identify fact, while tryin
59.
by lomegor 14y ago
You are right. I meant more of the kind "Hey, before your interview, do this". I misspoke when I said "interview problems".
60.
by lomegor 14y ago
You are right. I was just saying what I thought the article was saying not what I believe personally. Saying that the article's argument is saying the NYT is sexist and male-dominated is an over-simplification, and in it's essential part, n

More ›