Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lolinder
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
59 ms
·
871.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
The context that's missing for a lot of the left leaning people hearing this is that much of the population of the US still sees police officers as heroes worthy of emulation. The thin blue line between order and chaos is a powerful im
872.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
Recent and related: Give up 70% of the way through the hyperstitious slur cascade https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/give-up-seventy-percent-of-... I've yet to see anyone put this quote in context to show that the
873.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
This is great news, but the lack of a filter for DRM-free—coupled with the inability to send any other types of titles to an e-reader—makes this pretty useless for a lot of us. An e-ink display really does make all the difference for me to
874.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
Because the root comment is mostly but not quite right: there are indeed a large subset of developers that aren't interested in thinking about infrastructure, but there are many subcategories of those people, and many of them aren'
875.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
How in the world do you square this reply with your original comment? > Because it is really magical and unattainable If it's unattainable, how can you also embrace the idea that there's a path to attaining it (immerse children
876.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
There is no conversation here. There's one thread near the top that tries to talk about the actual vulnerability, the rest is knee-jerk snark. I totally understand why people are knee-jerking, but it's not a conversation and it do
877.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
Whether something belongs on Hacker News doesn't really depend on the news item so much as on what kind of discussion comes off of it. Some of the most insignificant stories are great Hacker News topics because they spawn amazing discu
878.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
They're the same phenomenon, just different amounts and precision of memory. Source: my wife and multiple of her siblings have absolute pitch and we've spent hours and hours talking about their experience with it.
879.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
Yep. There's so much ignorance around this topic it's kind of insane. I have no idea why so many people have such a vested interest in absolute pitch being something magical instead of a learned skill. I've spent a lot of tim
880.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
> and it's distinct from "absolute pitch" because people with "absolute pitch" don't try to remember a sound and match it up. They just know what a D sounds like abstractly and can identify any D based on th
881.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
I notice you pointedly neglect to even touch on my anecdotal experience that says that it's a trainable skill. And yes, he's 100% implying that this boy practiced to get there. He's not saying that he's going to be able
882.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
Right, but their point is that if what the article you link to is true—if 44% of people are right on key when singing a song—then it should also be just a matter of collecting 12 songs with different starting pitches and mapping songs to no
883.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
The first words of the video are "we're going to do the hardest ear training test of all time", and the description contains a link to "The Beato Ear Training Program". I'm really not sure what it is that you&#
884.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
They mean that TFA spends a while on this topic too.
885.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
I'm going to quote the paragraph you're responding to so that those just reading the comments can see what it actually says: > The marshmallow test also doesn’t account for cultural differences. In some cultures, waiting is bak
886.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
> I have a math brain. Where do you think that math brain came from? There are only three factors that could really influence it: 1. The way you were raised. 2. Your genes. 3. Some metaphysical explanation. I'm going to set #3 aside
887.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
Not increasing the unreliability—it's unreliable no matter what this early in the year—but it's possible that more old hardware made it in this past month than in previous early years which would explain why the number went down t
888.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
To anyone else who read the Spanish version first, note that the English version is longer and has the link to download the source code!
889.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
It's harder to find, so it's less likely to be noticed and exploited by a bad actor than a glaring issue. My experience has been that this is typical of these programs—you're trying to reward researchers for finding things th
890.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
Context that some may be missing is that this was inspired by discussion surrounding the Open Heart Protocol submission: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42791378 People immediately began discussing the applications f
891.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
http://web.archive.org/web/20240221001449/https://www.cpuben... They have more than twice as many samples on their Feb 10 update this year (47810) as they did last year on Feb 14 (22761). They have shown
892.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
Nah, I read that but I'm not convinced. The reply to them from palijer is correct: inaccurate does not mean lower, it just means inaccurate. Fewer samples means less data means more room for weird sampling errors skewing the data. Ther
893.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
Someone already gave the answer: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43030465 It's caused by people failing to read the fine print on the graph.
894.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
Who is saying this? Do you have specific comments in mind that you're referring to? I can't find anything anywhere near the top that says anything like this.
895.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
Bun does not handle TSX at the runtime level because Bun uses JavaScriptCore as its runtime and JavaScriptCore does not support TS(X). Bun transpiles all typescript code before executing it in the JavaScriptCore runtime. That's an impl
896.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
Right, I'm only responding to the last part where they imply to these researchers are not well paid. I'm saying that on an hourly basis or monthly basis $10k a vulnerability is actually quite a good payout when you have a surface
897.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
> then you should also pay well the people who help you catch and fix their gazillion mistakes before bad things happens. You missed their point about the business model of the security researchers here: their business model is finding a
898.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
> This exploit could have been used to create a massive near-complete database of every Google account has automatically had a Youtube account created. Massive email databases are extremely cheap, often free. For this vulnerability to be
899.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
> which by itself would motivate a few of them Motivation in the abstract is not enough to counter GP's point—they have to have enough motivation that it's worth more than $10,000 to them and also have more than $10,000 to sp
900.
▲
by
lolinder
2y ago
Not OP: I have a smartphone for my own personal use but don't use it for work at all. If my employer wants me to use specific phone apps they can provide one for me like they do a laptop.
More ›