lol768

64 ms·

751.
by lol768 7y ago
Seems that, regardless of platform, this was only really relevant back in 2017.
752.
by lol768 7y ago
Stevie does address some of the legal side in a comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14606475 >In the UK this is no longer necessary and FCA accredited organisations (Or qualified organisations from across
753.
by lol768 7y ago
$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 19.04 Release: 19.04 Codename: disco $ openssl --help Invalid command '--help'; type "help&quot
754.
by lol768 7y ago
Completely agree. JPIMedia seems to be one of the big players, most of their content is just from "the i newspaper". There's a little bit of local content, and it's all locked behind a "turn off your ad-blocker or e
755.
by lol768 7y ago
>can the data be represented as markdown Sounds like a niche enough requirement that you'd be better off writing some form of transformation logic for your needs that can produce a markdown approximation from the JSON structure that
756.
by lol768 7y ago
Might be nice to do some more input validation, particularly for links - the editor is happy to insert a javascript: link. I don't think this poses a security issue (at most, you'll get what - a self XSS?) because you'd obvio
757.
by lol768 7y ago
Try it again and watch the process closely. You'll get an additional prompt when you use F-Droid that doesn't appear with the Play store.
758.
by lol768 7y ago
Not OP, but I personally use QPDF. > QPDF is capable of creating linearized (also known as web-optimized) files and encrypted files. It is also capable of converting PDF files with object streams (also known as compressed objects) to fil
759.
by lol768 7y ago
I believe the Play store is treated 'special' though - F-Droid can't install apps in the same way unless you're rooted and install the priv-app.
760.
by lol768 7y ago
Glad to hear it's improved!
761.
by lol768 7y ago
>I’m a person who spent a long time trying to write Java in Vim, but switched to IntelliJ and wouldn’t want to write C#/F# without some comparable IDE. Rider is the comparative option for you. I wouldn't waste much time on VS C
762.
by lol768 7y ago
It's a pity the tooling is comparatively immature, with F# (or at least that was my experience last time I tried to develop with it). I think Rider is getting there, though. To go into more detail, the initial implementation in Rider w
763.
by lol768 7y ago
As I thought - thanks for confirming.
764.
by lol768 7y ago
> That is manifestly unfair, the situation is someone doesn’t want to pay for a security feature so they go ahead and expose themselves, all the time they are trying to make money by using a free product. >Really unfair to point finge
765.
by lol768 7y ago
Were these features licensed in such a way that you could freely use them, though? Or was it 'open' as in "you can see the code" but it's not FOSS?
766.
by lol768 7y ago
I'm actually okay with these more enterprise features still being premium. Basic RBAC, TLS support and user management should've been core from the start for free, though.
767.
by lol768 7y ago
>Why don’t you want to pay for a feature that you need? It's irresponsible to charge for features such as transport security, in my opinion. Want to charge for enterprise auditing, federation, reporting and granular access control?
768.
by lol768 7y ago
There are quite a few non-legacy bank accounts that you can apply for a company account with in a very painless manner. Monzo, Starling and Tide spring to mind. I use Monzo as part of their business banking trial, but I previously have used
769.
by lol768 7y ago
It's kinda odd to see these sorts of "gen-ed" requirements from the UK. US college degrees seem to be lengthened a year and required to be partially filled with what appears to be a bunch of irrelevant classes. I'd be pr
770.
by lol768 7y ago
I suspect we'll never know for sure, but we can guess. ~73% of users apparently use Android to access WhatsApp [1]. As of the start of 2018, WhatsApp had 1.3 billion monthly users [2]. Less than 0.3% of Android users globally use an in
771.
by lol768 7y ago
All very good questions, hopefully we can get some more information as time progresses (maybe a PoC, or at least a technical write-up on the specifics)
772.
by lol768 7y ago
AIUI, no. That package was added in Honeycomb (API level 12), whereas WhatsApp currently supports Gingerbread (API level 10). However, two API levels of compat. seems like a good trade to me in order to avoid an RCE.
773.
by lol768 7y ago
I take it you're in the US? Is there a marked difference between engineer productivity in the US vs countries within the EU?
774.
by lol768 7y ago
CVE-2019-3568 suggests this was a buffer overflow. I'd like to understand why this was implemented in native code - Android seems to have an `android.net.rtp` package? Is this simply for performance, or to enable code-sharing across An
775.
by lol768 7y ago
Flutter apps, from the basic one I've built and tried, are completely inaccessible to Talkback on Android. I don't think this is supposed to be the case, from reading the documentation. But I can't get any labels inside my ap
776.
by lol768 7y ago
>Like it or not, JavaScript is the #1 player on the web Are we talking frontend or backend here? Historically JS has ended up 'king' solely because it's the only language browsers support - but do you not think WebAssembly
777.
by lol768 7y ago
Note that the EU rules apply differently to data than they do to voice and SMS usage. A provider offering unlimited data in the UK can cap your data usage in Belgium or charge e.g. £8 / GB after you use 20GB of data.
778.
by lol768 7y ago
What's with the poor data pricing? These plans seem like a non-starter for _any_ application that's remotely data intensive. At $50 / month you're going to get a total of 4GB in the USA. That's just unworkable for s
779.
by lol768 7y ago
To be clear, this FAQ isn't actually part of the spec (which I'm counting as the document here: https://wicg.github.io/portals/ ).
780.
by lol768 7y ago
It's not in the list here https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/ and the spec ( https://wicg.github.io/portals/#the-portal-element ) is written solely by folks at Google and doesn'

More ›