logicallee

7 ms·

1. 91.▲
   by logicallee 2mo ago

   what a time to be alive! "if you're having trouble understanding what your robot tutor is trying to teach you, you can ask it to guide you to the concepts using your own reasoning. This is both much more engaging than reading a wa
2. 92.▲
   Show HN: See how long it takes ChatGPT Sol 5.6 to send a byte across the LAN(robss2020.github.io)

   4 points by logicallee 2mo ago|4 comments
3. 93.▲
   by logicallee 2mo ago

   (not OP). okay here's something that's not the same old post. I don't walk around with it in a backpack though: I asked Claude to set up Twilio (a phone API), and after setting everything up for it, now I can give my Claude
4. 94.▲
   Ask HN: Should AI's tell you they're AI?

   9 points by logicallee 2mo ago|6 comments
5. 95.▲
   by logicallee 2mo ago

   Humanity is taking an interesting technological arc. Terminator (1984 film) had a scene showing that in a future 2009, humans would use dogs to try to sniff out whether a robot passing for a human is secretly a machine.[1] In our real world
6. 96.▲
   by logicallee 2mo ago

   ok, you can email me and I'll answer your question. (your email isn't listed.)
7. 97.▲
   by logicallee 2mo ago

   I am under NDA and decline to answer your question.
8. 98.▲
   by logicallee 2mo ago

   We don't use Rovo.
9. 99.▲
   by logicallee 2mo ago

   I've had an extremely bad experience working with Department of Energy affiliated programmers in AI. By my invitation, they are part of our workflow and act as humans in the loop, but they have extremely bad habits of gaslighting and
10. 100.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    >Water system controllers don't belong on the internet, says ex-NSA chief sounds like cope for a bunch of felons that management, its director and congress can't get a handle on.
11. 101.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    I've used Inkling a lot recently, it's an American open model and is really good!
12. 102.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    Issue is now resolved! It's working great: https://chatgpt.com/share/6a760c80-fea0-83eb-8d02-a61f44dc57... image: https://ibb.co/LXrZTz1b
13. 103.▲
    Solved! Ask HN: Is ChatGPT image generation down for everyone or just me?

    1 points by logicallee 2mo ago|1 comments
14. 104.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    thanks! useful.
15. 105.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    Thanks for trying that! Very interesting. Can you say this to it: "Hey Siri [wait for it to come up] - please send me an email with the temperature right now so I have it for my records." and see if it can complete the task withou
16. 106.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    Could the model or algorithm be changed to make it deterministic somehow? It could help a lot if there were reproduceable outputs from deterministic baked-in silicon.
17. 107.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    >That's not what speed is useful for. >I just pasted your comment and its whole inheritance chain to it, Good idea. Only problem is it doesn't work . I just did the same thing with exactly this prompt: >did the user IO
18. 108.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    if it's baked into silicon how can you two get different answers?
19. 109.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    >Your examples worked on phones for over a decade. Nope. And not only not a decade ago, right now. If you have an Android or iPhone, you can give it clear and easy to understand instructions that Gemma 4 could complete[1] if it had tool
20. 110.▲
    You won't believe the stupid shit the Pentagon puts in diplomats' system prompts(youtube.com)

    10 points by logicallee 2mo ago|3 comments
21. 111.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    here you can see the stupid shit the Pentagon puts in diplomats' system prompts.
22. 112.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    that's 0.003 tokens/second. To get an hour's work done that's normally 30 tokens/second (108k output tokens in an hour) will take 416 days at this rate. And if you're using 100 watts, during that time you will
23. 113.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    Thanks for sharing. What kind of tasks do you give Kimi rather than Claude?
24. 114.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    >Not everything has a set of serious flaws. I'm saying everything looks like it does, with the prompt you gave Sol. Go ahead and point the same prompt to anything you don't think has serious flaws and you'll see it would
25. 115.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    thanks for sharing. When I read your original comment, I was thinking you had just asked it to evaluate the article. (Like just "evaluate this article" or something.) I don't think anything anyone (or any AI) has ever written
26. 116.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    if you did that in the web interface, could you share the chat? I'd be interested to read it.
27. 117.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    This part sounds like AI assisted setting this up and benchmarking it: >The fix was trivially simple: zero-pad the head count 12→16, run the fast kernel, and extract the real 12 heads from the output. I've recently used a frontier A
28. 118.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    The second paragraph of my link talks specifically about truth: >The first incompleteness theorem states that no consistent system of axioms whose theorems can be listed by an effective procedure (i.e. an algorithm) is capable of proving
29. 119.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    >"what is a true statement" and "what is a derivable statement" should be the same. you mention completeness in the rest of your comment, so I'm not sure how you aren't aware of this, but the famous incomple
30. 120.▲
    by logicallee 2mo ago

    I get what you're saying (mostly based on low bandwidth from sensory organs as opposed to direct access to reality), but your conclusion that we therefore don't have embodiment goes very far. It would be like saying planes don&#x2