loeg

5 ms·

61.
by loeg 29d ago
Do you think these people don't realize it's wrong, or that they do this kind of things during the 10 minute practical test?
62.
by loeg 1mo ago
As an engineer, I know what I'm getting paid to deliver is the work product. I don't have too much attachment to any particular set of tools to get there.
63.
by loeg 1mo ago
> Is it that we might think the 'Harvard study' in question is literally clairvoyant? Yes, that is a straightforward interpretation of the headline!
64.
by loeg 1mo ago
It's a pretty straightforward reading of the headline. Of course almost everyone understands it would be impossible. But like, you can also just write more clearly.
65.
by loeg 1mo ago
You're missing out, for better or worse.
66.
by loeg 1mo ago
What percent of ChatGPT users do you think know the company behind it is OpenAI? 10%?
67.
by loeg 1mo ago
Also, "most." Presumably most attempters were not participating in the study's surveys, so it would be impossible for the study to predict for them.
68.
by loeg 1mo ago
If you know absolutely nothing, though: expect usage of something used by humans to scale with the number of humans.
69.
by loeg 1mo ago
Only because you've redefined dislike to encompass portions of what most people would call like.
70.
by loeg 1mo ago
Global population is still rising. In general you should expect numbers to go up.
71.
by loeg 1mo ago
If you want a 16MB window, use `--long=24` (2^24 is 16M). (I believe this is larger than the default window for zstd level 3, but smaller than the default window at higher compression levels.)
72.
by loeg 1mo ago
(They do. The "matching" is just a fundraising gimmick; essentially a lie.)
73.
by loeg 1mo ago
The aside about C++ seems a little confused too? > C++ doesn’t have this problem at all, since virtual dispatch always goes through pointers and return types are always pointers too. Uh. C++ can return objects by value. Maybe it isn&#x
74.
by loeg 1mo ago
Europe isn't on or remotely near the equator, which is somewhat favorable for launches.
75.
by loeg 1mo ago
It's not obvious to me that the borrow checker actually knows, so much as it can prove there are no illegal conflicts between mut and non-mut references to the same object. If you somehow need this property in your programs, I think yo
76.
by loeg 1mo ago
Refresh rate does kind of matter. 1Hz imposes an average 0.5s latency on any update, which would be obnoxious in some situations.
77.
by loeg 1mo ago
Read to the end. It isn't really clear how much causality can be inferred from the hours after thing.
78.
by loeg 1mo ago
The idea that you'd get notified of infringing activity on corporate network and deliberately shift to residential without changing the activity is crazy. Like, it's hard to believe anyone is that dumb. > Meta also flags a con
79.
by loeg 1mo ago
Between that and the tenure, yeah.
80.
by loeg 1mo ago
Grandparent comment has zero to do with the article. It's just GP generically bitching about Meta. (Your "quote" of the comment does not appear anywhere in the actual comment.)
81.
by loeg 1mo ago
"Avoid generic tangents" / "Please don't complain about tangential annoyances."
82.
by loeg 1mo ago
Right. If we merely define "dying" to mean something other than dying, it's possible for a not-dying company to be "dying."
83.
by loeg 1mo ago
Are we getting a new Opus 5.1, then?
84.
by loeg 1mo ago
I totally believe that someone has gotten it this wrong, but personally I've never seen an SMS 2FA on a Passkey authentication. My most common Passkey complaint is that a service doesn't support them yet.
85.
by loeg 1mo ago
Everything's been discussed to death, including the topics OP chose to focus on. Whatever.
86.
by loeg 1mo ago
> Every default malloc implementation worked this way about 12 years ago. Perhaps "default" is doing the heavy lifting here. Glibc malloc was quite bad for a long time, true. But TCmalloc / jemalloc are 21-22 years old, r
87.
by loeg 1mo ago
"Using it with a third party high performance allocator allows you to benefit from static linking with very little performance loss" is disputed; 26% is not "very little," even if 144% is worse.
88.
by loeg 1mo ago
The problem is the "M." Anything beyond a single factor is unnecessarily painful. Make the single factor good (passkeys or FIDO2 or whatever) and the problem is solved without "M."
89.
by loeg 1mo ago
No mention of memory safe languages? Sure, it does not help existing projects, and sure, of course you can still have logic bugs (or memory bugs using escape hatches like unsafe). But they do help significantly in reducing the number of ex
90.
by loeg 1mo ago
> Most of musl's performance issues come from their allocator. Using it with a third party high performance allocator allows you to benefit from static linking with very little performance loss. This is addressed and disputed very e

More ›