loceng

32 ms·

331.
by loceng 3y ago
So I guess there's a lack of passion-sense of commitment and perhaps an incentives issue.
332.
by loceng 3y ago
Do you think there are many VCs who daily HN too, which is why that comes to mind, or just the association is useful for you to reinforce the values of feeling like you're being witnessed?
333.
by loceng 3y ago
Would that most likely be an artifact of not enough in-flow/supply of startups to choose from? If not, a mechanism to let the other participants anonymously vote and rate and comment such things, and then administrators can look at tha
334.
by loceng 3y ago
Required inclusion like this in publicly accessible Google Streetview interface would be ideal as well - otherwise there are some tricks that are used sometimes to make mammoth buildings look much smaller in perspective due to the angles (e
335.
by loceng 3y ago
I didn't try to argue that point but in reality the most likely culprits of interfering aiding in regulatory capture for bad policies to exist in the world's #1 global power will be those who want to knock them down, who would ben
336.
by loceng 3y ago
You open with what's called a straw man argument - and then you proceed to avoid my questions. What benefits or harms, if any, are there to China for their CO2/climate policy, and what benefits or harms, if any, are there to the W
337.
by loceng 3y ago
Where are you seeing the data showing that? E.g. what's your unbiased source?
338.
by loceng 3y ago
A bot with massive reach is worth paying for to the bad actor, but that is also due to the algorithms giving an outweighed reach due to their numbers. And your point is anecdotal and not from a scientifically derived process - intuitively,
339.
by loceng 3y ago
I don't know who's all directly or indirectly involved-responsible: it's a system of corruption where many different parties, bad actors, are aligning for a common goal - where there is a synergy with the line they are toeing
340.
by loceng 3y ago
Another way to counter bot accounts - arguably allowing inherently at least a slightly higher default trust possible - are paid subscription fees. Even at $1/month for an account, 5 bots would cost $60 per year, and for most that is ar
341.
by loceng 3y ago
We're in a global war and most don't even realize it because it's 5th generation psychological warfare; followed by a second incognito economic attack by purposefully weakening societies from within by purposeful mismanagemen
342.
by loceng 3y ago
There can be 1000s, if not 1,000,000s of paid shills by bad actors present online media - whether industrial complexes or domestic-foreign enemies being paid to cause problems, to be divisive - to divide and conquer; and what % will be AI b
343.
by loceng 3y ago
Indeed, they're letting all of these businesses and professionals subscribe to the gold mining equipment - but retaining ownership of it, and they'll be able to undercut those services and cut people off as they please.
344.
by loceng 3y ago
You don't think the extreme sophistication of technology and cheap-low cost of deploying said technology - e.g. the growing abilities of AI - to use to frame individuals, to manufacture "evidence" against someone, isn't
345.
by loceng 3y ago
Step 1) Have AI girlfriend direct you to show your naked body, what you're doing "to her" - capturing very high-resolution video and audio. Step 2) Generate blackmail materials of you involved in sexual acts in very high reso
346.
by loceng 3y ago
Naw, you're just dismissing my valid point because it has weight to it - you want it to be irrelevant, it's not.
347.
by loceng 3y ago
You're missing or avoiding my point? Comparing similar accidents regardless of FSD or not - a Tesla's occupants are arguably kept safer, would fair better than being in any other vehicle, right?
348.
by loceng 3y ago
Are these protein biomarkers also associated with inflammation in the body, perhaps diet-specific inflammation?
349.
by loceng 3y ago
Can you explain?
350.
by loceng 3y ago
How about alcohol odour detection required in all vehicles? How about attention-distraction monitoring, and perhaps first penalty or safeguard is forced reduced speed, where attention-distraction level determined determines the maximum spee
351.
by loceng 3y ago
Don't all Tesla vehicles have the highest safety ratings ever? I guess maybe though something being less dangerous isn't the same as something being relatively more safe?
352.
by loceng 3y ago
Fair point. So would you argue for attention-reaction time testing to make sure a person is fast enough? We'd certainly be able to gather data for the situations that end badly to very horrifically - with harm or injury - and determine
353.
by loceng 3y ago
So the solution is dumbing down the curriculum to appease to the dumbest - which has externalized costs, of course. But all this thread is great evidence towards requiring people of a certain ineptitude to be required to only use self-drivi
354.
by loceng 3y ago
Sorry but everything after "the driver who's responsible for their decisions was drunk" is moot. But otherwise, yes, your statement otherwise about giving "toys" to "dumb" people stands no matter the techn
355.
by loceng 3y ago
It depends on size and ambition, and if you're able to continue to improve or add new feature sets ahead of competition - and if you can maintain price points to serve/convince enough of the market to keep using you vs. competitio
356.
by loceng 3y ago
You're using an "alleges" as confirmation?
357.
by loceng 3y ago
How do you mean they're owned by the CCP?
358.
by loceng 3y ago
Fusion-Powered Cyber-Quantum Crypto AI
359.
Ask HN: What are the most popular or up-and-coming tech buzz words?
2 points by loceng 3y ago|4 comments
360.
by loceng 3y ago
Prosthetic fake finger covering so then you could just strip it off and apply another one and head to the next polling station?

More ›