lnxg33k1

74 ms·

661.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
What I said is that if we don't annihilate companies that are consistently doing unethical things (hiding studies about the effect of socials on teens, stealing data, selling data, etc. Can we agree these are unethical? Or we need a co
662.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
Yeah, I mean, it is part of EEA, pays for the access to common market, respects the EU directives, but has no saying, but that doesn't like make big difference
663.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
It's a matter of if they're the only ones capable of doing that, or if they're holding their spot and subtracting resources from fairer players.. Meta is the main instant messaging app, can offer it for free thanks to stealin
664.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
Of course it's not up to me, I am entitled to my opinion, it's implying that each phrase ends as IMHO (OR we need to make it explicit? Are we that bad? Can a single expose an idea that isn't his own?) But yeah it's not u
665.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
As European I've lived through the crisis of 2008, when people were killing themselves due to lack of money and the only concern of EU was pleasing markets, save banks without any repercussions to those who caused all that pain, etc. I
666.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
I am not sure we shouldn't try to annihilate companies, is a good strategy, or at least not for any company, Meta is useless for society and constantly lying, stealing, omitting, exploiting, endangering, we shouldn't be willing to
667.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
Because GDPR accounts for fines to be relative to global turnover https://gdpr-info.eu/issues/fines-penalties/
668.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
People have lost funds on blockchain technology due to scam / bugs / errors. With no one to complain too, regulations is always the way imho, more anarchy can’t be the answer to anarchy
669.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
It is sometimes not as straightforward, as I think we have that in order to prevent people from having enough funds to escape courts, as in, without money it's harder to flee law. Now some middle class criminals might be affected, some
670.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
That’s democracy you don’t get what you want because you are not the only citizen, you vote for your interests so that they are represented when discussing. Seems childish “I don’t get what I want so I don’t play at all” no? There are some
671.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
I understand this message is much more reasonable, thank you, I mean much less ordering, can I have my account and all my comments/contributions deleted please?
672.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
What a benevolent god, he won't take away the opportunity to comment on hacker news from people, how would they live otherwise I don't really like to be cheeky/sarcastic, but I don't really like people telling me how to
673.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
so he could just delete my account without pinching my balls? What are you trying to say? You can't change others to make what you want them to do, you can ignore it, or act in a way that it doesn't affect you, he decided to break
674.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
Nope I am not really here to satisfy randomers, but feel free to ignore me, or report me to moderators so that they can decide if they want to delete my account? Otherwise just stfu
675.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
Its all fake news/bait titles, good riddance anyway
676.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
And I won’t miss them, not sure the point you’re making, i am not able to know if a website has ads before visiting it, can only leave once. It has asked me to
677.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
Ok I’m in Europe, and haven’t met a Amp link for something like a year, maybe in other places it’s different
678.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
I visit a lot of websites that show blank pages upon seeing that I have an adblocker, so the technology to prevent serving those who have adblock is still there, I 100% of the time, saw the message to disable adblocker and just left the web
679.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
Are you sure about that? I am quite optimistic, it's not the first dominant-position abusing crap from Google, they also tried to impose AMP and to rank sites without it at lower positions, but AMP was ultimately fined out of existence
680.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
So He isn't back yet then? :'(
681.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
But if firefox is full of tech to prevent privacy leaks? They incorporated a vpn, strict mode, containers, third party cookie block, dnt, etc.. what the fucking hell are you talking about?
682.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
Are you sealioning me?
683.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
Is Firefox consistently trying to find ways to show you ads? Are they working on technology that helps profiling you? One thing is funding, keeeping independence, another is controlling
684.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
Because you break the interest of showing ads from google search/adwords, to the interest of surfinh web freely of those who would work on chrome Now google has both the need to show ads, and direct power on what people use to see thos
685.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
I don't have a Google account and don't use any Google service, still think that this libertarian message is bullshit, how do you do the free will if the web starts deciding which OS/Browser are authorised to do something? I
686.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
I considered myself normal functioning, but after reading the landing page I think a few braincells just hanged themselves
687.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
He isn't jesus
688.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
No qualitative difference but a huge substantial difference, you are born to believe in a religion, its 24/7 in television, in school, in politicians talk, its much harder to protect yourself from religions than it is to stay away from
689.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
Domain matches content I guess
690.
by lnxg33k1 3y ago
I feel that it could have been made clearer by writing "GNU/Linux has nearly half.. [etc..]", maybe?

More ›