Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lnenad
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
211.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
I mean this is the industry standard. For example every time Nvidia dumps a new GPU into the ether, they do the same thing. Apple with M series CPUs. They even go a step further and compare a few generations back.
212.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
I agree, and the fact that in their list of scenarios that cause these not actually mentioning some people actually are 10x definitely points to them not being self-aware.
213.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
And killing/hitting/maiming another human being is a healthy impression of the human experience compared to it?
214.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
Yr is generally very accurate. I am from Serbia and I use it as well.
215.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
This isn't some 30 people startup. Google's revenue from other sources will easily keep them running and building on top of these products with close to zero chance of failing no matter what happens with AI in the next decade.
216.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
> Doing something badly in 1/10 of the time isn't going to save you that much time, unless it's something you don't truly care about. You're adding "badly" like it's a fact when it is not. Again, i
217.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
> Sure, but why? They already paid the price in time/effort of becoming experienced, why throw it all away? You spend 1/10 amount of time doing something, you have 9/10 of that time to yourself. > A CRUD? Maybe. With bu
218.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
> The analogy with "monkeys with knives" is apt. A sharp knife is a useful tool, but you wouldn't hand it to an unexperienced person (a monkey) incapable of understanding the implications of how knives cut. Could an experi
219.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
Sure, you keep telling that to yourself.
220.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
Why do people keep thinking they're intellectually superior when negatively evaluating something that is OBVIOUSLY working for a very large percentage of people?
221.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
Yeah this surprised me as well lol
222.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
They've got users (which I don't doubt that OpenAI's fork of VSC would have as well but I assume that's their thought process)
223.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
I keep running into these sorts of messages in hn but my experience couldn't be more different. Even autocomplete does this automatically for me, let alone using chat/agent in cursor/augment code.
224.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
> Japan unveils world’s first solar super-panel: More powerful than 20 nuclear reactors > Under its revised energy plan, the Ministry of Industry now prioritizes PSCs on Section 0 of its plan wherein Japan aims to develop PSC sections
225.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
Yeah. I don't know why people project their taste as the penultimate version of x. The trend is there because the majority of humans obviously enjoys moving pixels. If you don't you just need to accept it.
226.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
> And these also why it requires no code changes to extract more metrics from wide event. I think the point of OP's comment is that while you're not paying code tax for to parse/aggro the data as it's all in one place
227.
▲
by
lnenad
1y ago
> Well you know, all those fun and creative parts in software engineering has been taken over by vibe coding What? In what way? Fun and creative parts are thinking about arch, approach, technologies. You shouldn't be letting AI do t
228.
▲
by
lnenad
2y ago
To be honest I was up and running in less than a minute so nothing stands out. I didn't dive deeper right now but if I could do this and export to Figma directly that would be 100% of my use cases right now.
229.
▲
by
lnenad
2y ago
Played around with it, really nice, will definitely use it in the future!
230.
▲
by
lnenad
2y ago
> It ends up only costing around $300 a month, however with the scale of events that it processes, the managed version would be in the 10's of thousands. I think this is a repeated question but... are you considering the cost of the
231.
▲
by
lnenad
2y ago
> It's not about having another tool in your arsenal. This thing is meant to replace you - the developer (role). You realize that it's what I am saying? Having the tool in our arsenal means being able to do another job (prompt
232.
▲
by
lnenad
2y ago
> Honestly, too many. Software engineers can be really, really dumb. I think it has something to do with assuming they're really smart. Maybe I am one of the stupid ones but I don't get you people. This is going to happen wheth
233.
▲
by
lnenad
2y ago
@stevekrouse FYI getGoogleCalendarEvents is not available.
234.
▲
by
lnenad
2y ago
> host with no cost associated to it Home server AI is orders of magnitude more costly than heavily subsidized cloud based ones for this use case unless you run toy models that might hallucinate meetings. edit: I now realize you're
235.
▲
by
lnenad
2y ago
I think since the complexity is high and you cannot run away from that other than making a very small box that not a lot of use cases fit into. The main use case of k8s is handling more complex use cases so you'd remove a large portion
236.
▲
by
lnenad
2y ago
I agree but in reality many will take the easier path of [`pip` `npm` `cargo` `yarn` `go`] [`install`, `add`] when seeing the functionality out there. I was also making a broader talking point.
237.
▲
by
lnenad
2y ago
Hey I'll have you know that memory is cheap nowadays and that I'd be happy to fill out my drives with node libraries for converting a's into A's.
238.
▲
by
lnenad
2y ago
Nah it's not you or your library, there is definitely a place for such utilities. The issue is broader, related to everyone installing libs for two liners and having bajillion dependencies.
239.
▲
by
lnenad
2y ago
I might be jaded, but I think having libraries for such simple use cases leads to the inevitable `left-pad` situation. When I say simple use cases I mean that since you probably don't need all of these functions at once that it would
240.
▲
by
lnenad
2y ago
Did you need an /s to understand sarcasm?
More ›