lnenad

12 ms·

271.
by lnenad 2y ago
Thanks for the suggestion :)
272.
by lnenad 2y ago
Good idea, thank you!
273.
by lnenad 2y ago
Thank you :)
274.
by lnenad 2y ago
Ah, that is why I have added the number of moves and the ideal number of moves :)
275.
by lnenad 2y ago
What browser, OS? On windows both Firefox and Chrome have no discernible latency for me at least.
276.
by lnenad 2y ago
Hmm, I don't know to be honest, usually difficulty translates to spending more time and the pieces being smaller does it make it visually harder to discern right?
277.
Show HN: A simple image puzzle generator(puzzlip.com)
56 points by lnenad 2y ago|30 comments
278.
by lnenad 2y ago
In an ideal scenario maybe, but we are social animals and we don't always conscientiously choose whose emotional feedback we value (in the case of managers/mentors/etc we cannot even choose)
279.
by lnenad 2y ago
You are basing the chance of intelligent life number on what? Reality is we have no clue what this number is.
280.
by lnenad 2y ago
I've gotten myself a Honor Magic V3 and I am blown away by how good this phone is. Screen quality, battery life, camera. For me this is the holy trinity. Unfortunately now I can never go back to normal phones. I am waiting for the Huaw
281.
by lnenad 2y ago
TCP is two way and in your example B has no idea that A can receive the messages it is sending. Example: What if B needs to ask A about the date in the same conversation, it doesn't know for sure it would get a reply (it can try but th
282.
by lnenad 2y ago
> but in production (with a single host) it allows for rolling releases I mean for me this is pretty much already enough of a reason to always put an rp ahead of my apps. It's requires minimal setup, most of the tools are fire and f
283.
by lnenad 2y ago
> Probably a lot more than at home. Statement based on pretty much nothing.
284.
by lnenad 2y ago
> If you don't have the discipline to work when you are supposed to, that's a you problem. Actually it's a company problem, that is precisely why this is one of the main reasons they are doing it and why it actually makes
285.
by lnenad 2y ago
> Desk, chair, lightning, monitors are easily googlable, too. All those things are part of the office and you don't have to pay for them. > Coming back to office creates more problems than it solves. Other than commute which coul
286.
by lnenad 2y ago
> All other issues are easily solvable too, either with the right tools, or the right processes. By coming back to the office?
287.
by lnenad 2y ago
Who will get the tax money?
288.
by lnenad 2y ago
As far as I understand there is no the why in the faq? > Radicle is an alternative for people and organizations who want full control of their data and user experience, without compromising on the social aspects of collaboration platfo
289.
by lnenad 2y ago
I am stupid, can someone explain the purpose of this as I am not getting it from their website?
290.
by lnenad 2y ago
It's only "right" because you echo his thoughts. If it were written properly with examples and proper reasoning it would entice those who don't share his opinion to consider their stance.
291.
by lnenad 2y ago
Let me rephrase, to a *much* higher percentage of real-world jobs that require solving harder than "high-school" problems. Right now the lack of real determinism and trust means that you can't really leave it unsupervised 100
292.
by lnenad 2y ago
What percentage of work being done daily requires solving harder than "high-school" problems? Single digits? Low double digits? If it actually becomes capable of doing this we might move on into it actually being deployable to rea
293.
by lnenad 2y ago
If you reach a level of complexity where it makes sense you should use it. If you reach a level of project maturity where you don't have (or want to have) the entire db model in your head you should use it. If you have multiple models
294.
by lnenad 2y ago
I think we can look at the issue from two sides. There is definite enshittification of software happening all around us with companies unable to understand that an end goal of product development could be achieved and focusing on feature bl
295.
by lnenad 2y ago
I agree with this, there is a reason Python is the king of data.
296.
by lnenad 2y ago
Only for situations where that knowledge is required.
297.
by lnenad 2y ago
I agree, as per example and point number one, if your goals was to increase conversions, you were successful. You can then go to the next step, slice the data up, and iterate on another change. If you fall into the box of over-analyzing you
298.
by lnenad 2y ago
100% agree, not everything you try should be a success, and most failures bring lessons with them.
299.
by lnenad 2y ago
Strong opinion that there is no wisdom in not using anything other than code to produce software for yourself. It's a personal choice. Selling it like it's an epiphany is definitely kind of a weird move. For your personal projects
300.
by lnenad 2y ago
> Not using source control and removing tests resulting in a better program is quite fascinating. Can you clarify what is exactly fascinating here? They seem to be writing simple programs, used only by themselves. In these scenarios of c

More ›