lm741

7 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by lm741 14y ago

   This is cute. It's like encrypting all of your files with the same one time pad so diff works. Also not secure at all.
2. 32.▲
   by lm741 14y ago

   You don't have to ask for a user's age if your site is intended for a "general audience". You'll still need to purge information from users who are discovered to be under 13. See questions 40/41 http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/coppafaqs.shtm#te
3. 33.▲
   by lm741 15y ago

   Speaking of DIY/open laser dacs, one of my friends built one called the ether-dream. ( http://ether-dream.com/ ) You can control it over ethernet and all of the firmware is on github. I put together a simple AVR based laser system once that
4. 34.▲
   by lm741 15y ago

   Correct. The richness of the Javascript environment for Googlebot is probably a more significant discovery than the POST requests. I previously pretty much assumed that bots didn't really run Javacript. (Or at least that they would kill net
5. 35.▲
   by lm741 15y ago

   I noticed this a few days ago. I'm actually considering POSTing the screen dimensions and a few other browser properties for Googlebot via js. https://twitter.com/#!/lm741/status/122378906669023232
6. 36.▲
   by lm741 15y ago

   For reference, here's a screenshot of the offending page: https://skitch.com/3141/r7xca/bin-laden-execution-video
7. 37.▲
   by lm741 16y ago

   I posted about this a while ago: http://lm741.posterous.com/16766453 Two easy ways to get around it: url shorteners and redirect services.