llm_trw

34 ms·

631.
by llm_trw 2y ago
>Reputation is the usual solution. Since it's no longer political to mention Iraq: every major news organization lied about the war, they knew they lied about it and millions died. The only person to be held accountable for this was
632.
by llm_trw 2y ago
The same people who wrote the original wikipedia articles before power mods locked them out.
633.
by llm_trw 2y ago
If news agencies still had reporters that would be a problem. They haven't since the 1980s. Everything that you say as some sort of doom and gloom prediction about the future _is the world we've lived in for the last 40 years_.
634.
by llm_trw 2y ago
If only he'd had art models to reduce the need for indulgences to fund art.
635.
by llm_trw 2y ago
>ai image generators have no legitimate applications They are amazing replacements for the clone tool from photo shop. >one technology could be used to do bad things, the other technology is guaranteed to only be used to do bad things
636.
by llm_trw 2y ago
The part of the internet that was not-garbage was always the part run by volunteers. Screening the number of people who visit those sites preserves them since the volunteers don't need to interact with the self entitled masses. That cl
637.
by llm_trw 2y ago
>I hate AI art because it's just bad. It's awful. AI produces images that don't make physical sense https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Persistence_of_Memory
638.
by llm_trw 2y ago
The first large scale use of the printing press outside books was to print indulgences: > In the teaching of the Catholic Church, an indulgence (Latin: indulgentia, from indulgeo, 'permit') is "a way to reduce the amount o
639.
by llm_trw 2y ago
The people who can are leaving the internet and moving to using AI models. The people left are the ones who don't know how, or have a bone to pick with them. As an example I've not had to use google for a knowledge search in month
640.
by llm_trw 2y ago
To quote an artist friend: exposure is good until you die from it. Being forced to do subjects that you hate is not exposure, it is being forced to do things which you are completely unsuited for. I would go so far as saying that being forc
641.
by llm_trw 2y ago
This is case showing us they are not.
642.
by llm_trw 2y ago
Having lived in 'one of those places' no salary does not.
643.
by llm_trw 2y ago
You can't eat respect.
644.
by llm_trw 2y ago
No I'm using noweb. There is an option in noweb to add comments in the tangled code with the line and file from which they originate. Then there's an Emacs mode that let's you jump to that code. I wrote a little function that
645.
by llm_trw 2y ago
You write it however you want. I don't know how you code, but the first draft of code is never what ends up in the code base. Neither is the first draft of the documentation. You can write both together, but until you have an idea of w
646.
by llm_trw 2y ago
Again, I'm having a hard time understanding what the issue is. It seems like you are deeply confused about what literate programming is and how it works. Have you read the original paper here in full: http://www.literateprog
647.
by llm_trw 2y ago
No, in noweb programs you insert chunks of code in multiple places and have conflicts when you try and automatically merge the code back too often. Org mode has a function which does this, but they didn't allow for arbitrary chunk nest
648.
by llm_trw 2y ago
I'm having a hard time even understanding what the question is here. You seem to be confusing the tools with the work being done. You can write a prototype of a C function in Python to see if you understand the requirements before you
649.
by llm_trw 2y ago
>The fact that your literate code didn’t get touched says a lot. The fact it's still used 5 years later without any of the code still being in production says more. >To me the name Literate Programming implies that you write the
650.
by llm_trw 2y ago
>who grew up on fast computers and IDEs. >>When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
651.
by llm_trw 2y ago
NoWeb can support multi-thousand page documents which can compile to tens of thousands of lines of code. I used it at a deep tech startup I worked a number of years ago to document the theory behind why the code was doing what it was. Doubl
652.
by llm_trw 2y ago
Here's another: literate programming. If it's good enough for Knuth it's good enough for me.
653.
by llm_trw 2y ago
The issue here is that government is using murder to solve housing. This was a conservative fever dream 10 years ago. We now have credible claims it's happening.
654.
by llm_trw 2y ago
>Meta, Google, and others crush OpenAI on a variety of other model types, but they also aren't hyping their products up to the same degree. They aren't letting anyone external have access to their top end products either. Googl
655.
by llm_trw 2y ago
As an AI model I can't comment on this claim.
656.
by llm_trw 2y ago
The only thing we needed was the compute. Everything else had been discovered by the 80s.
657.
by llm_trw 2y ago
> It's crazy, people used to be excited when a new version of Windows came out. I remember in 1995 a few of my fathers coworkers lining up for a midnight launch of Windows 95. By 2007 and Vista the same people were saying that you&#
658.
by llm_trw 2y ago
>You should ask if a laptop goes to sleep on linux, will it wake up ? Nobody knows. I've only been using Linux for 20 years so can you explain what you mean by this?
659.
by llm_trw 2y ago
Congratulations, you figured out how propaganda invented in the 1950s works. You're only 80 years behind.
660.
by llm_trw 2y ago
> It’s all downsides with entitled shutins getting their rare drama fix >> It's not clear their license was open source, actually. OSI Makes free distribution the first part of the definition of open source, as well the abilit

More ›